Biomedical subjects

L Cherney

Publications and source records attributed to L Cherney.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1997

Telephone support as an adjunct to transdermal nicotine in smoking cessation.

OBJECTIVES: Transdermal nicotine patches have shown considerable promise in improving smoking cessation outcomes. The present study assessed telephone support as an adjunct to a managed care-based, single-session group orientation smoking cessation program with nicotine patch therapy. METHODS: The unit of randomization was the orientation session (n = 35). Subjects (n = 509) were randomly assigned to a group session without telephone support, the session plus access to a toll-free help line, or the session with telephone help line plus active telephone outreach. RESULTS: Contrary to hypothesis, there were no differences between treatment conditions. Overall abstinence rates were 22% at 6 months and 21% at 1 year. Fewer than 1% of eligible subjects called the toll-free help line. An average of 3.8 of a possible 4 calls were completed in the telephone outreach condition. CONCLUSIONS: Abstinence results obtained in this program were comparable to those obtained with more extensive counseling. However, there was no evidence of benefit from telephone support beyond the initial physician-led group orientation session.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed1997

Nicotine replacement therapy in a group model HMO.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient response to a smoking cessation program that combined a nicotine replacement system (patch) with telephone support. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: A large Midwestern HMO. PARTICIPANTS. Five hundred and nine smokers who attended orientation sessions where an overview of the study and the use of the nicotine patch was presented. INTERVENTION: All subjects received a prescription for a nicotine replacement patch (Prostep, Lederle Laboratories, Wayne, NJ). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups. Group I participants (n = 166) received no additional support. Group II participants (n = 167) were registered with a 24-hour telephone hotline. Group III participants (n = 167) were registered with the 24-hour telephone hotline and received four follow-up telephone calls from health educators. OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was smoking cessation. Subject satisfaction with study components was also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference by group in smoking cessation rates: 20% of patients in all three groups were smoke-free after 12 months. Few patients (1%) used the telephone hotline. The telephone follow-up did not have an impact on cessation rates, and most patients (92%) reported that the orientation session was useful. CONCLUSIONS: The study experience has helped the HMO evaluate various study components and has had an impact on currently used telephone intervention strategies and educational materials.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed1996

Continuous quality improvement can improve glycemic control for HMO patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) intervention on glycemic control of patients with diabetes mellitus attending a primary care clinic. METHODS: A CQI process designed by the Minnesota Department of Health to improve diabetes care was implemented at a volunteer clinic, with another similar clinic not using the CQI process assessed for comparison. Adults with diabetes were identified at both clinics using diagnostic and pharmacy databases. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values (reference range, 4.3%-6.1%) and out-patient utilization and charges were compared for all patients with diabetes at each clinic for the 12 months before and 18 months after initiation of the CQI intervention. RESULTS: The mean HbA1c value at the intervention clinic fell from 8.9% at baseline to 8.4% at 12 months and to 7.9% at 18 months. The mean HbA1c value at the comparison clinic was 8.9% at baseline, 8.9% at 12 months, and 8.8% at 18 months (difference between clinics, t = 4.13, P < .001). Differences after the intervention in the proportion of patients at the comparison clinic (n = 121) vs the intervention clinic (n = 122) with HbA1c values of 8% or less (40% vs 51%), between 8% and 10% (33% vs 37%), and 10% or greater (27% vs 12%) were unlikely due to chance (chi 2 = 9.7, 2 df, P = .008). The intervention was not associated with increased utilization of outpatient visits or outpatient charges. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of nurses, physicians, and managers in a CQI process can improve patients' glycemic control in some health maintenance organization primary care settings, without increasing utilization or charges. Health maintenance organizations should consider CQI as one possible method to improve diabetes outcomes.

Adult↗