PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Cortigiani

Publications and source records attributed to L Cortigiani.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Pre-discharge stress echocardiography and exercise ECG for risk stratification after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: results of the COSTAMI-II (cost of strategies after myocardial infarction) trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial the relative merits of pre-discharge exercise ECG and early pharmacological stress echocardiography concerning risk stratification and costs of treating patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: 262 patients from six participating centres with a recent uncomplicated myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to early (day 3-5) pharmacological stress echocardiography (n = 132) or conventional pre-discharge (day 7-9) maximum symptom limited exercise ECG (n = 130). RESULTS: No complication occurred during either stress echocardiography or exercise ECG. At one year follow up there were 26 events (1 death, 5 non-fatal reinfarctions, 20 patients with unstable angina requiring hospitalisation) in patients randomly assigned to early stress echocardiography and 18 events (2 reinfarctions, 16 unstable angina requiring hospitalisation) in the group randomly assigned to exercise ECG (not significant). The negative predictive value was 92% for stress echocardiography and 88% for exercise ECG (not significant). Total costs of the two strategies were similar (not significant). CONCLUSION: Early pharmacological stress echocardiography and conventional pre-discharge symptom limited exercise ECG have similar clinical outcome and costs after uncomplicated infarction. Early pharmacological stress echocardiography should be considered a valid alternative even for patients with interpretable baseline ECG who can exercise.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Prognostic and clinical correlates of angiographically diffuse non-obstructive coronary lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To make a prospective assessment of the clinical and prognostic correlates of angiographically diffuse non-obstructive coronary lesions. DESIGN: Angiographic vessel and extent scores were calculated in 228 clinically stable patients (mean (SD) age, 60 (11) years; 43 women, 185 men) undergoing prospective follow up for the composite end point of death and myocardial infarction. The effect on outcome of clinical variables (age, sex, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, smoking habit, systemic hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, ejection fraction) and angiographic variables (vessel and extent score) was evaluated by Cox's proportion hazard model. RESULTS: The vessel score was 3 in 34 patients (15%), 2 in 78 (34%), 1 in 87 (38%), and 0 in 29 (13%). Median extent score was 60 (range 6-110; first quartile 40, third quartile 70). Forty one events (nine deaths and 32 myocardial infarcts) occurred over a median follow up period of 30 months. Age and extent score were the only multivariate predictors of outcome, but the latter provided 28% additional prognostic information after adjustment for the most predictive variables (gain in chi2 = 7, p < 0.01). A vessel score of 3 was associated with worse survival, while no significant discrimination was possible among the other groups. However, assignment of patients to two groups according to an ROC curve derived cut off value for the extent score made it possible to obtain significant discrimination of survival even in cases with vessel scores of 0 to 2. Age and diabetes were clinical markers of a higher extent score. CONCLUSIONS: The angiographic extent score is a powerful marker of adverse outcome independent of severity and the number of flow limiting coronary lesions, and may reflect the link between clinical risk profile and diffusion of coronary atherosclerosis. Thus it should be of clinical value for targeting aggressive preventive measures.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Vasodilator stress echocardiography for risk stratification of medically stabilized unstable angina.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to assess the safety, feasibility and prognostic value of dipyridamole-atropine stress echo in patients with medically stabilized unstable angina. METHODS: The initial population consisted of 173 patients consecutively admitted at two different Coronary Care Units with class IIIB unstable angina. Of these, 56 were excluded: five had poor acoustic window, 24 did not stabilize with medical therapy and underwent urgent coronary angiography, 26 evolved in non-Q wave myocardial infarction and one patient died. The remaining 117 patients underwent dipyridamole-atropine stress echo after 48 h without symptoms or electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischaemia. RESULTS: No complications or side effects occurred. An ischaemic response was found in 61 patients. During follow-up (10+/-9 months), three cardiac deaths, eight infarctions, 13 unstable anginas, and seven late (>3 months from stress testing) revascularizations occurred. There were 22 events (36%) in patients with, and nine events (16%) in patients without, inducible ischaemia (P=0.01). At Cox analysis peak-stress wall-motion score index (HR=5.5; 95% CI, 1.9 to 15.5; P=0.0015), and admission ST-segment depression (HR=4.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 10.7; P=0.0022) were independent predictors of spontaneous events (cardiac death, infarction, unstable angina). The 12-month event-free survival was 69% for ischaemic and 83% for non-ischaemic group (P=0.03). In considering major events as end-points (spontaneous events, and late revascularization), again multivariate prognostic indicators were peak-stress wall-motion score index (HR=14.2; 95% CI, 2.6 to 76.6; P=0.0021), and admission ST-segment depression (HR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.9; P=0.0055). The 12-month event-free survival rate was 58% for ischaemic and 81% for non-ischaemic group (P=0.002). With an interactive stepwise procedure, stress echo findings were found to provide incremental prognostic contribution to that of clinical data alone. CONCLUSIONS: With proper selection of patients, dipyridamole-atropine stress echo is extremely safe and feasible in patients with medically stabilized unstable angina, and can be useful in identification of subjects at risk for future cardiac events.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Prognostic significance of the dobutamine echocardiography test in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Dobutamine stress echo provides potentially useful information on idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). From February 1, 1997, to October 1, 1999, 186 patients (131 men and 55 women, mean age 56 +/- 12 years) with IDC, ejection fraction <35%, and angiographically normal coronary arteries were studied by high-dose (up to 40 micro/kg/min) dobutamine echo in 6 centers, all quality controlled for stress echo reading. In all patients, wall motion score index (WMSI) (from 1 = normal to 4 = dyskinetic in a 16- segment model of the left ventricle) was evaluated by echo at baseline and peak dobutamine. One hundred eighty-four patients were followed up (mean 15 +/- 13 months) and only cardiac death was considered as an end point. There were 29 cardiac deaths. Significant parameters for survival prediction at univariate analysis are: DeltaWMSI (chi-square 20.1; p <0.0000), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (chi-square 17.57; p <0.0000), rest ejection fraction (chi-square 10.41; p = 0.0013), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (chi-square 8.23; p = 0.0041), and hypertension (chi-square 8.08, p = 0.0045). In the multivariate stepwise analysis only DeltaWMSI and NYHA were independent predictors of outcome (DeltaWMSI = hazard ratio 0.02, p < 0.0000; NYHA class = hazard ratio 3.83, p < 0.0000). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed a better outcome for patients with a large inotropic response (DeltaWMSI > or =0.44, a cutoff identified by receiver-operating characteristic curves analysis) than for those with a small or no myocardial inotropic response to dobutamine (93.6% vs 69.4%, p = 0.00033). Thus, in patients with IDC, an extensive contractile reserve identified by high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography is associated with a better survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Clinical and angiographic correlates of dobutamine-induced wall motion patterns after myocardial infarction.

