PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L C Hawes

Publications and source records attributed to L C Hawes.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Accuracy and precision of a robotic sample processor.

The accuracy and precision of the Packard Probe 1000, a computer-driven robotic sample processor, were determined using NCCLS Guideline 18-P, employing a rigorous gravimetric procedure. For volumes of 25, 100, and 200 muL, inaccuracy ranged from -0.5 to +0.6% (saline) and -0.8 to +0.7% (human serum), and imprecision from 0.1 to 0.6% (saline) and 0.02 to 0.8% (human serum), in the dip and sip mode of pipetting. For the same volumes of saline in the dispense-through pipetting mode, inaccuracy ranged from -0.1 to -0.9% and imprecision from 0.1 to 0.5%. To obtain this level of performance, the instrument's operating parameters were changed from the factory default settings. This automated liquid-handling system is capable of impressive accuracy and precision, but it must be calibrated in the same manner as any other volumetric device. Performance varies with the volume, type of liquid, and mode of pipetting. Inaccuracy of less than or equal to 1.0% and imprecision of less than =1.0% can be attained along with rapid, walkaway pipetting of calibrators, controls, and large numbers of patient samples.

Chemistry, Clinical↗

Assay of follitropin and lutropin by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay.

Recently developed fluorescent enzyme immunoassays (FEIs) for follitropin (FSH) and lutropin (LH) designed for the Stratus analyzer were compared with a typical dual FSH-LH radioimmunoassay (RIA) procedure. The FEIs use monoclonal antibodies in a sandwich reaction scheme similar to that of immunoradiometric procedures but with filter paper tabs rather than polystyrene beads and alkaline phosphatase as a tag instead of a radioisotope. Precision of the FEI was comparable with that of the RIA tests with CVs typically under 10%. The detection limit of the FSH test is 0.4 IU/L and that of the LH test is 0.6 IU/L. Measurable carryover exists but is clinically inconsequential. Neither assay exhibits total specificity, but the degree of cross-reactivity is unlikely to be problematic in most situations. Recovery with the FSH assay was 103%, with the LH assay, it averaged 108%. Moderate amounts of bilirubin and triglycerides and gross hemolysis caused no significant interferences. Method comparison studies yielded the following: FEI for FSH, 1.16 RIA + 3.1, r = 0.97, n = 114; FEI for LH, 0.77 RIA - 0.23, r = 0.96, n = 112. Difference analysis of the method comparison data revealed relatively poor agreement between the FEI tests and the dual RIA procedure. With the adoption of method-specific normal reference ranges, the FEI tests offer attractive alternatives to radioisotopic FSH and LH assays.

Cross Reactions↗