PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L C Howe

Publications and source records attributed to L C Howe.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

A prospective 3-year study of fixed bridges linking Astra Tech ST implants to natural teeth.

BACKGROUND: Connecting teeth and osseointegrated implants in fixed reconstructions is not generally recommended because of differences in their response to loading. AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical and radiographic performance of the teeth and implants used to support three unit fixed bridges subjected to normal functional loads. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nineteen subjects (10 males, nine females, age range 27-65 years) with an edentulous posterior free end saddle in either maxilla or mandible (Kennedy Class 2), and opposing natural teeth or a tooth-supported fixed bridge were treated and completed the 3-year trial. An Astra Tech ST implant (length: 9 mm (n=2), 11 mm (n=9) or 13 mm (n=8); diameter: 4.5 mm) was placed immediately distal to the last tooth or leaving a single premolar sized space. The distal tooth received a gold coping and the implant was restored with a customised Prepable abutment (Astra Tech Profile BiAbutment: diameter 5.5 or 7 mm). A fixed bridge was placed linking the gold coping and implant abutment either with the pontic as a distal cantilever (n=6, length 7-8 mm) or as a fixed-fixed design (n=13, length 6-12 mm). Standardised radiographs and clinical records were taken at delivery of the prosthesis (baseline BL) and annually. RESULTS: Plaque scores at implant sites increased between BL and subsequent years (P<0.02). Statistically significant increases in probing depth were observed at both abutment teeth and implants between baseline and subsequent years (P<0.001). Marginal bone levels (mm) at the implant and tooth were stable between BL, 1-, 2- and 3-year examinations (implant: BL 0.65+/-0.42, 1 year 0.63+/-0.47, 2 years 0.88+/-0.55, 3 years 0.78+/-0.64; tooth: BL 2.29+/-0.82, 1 year 2.41+/-0.8, 2 years 2.38+/-1.02, 3 years 2.68+/-0.86). No signs of the intrusion of the abutment teeth were detected. One case of abutment screw loosening occurred. Eight bridges required re-cementation with a permanent cement in place of the temporary cement. There were eight subjects presenting with fractures/chips to the composite component of the bridges. CONCLUSION: The 3-year results demonstrate fully functional successful restorations with no evidence of tooth intrusion and with stable bone levels at both teeth and implants.

Adult↗

A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic comparison of Astra Tech and Brånemark single tooth implants.

BACKGROUND: The soft tissues around single tooth implants differ fundamentally from the gingiva around natural teeth. There are very limited data comparing soft tissues around different implant systems. AIM: To assess whether the design characteristics of dental implants, particularly the implant-abutment junction, may affect the dimensions and health of the peri-implant soft tissues and radiographic bone levels. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Fifteen Astra Tech and 15 Brånemark single tooth implants that had been in function for a minimum of 2 years in 30 partially dentate subjects were examined for plaque accumulation, probing depth, and bleeding on probing and compared to contralateral healthy teeth. Standardized radiographs were taken to measure the most coronal bone to implant contact on the mesial and distal surfaces. In addition, samples of subgingival plaque were taken on paper points and examined by darkfield microscopy. RESULTS: Significantly higher mean probing depths (p < .001) and higher mean percentage of spirochetes (p = .003) were found at implants compared to teeth. In this sample, the Brånemark implants had significantly higher probing depths than the Astra Tech implants (median and interquartile range: Astra Tech 2.7 mm [2-3], Brånemark 3.3 mm [3-3.7] p = .026) and the most coronal bone to implant contact was closer to the implant-abutment junction in the Astra Tech implants (Astra Tech 0.6 mm [0.2-0.9], Brånemark 1.6 mm [1.4-2.0]. p < .001). CONCLUSION: Although there were statistically significant differences between the two implant systems, the clinical differences were small and probably reflect differences in the biologic width in relation to the location and design of the implant-abutment junction.

Adult↗

Minimal tooth preparation techniques for restorations with adhesive materials.

Dramatic progress over the past ten years in adhesive composite and glass ionomer materials has made possible innovative, minimal cavity designs. These designs, by conserving tooth tissue, maximize the strength of the remaining structure and facilitate the aesthetic preservation of the patient's own dentition. The author gives a critical review of some of the new techniques that have been proposed.

Acrylic Resins↗