The ability of different dobutamine-induced wall motion patterns to define the anatomic status of the infarct-related artery (IRA) was evaluated in 159 patients who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and coronary angiography 10 +/- 2 and 18 +/- 3 days, respectively, after hospital admission. The DSE result was classified as: (1) biphasic: improvement with a low dose followed by deterioration with a high dose; (2) worsening: direct deterioration at low or high doses; (3) sustained improvement: improvement with a low dose that was maintained at high dose; and (4) no change: no change during the entire protocol. A diameter narrowing >70% (50% for the left main stem) of major coronary arteries indicated a severe lesion. Angiograms were classified according to the jeopardy score and collateral circulation graded according to Rentrop's classification. DSE was positive in 92 patients (22 had biphasic results and 70 had worsening results) and negative in 67 patients (14 had sustained improvement and 53 had no changes). Biphasic response was associated with more frequent anterior infarction (p <0.05) and higher resting (p <0.001) and peak (p <0.01) wall motion score indexes. The IRA was totally occluded in 4 of the 92 patients (4%) with positive (worsening pattern) and 12 of the 67 patients (18%) with negative (no change pattern) tests. The biphasic pattern was associated with the highest jeopardy score and was significantly (p <0.05) more specific (100%) compared with worsening (78%) in identifying a severe stenosis of the IRA. The combination of ischemic patterns provided a significantly superior sensitivity (p <0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified the biphasic pattern as the only significant predictor. Conversely, the prediction of total occlusion of the IRA was poor. Sustained improvement was the most specific (100%) predictor of absence of severe stenosis of the IRA, whereas the combination with no change pattern provided a significantly superior sensitivity (p <0.0001). Thus, DSE effectively predicts the residual stenosis of the IRA. In particular, the biphasic response has an excellent specificity and positive predictive value and is the only significant predictor among clinical and echocardiographic variables.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2001

Prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block.

