PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Chèze

Publications and source records attributed to L Chèze.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

A non-invasive protocol to determine the personalized moment arms of knee and ankle muscles.

One difficulty that comes with predicting muscular forces is the accuracy of experimental data, particularly the assessment of muscle moment arms with respect to each joint rotation axis. This paper presents a non-invasive experimental protocol to obtain the personalized muscle moment arms with respect to the ankle and knee joints. A specific pointer is used by a specialist of lower limb anatomy in order to define the local portion of the line of action of the different muscles closed to the joint on the standing subject's lower limb. With this pointer, the three-dimensional coordinates of several points representing the line of action of 12 ankle and knee muscles are collected by a Motion Analysis system. The collection is done five times by the same operator and one time by two different operators. From this data, the intra and inter operator repeatabilities are tested. Relative (ICC) and absolute (SEM) reliabilities are determined in order to evaluate the intra operator repeatability of this non-invasive protocol. The ICC values obtained are higher than 0.91 for 10 among 12 muscles. The intra operator repeatability is thus confirmed. From the records realized by the two operators, the differences are negligible. Thus, the inter operator repeatability is also confirmed. The moments arms obtained using this non-invasive experimental protocol are compared with those calculated from origin and insertion points reported in the literature, according to the work of Whites, Pierrynowskis and Kepples, respectively. The estimations obtained using the non-invasive experimental protocol are found, for some muscles, more realistic than those calculated using the literature data and are always coherent with the role of the muscles described in anatomical books.

Adult↗

Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. body segment inertial parameters.

Body segment inertial parameters (BSIPs) are important data in biomechanics. They are usually estimated from predictive equations reported in the literature. However, most of the predictive equations are ambiguously applicable in the conventional 3D segment coordinate systems (SCSs). Also, the predictive equations reported in the literature all include two assumptions: the centre of mass and the proximal and distal endpoints are assumed to be aligned, and the inertia tensor is assumed to be principal in the segment axes. These predictive equations, restraining both position of the centre of mass and orientation of the principal axes of inertia, become restrictive when computing 3D inverse dynamics, when analyzing the influence of BSIP estimations on joint forces and moments and when evaluating personalized 3D BSIPs obtained from medical imaging. In the current study, the extensive data from McConville et al. (1980. Anthropometric relationships of body and body segment moments of inertia. AFAMRL-TR-80-119, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio) and from Young et al. (1983. Anthropometric and mass distribution characteristics of the adults female. Technical Report AFAMRL-TR-80-119, FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, Oklaoma City, Oklaoma) are adjusted in order to correspond to joint centres and to conventional segment axes. In this way, scaling equations are obtained for both males and females that provide BSIPs which are directly applicable in the conventional SCSs and do not restrain the position of the centre of mass and the orientation of the principal axes. These adjusted scaling equations may be useful for researchers who wish to use appropriate 3D BSIPs for posture and movement analysis.

Adult↗

[The trapezio-metacarpal joint: the strain of the ligaments as a function of the thumb position. Study on an enlarged model].

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to develop an enlarged anatomical model of the trapezio-metacarpal joint in order to measure the strains on the ligaments when this joint was passively moved in several directions under constant loading. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A model of the two first rays of the hand was made in polystyrene, at a X3 enlargement, and the ligaments substituted by rubber bands with well characterized mechanical properties so as to reproduce the actual ratio of stiffness (approximately = 10) of the different tissues (bones and ligaments) found in real life. The first metacarpal was moved in 6 directions as described by Ebskov (1970) and Pieron (1973, 1980) using a small spring exerting a constant force (1.5 N) tilted at 30 degrees with respect to the transverse plane. The strain was measured between two white marks for each model ligament and each direction respectively, and the percentage of lengthening was calculated. A statistical study was performed using the non-parametrical Test of Wilcoxon in order to compare the ligament strains obtained in the different directions of loading. RESULTS: The largest strains were observed in the intermetacarpal ligament and in the anterior oblique ligament reaching 26 to 39% in direction J (posteromedial) and in direction L (posterolateral). Deformations of the two parts of the dorsoradial ligament and of the posterior oblique ligament were equal or inferior to 12% and were observed in the other 4 directions: D, F, K, I (Anterolateral, maximal anteposition, anteromedial, medial) and their combinations. CONCLUSION: . These data may be useful for helping the understanding of the biomechanics of the basal joint of the thumb. Nevertheless, we are dealing here with a simplified model, which must be considered with caution if the results are to be applied to the living joint.

