PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Condé-Salazar

Publications and source records attributed to L Condé-Salazar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Contact urticaria caused by heat-sensitive raw fish allergens.

Patients allergic to fish usually present with skin reactions after handling raw fish. Less frequently, these reactions are seen without symptoms after oral intake, often in chefs and food handlers. We have attempted to explain the skin selectivity of such reactions in a 36-year-old woman with contact urticaria after handling raw fish. We obtained aqueous extracts of raw and cooked fish (sole and hake) for in vivo (prick test) and in vitro (SDS-PAGE, IgE Immunoblot) tests. Prick-by-prick test, 20-min closed patch test, rub test with fresh and cooked fish (sole, hake and cod) and specific IgE (CAP-system) to sole, cod and hake were performed. The strength of positive reaction to raw fish was greater than to cooked fish on both prick and prick-by-prick testing. Rub tests showed positive responses only to raw fish. Specific IgEs to sole (45 KU/l), hake (66.9 KU/l) and cod (18.7 KU/l) were obtained. IgE immunoblot recognized 3 antigens of 25, 48, 56 kDa in raw sole and 1 of 42 kDa in raw hake extracts. No IgE binding was observed with the cooked extracts or control sera. Our findings strongly suggest a Type-I hypersensitivity to fish. Immunoblot analyses demonstrated a loss of specific IgE binding to cooked extracts. We have reported a case of contact urticaria caused by heat-sensitive raw-fish allergens in a patient who probably became sensitized via the cutaneous route.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis.

Patch testing is the predominant method of establishing contact allergy. The present patch test technique is the result of a continuous process of development and improvement since its first application in the late 19th century. The perfect patch test should give no false-positive and no false-negative reactions. The ideal patch test should also cause as few adverse reactions as possible, particularly no patch test sensitization. Even though the history and examination of a patient with suspected allergic contact dermatitis will give clues to possible sensitizers, it is not sufficient to patch test only with initially suspected sensitizers; unsuspected sensitizers used for patch testing frequently turn out to be the real cause of the dermatitis. Fortunately, a small number of substances are considered to account for the majority of delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Therefore, generally 20-25 test preparations consisting of chemically defined compounds, mixes of allergens, and natural and synthetic compounds, are grouped into a standard test series. The requirements to be fulfilled by a sensitizer in a standard patch test series are discussed in this article. A procedure of investigations is proposed before a sensitizer is included in a standard series.

Allergens↗
PubMed1995

Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in construction workers.

We report the patch test results of 449 construction workers who came as patients to the Occupational Dermatology Service of the Instituto Nacional de Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo in Madrid between 1989 and 1993. 90.8% of them were patch tested, because they had cutaneous lesions or a clinical history suggestive of occupational dermatitis. 65.5% (268) of those patch tested showed one or more reactions connected with their work. Chromate at 42.1% was the main allergen, followed by cobalt, 20.5%, nickel, 10%, and epoxy resin, 7.5%. 25.9% (106) of patients showed sensitization to rubber components, the majority at 23.7% to thiuram mix, with TETD being the main allergen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Sensitization to epoxy resin systems in special flooring workers.

The use of new products in building and public works is increasing, among them being special floor coverings containing epoxy resins and derivatives. These are used principally in heavily frequented areas, such as shopping precincts, hospitals, civic centres, etc., due to their high resistance to wear and tear, environmental factors, etc. In the last 2 years, we have studied 15 cases of men sensitized to epoxy resin, or derivatives, who worked with special floorings. Speed of sensitization, severity of lesions, and localization to the hands, face and legs were characteristic.

Adult↗