PURPOSE: Although coronary artery disease is a frequent cause of left bundle branch block, the prognostic value of myocardial ischemia in patients with this conduction abnormality has not been defined. We investigated the value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with left bundle branch block. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred eighty-seven patients [230 men and 157 women, mean (+/- SD) age, 64 +/- 9 years] with complete left bundle branch block on the resting electrocardiogram underwent dobutamine (n = 217) or dipyridamole (n = 170) stress echocardiography to evaluate suspected or known coronary artery disease. A summary wall motion score (on a one to four scale) was calculated. The primary end points were cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A positive echocardiographic result (evidence of ischemia) was detected in 109 (28%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 29 +/- 26 months, there were 21 cardiac deaths and 20 myocardial infarctions, 63 patients underwent coronary revascularization, and 1 patient received a heart transplant. In a multivariate analysis, four clinical and echocardiographic variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac death: resting wall motion score index [hazard ratio (HR) = 7.5 per unit; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8 to 20; P = 0.001], previous myocardial infarction (HR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.3; P = 0.02), diabetes (HR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.6; P = 0.03), and the change in wall motion score index from rest to peak stress (HR = 3.0 per unit; 95% CI, 1.0 to 8.6; P = 0.04). The 5-year survival was 77% in the ischemic group and 92% in the nonischemic group (P = 0.02). Four variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac death or infarction: previous myocardial infarction (HR = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.8; P = 0.0005), diabetes (HR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.6; P = 0.01), resting wall motion score index (HR = 2.2 per unit; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.1; P = 0.02), and positive echocardiographic result (HR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.5; P = 0.03). The 5-year infarction-free survival was 60% in the ischemic group and 87% in the nonischemic group (P < 0.0001). Stress echocardiography significantly improved risk stratification in patients without previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.0001), but not in those with previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.08). In particular, it provided additional value over clinical and resting echocardiographic findings in predicting cardiac events among patients without previous infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial ischemia during pharmacologic stress echocardiography is a strong prognostic predictor in patients with left bundle branch block, particularly in those without previous myocardial infarction.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2001

The incremental prognostic value of pharmacological stress echo over exercise electrocardiography in women with chest pain of unknown origin.

AIMS: The value of exercise electrocardiography in evaluating women with suspected coronary artery disease is limited. Conversely, stress echocardiography is effective for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes in females. The purpose of the study was to determine the relative prognostic value of exercise electrocardiography and pharmacological stress echocardiography in a cohort of women with chest pain of unknown origin, in order to verify whether criteria could be established for the daily non-invasive evaluation of such a low-risk profile population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Exercise electrocardiography and pharmacological stress echocardiography (171 dipyridamole, 73 dobutamine) were performed in 244 women (age 60+/-10 years) with chest pain and known coronary artery disease. A positive result of exercise electrocardiography (ST-segment shift > or =1 mm at 80 ms after the J point) was detected in 95 patients; a positive result of stress echocardiography (new regional wall motion abnormalities) was observed in 33 patients. During follow-up (36+/-18 months), two deaths, five infarctions, seven unstable anginas, and 11 coronary revascularizations occurred. Using Cox analysis, the positive result of stress echocardiography (odds ratio=40.1) alone, was independently related to hard cardiac events (death, infarction). With spontaneous cardiac events (death, infarction, and unstable angina) as end-points, the multivariate prognostic predictors were a positive result of stress echocardiography (odds ratio=37.0), a family history of coronary artery disease (odds ratio=4.1), typical chest pain (odds ratio=3.7), and a positive exercise electrocardiography result with a rate-pressure product < or =20 000 (odds ratio=3.5). By adopting an interactive stepwise procedure, the prognostic value of stress echocardiography was incremental to that of clinical and exercise electrocardiography data. Nevertheless, the negative result of exercise electrocardiography and pharmacological stress predicted a very high and comparable (P=ns) 24-month survival rate when both hard and spontaneous cardiac events were taken as end-points. CONCLUSIONS: In women with chest pain, stress echocardiography is a strong and independent prognostic indicator, incremental to that shown by exercise electrocardiography. However, the two tests have a similar high negative predictive value in this population. Therefore, exercise electrocardiography has to be considered the initial approach and the only test when the result is negative, whereas stress echocardiography is warranted in selected conditions, including those in women with uninterpretable electrocardiograms, those unable to exercise maximally, and those with an ambiguous or ischaemic response to exercise electrocardiography.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