Carpometacarpal Joints↗

Fixed versus free-floating stretcher mechanism in rowing ergometers: mechanical aspects.

The mechanical responses (i.e. external contact forces and external power) of 25 elite rowers to a race-pace rowing protocol were investigated on the traditional fixed stretcher mechanism and the more recently introduced free-floating stretcher mechanism rowing ergometers. Using a Rowperfect rowing ergometer for both conditions, external contact forces at the handle, stretcher and sliding seat, as well as the displacements of the handle and stretcher, were recorded. The external power was calculated as the product of the force and velocity data from both the handle and stretcher. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the two conditions for each mechanical parameter were observed. The fixed condition showed larger maximum values for forces and external power and average power throughout the rowing cycle. Moreover, rowing with the fixed mechanism generated higher inertial forces during the transition between the propulsion and recovery phases, especially at the catch of the cycle. The results suggest that: (i) muscular coordination may differ according to the stretcher mechanism used, which could have an impact on the physiological adaptations of muscles; and (ii) the free-floating mechanism may induce lower catch and maximum values for net joint forces and net joint moments that could decrease the risk of injury.

Adult↗

[In vivo cinematic study of the trapezometacarpal joint].

The aim of this study was to assess the trapeziometacarpal joint kinematics from in vivo measurements, both quantifying the ranges of motion and suggesting a suitable joint model. A motion analysis system has been used to collect the spatial trajectories of markers, glued respectively on the thumb and on the hand's palm. A rigorous protocol was set up to make sure of the trapezoid bone's fixity relatively to the hand, and then to be able to characterize the movement of the first metacarpus with respect to the trapezium. The ranges of motion have been measured on two distinct movements: circumduction and flexion-extension, and different types of joints: healthy, pathological and prosthetic. The joint axes of rotation (for flexion-extension and ante-retroposition movements) have been determined on healthy subjects. The computation of rotation amplitudes and positions of joint axes was based upon the finite helical axis concept, which degenerates into finite rotation axis when translations can be neglected. Both the measurement protocol and the calculation method have been validated by comparing the computed joint center with that measured on a radiography, in the case of a spherical prosthesis. The ranges of motion obtained on the healthy subject series were consistent with values published by other authors. Comparisons have been realized between these reference joints and different cases: arthrodesis, arthrosis and prosthesis. The determination of rotation axes of a normal joint has lead to a generalized cardan joint, i.e. two non perpendicular converging rotation axes.

Algorithms↗

A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data.

When video-based motion analysis systems are used to measure segmental kinematics, the major source of error is the displacement of skin-fixed markers relative to the underlying skeletal structure. Such displacements cause the marker representation of the segment to deform, thereby decreasing the accuracy of subsequent three-dimensional kinematic calculations. We have developed a two-step solidification procedure to address this problem. First, the mean rigid shape is computed which best represents the time-varying marker configuration of each segment. Second, a least-squares minimization is used to replace the measured marker coordinates with those corresponding to the best-fit mean rigid shape. Rigid body theory can then be applied unambiguously to perform kinematic analyses. To evaluate this approach, we defined an unperturbed three-dimensional reference movement using kinematic data from the swing phase of gait. After perturbing the marker coordinates with artificial noise, the rotation matrix and translation vector (absolute and relative movement) between each pair of successive images were computed using (1) reference frames fixed directly to the perturbed marker coordinates, (2) a least-squares minimization procedure found in the literature, and (3) the proposed solidification procedure. The least-squares and solidification procedures produced extremely similar results which, relative to the direct calculation, reduced kinematic errors on average by 20-25% when the maximum distance between markers was small (e.g. < 15 cm). The solidification methodology therefore combines the numerical benefits of the least-squares method with the conceptual benefits of a rigid body method.

Algorithms↗