The prognostic value of myocardial viability recognized by low dose dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of myocardial viability recognized as a contractile response to vasodilator stimulation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction in a large scale, prospective, multicentre, observational study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and seven patients (mean age 60 +/- 10 years) with angiographically proven coronary artery disease, previous (>3 months) myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <35%; mean ejection fraction: 28 +/- 7%) were enrolled in the study. Each patient underwent low dose dipyridamole echo (0.28 mg x kg(-1) in 4 min). Myocardial viability was identified as an improvement of >0.20 in the wall motion score index. By selection, all patients were followed up for a median of 36 months. One-hundred and twenty-four were revascularized either by coronary artery bypass grafting (n=83) or coronary angioplasty (n=41). The only end-point analysed was cardiac death. In the revascularized group, cardiac death occurred in one of the 41 patients with and in 16 of the 83 patients without a viable myocardium (2.4% vs 19.3%, P<0.01). Outcome, as estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival, was better for patients with, compared to patients without, a viable myocardium, who underwent coronary revascularization (97.6 vs 77.4%, P=0.01). Using a Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of myocardial viability was shown to exert a protective effect on survival (chi-square 4.6, hazard ratio 0.1, 95% CI 0.01-0.8, P<0.03). The survival rate in medically treated patients was lower than in revascularized patients irrespective of the presence of a viable myocardium (79.7% vs 86.2, P=ns). CONCLUSION: In severe left ventricular ischaemic dysfunction, myocardial viability, as assessed by low dose dipyridamole echo, is associated with improved survival in revascularized patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic assessment of single-vessel coronary artery disease: focus on stress echocardiography.

AIMS: Revascularization procedures are increasingly applied in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease in spite of the fact that a prognostic benefit has been proved only for soft end-points. This review summarizes the results of stress echocardiography in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with single-vessel disease using stress (exercise, dobutamine, adenosine and dipyridamole) echocardiography are focused upon in the light of pathophysiological considerations and the results of clinical studies. Factors affecting test accuracy are individually addressed and comparisons made with different stress testing modalities, including exercise electrocardiography and nuclear techniques. Finally, therapeutic options are discussed and the superior accuracy of the physiological assessment of coronary stenosis as compared to the simple anatomic evaluation emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with single-vessel disease represent an anatomically heterogeneous group. Although the suboptimal performance of any technique in their evaluation has to be acknowledged, stress echocardiography can effectively contribute to selection of the management strategy.

Cardiotonic Agents↗
PubMed2001

The stress echo prognostic gender gap.

AIMS: To investigate whether myocardial ischaemia elicitable during pharmacological stress echocardiography portends different prognosis in men and women. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group was made by 1733 patients (941 men, 792 women) who underwent dipyridamole (n=1008) or dobutamine (n=725) stress echo for evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease. An ischaemic response was found in 460 patients (308 men, 152 women). Considering the whole ischaemic population, women were older (P<0.0001) and more likely to have hypertension (P=0.02) and hypercholesterolaemia (P=0.04) than men. No difference in age and risk factors was evidenced between the two sexes in the subset of 203 patients with ischaemia and suspected coronary artery disease. During follow-up (25 +/- 24 months for the ischaemic and 37 +/- 25 months for the non-ischaemic sample), there were 113 cardiac events (45 deaths and 68 infarctions) and 232 revascularizations. Revascularization rate in ischaemic population was similar in both sexes (P=0.36). Multivariate predictors of cardiac events in the whole ischaemic group were resting WMSI (HR=2.7, 95% CI 1.3--3.3;P=0.0050), female gender (HR=2.2, 95% CI 1.2--3.7;P=0.0062), age > or = l65 years (HR=1.9, 95% CI=1.0--3.6;P=0.0427), and Delta WMSI (HR=2.1, 95% CI=1.0--3.7;P=0.0447). Female gender (HR=2.7, 95% CI 1.1--6.3;P=0.0233) was the only independent prognostic predictor in patients with ischaemia and suspected coronary artery disease. Five-year infarction-free survival was 82% in men and 71% in women in the whole ischaemic population (P=0.0041) as well as in the ischaemic group with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (P=0.0175). In the non-ischaemic sample resting WMSI (HR=4.8), history of myocardial infarction (HR=2.5), and hypercholesterolaemia (HR=1.8) were independent predictors of outcome at multivariate analysis, whilst the gender had no prognostic importance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that female gender is an independent predictor of cardiac events in patients with myocardial ischaemia induced by pharmacological stress echocardiography.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

Safety, feasibility, and prognostic implications of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in 1482 patients evaluated in an ambulatory setting.

BACKGROUND: The outpatient prognostic assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) by exercise electrocardiography has limitations, including the feasibility of the test and its low positive predictive value in several clinical conditions. In the current study we investigated the safety, feasibility, and prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in a large cohort of ambulatory patients. METHODS: The study group was made of 1482 ambulatory patients (969 men, aged 60 +/- 10 years) who underwent stress echocardiography with either dipyridamole (n = 846) or dobutamine (n = 636) for evaluation of suspected or known stable CAD. The pretest likelihood of CAD was intermediate (<70%) in 709 patients and high (> or =70%) in 773 patients. RESULTS: There was no complication during the dipyridamole test, whereas 2 ischemia-dependent, sustained ventricular tachycardias occurred during the dobutamine test. Limiting side effects were observed in 2% of dipyridamole and in 3% of dobutamine stresses. The echocardiogram was positive in 459 patients. During a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 24 months, 58 patients died, 33 had a nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 158 underwent early (< or =3 months) and 64 late (>3 months) revascularization. Multivariate predictors of hard events (death, infarction) were positive echocardiographic results (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9) and resting wall motion score index (WMSI) (HR 2.3). In considering major events (death, infarction, late revascularization) as end points, positive echocardiographic result (HR 4.3), scar (HR 2.2), and resting WMSI (HR 1.7) were independent prognostic predictors. The 5-year survival rates for the ischemic and nonischemic groups were, respectively, 80% and 91% (HR 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-8.4; P <.0001) considering hard cardiac events and 65% and 88% (HR 2.6, 95% CI 2.1-5.9; P <.0001) considering major events. Multivariate predictors of major events were positive echocardiographic results (HR 8.2) and male sex (HR 2.5) for the intermediate-risk group and positive echocardiographic results (HR 2.9), resting WMSI (HR 1.8), and prior Q-wave myocardial infarction (HR 1.8) for the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacologic stress echocardiography is safe, highly feasible, and effective in prognostic assessment of ambulatory patients when both a general population and groups selected on the basis of pretest likelihood of CAD are analyzed. It represents a valid complementary tool to exercise electrocardiography for prognostic purposes in outpatients.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2001

Angiographic and prognostic correlates of cardiac output by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with anterior myocardial infarction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac output assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and left ventricular dysfunction. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Forty-six patients with AMI (7 female patients; mean +/- SD age, 55 +/- 8 years; ejection fraction, 39 +/- 7%) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and coronary angiography following hospital discharge. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Cardiac output was estimated from oxygen uptake (VO(2)) during exercise according to a method based on the linear regression between arteriovenous oxygen content difference and percent maximum VO(2). Angiograms were scored using Gensini and Duke "jeopardy" scores. Cardiac output at anaerobic threshold (COAT) < or = 7.3 L/min was the best cutoff value for identifying multivessel coronary artery disease (relative risk, 3.1). Angiographic scores were significantly higher in patients with COAT < 7.3 L/min as compared to those with COAT > 7.3 L/min (82 +/- 8 vs 53 +/- 7 and 6 +/- 2 vs 4 +/- 3, respectively; p < 0.05) and were inversely and significantly correlated to COAT. Conversely, no correlation was found with ECG changes. COAT, VO(2) at anaerobic threshold, and peak VO(2) were univariate prognostic indicators. However, using Cox's model, COAT was the only multivariate predictor of outcome (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.9). Moreover, COAT < 7.3 L/min was associated to an increased risk of further cardiac events (odds ratio, 5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 17) and provided a significant discrimination of survival for the combined end point of cardiac death, reinfarction, and clinically driven revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: COAT is a safe and feasible tool providing additional diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with AMI.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Stress echocardiography for risk stratification of diabetic patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in diabetic patients; therefore, their risk stratification is a relevant issue. Because exercise tolerance is frequently impaired in these patients, pharmacological stress echocardiography (SE) has been suggested as a valuable alternative. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of this technique in diabetic patients with known or suspected CAD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 259 consecutive diabetic patients underwent pharmacological SE (dobutamine in 108 patients and dipyridamole in 151 patients) and follow-up for 24 +/- 22 months. A comparison between the prognostic value of SE and exercise electrocardiography (ECG) was made in a subgroup of 120 subjects. RESULTS: A total of 13 cardiac deaths and 13 nonfatal infarctions occurred during follow-up, and 58 patients were revascularized. Univariate predictors of outcome were known CAD, positive SE, rest and peak wall motion score index (WMSI), and peak/rest WMSI variation. Peak WMSI was the only significant and independent prognostic indicator (odds ratio 11; 95% CI 4-29, P < 0.0001) on multivariate Cox's analysis. After adjustment for the most predictive clinical and exercise ECG variables, SE provided 43% additional prognostic information (gain in X(2) = 7, P < 0.01). Moreover, positive SE was associated with a significantly lower event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: SE effectively predicts cardiac events in diabetic patients with known or suspected CAD and adds additional prognostic information as compared with exercise ECG.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2001

[Effectiveness and adequacy of management of acute coronary syndromes].

A rational utilization of resources represents a key issue in modern treatment of cardiac patients. The aim of our study was to highlight a few essential aspects for an efficient and appropriate management of patients with an acute coronary syndrome. Clinical evaluation of the patient's risk (i.e. clinical assessment of the probability of developing a cardiac event), incremental value of the chosen test for risk stratification, value of a strategy in modifying outcome and direct determinants of medical cost of the strategy are selected as the main aspects to be considered in order to optimize management of these patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease: the role of stress echocardiography.

Echocardiography combined with either exercise or pharmacological stress is a widely used method for the noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease. This is due to the high diagnostic accuracy that does not differ substantially among the various stress modalities. In addition, stress echocardiography has a useful role in risk stratification of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In particular, evidence of inducible ischemia is predictive of an unfavorable outcome, whilst its absence is associated with a very low risk of future cardiac events. These findings have strong implications in clinical decision-making. One of the main characteristics of the echographic marker of ischemia is that it is significantly more specific than the electrocardiographic one. The higher specificity of stress echocardiography translates into increased prognostic value as compared to exercise electrocardiography. Nevertheless, exercise electrocardiography has a very high negative predictive value. Moreover, compared to stress echocardiography it is safer, simpler, less costly and requires no specific competence. Based on these data, exercise electrocardiography remains the cornerstone of the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Stress echocardiography, on the other hand, is particularly useful in those cases when exercise electrocardiography is not feasible, non-interpretable (owing to the presence of left bundle branch block or of a pacemaker or of other electrocardiographic baseline abnormalities), or when it gives inconclusive data, or a positive result at an intermediate or high workload (in such cases, precise knowledge of the site and extension of ischemia can be of crucial importance in deciding between conservative and aggressive treatment), as well as in cases in which ischemia during the test is frequently a false positive response, as in hypertensive patients, in women and in all cases of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Coronary Disease↗