PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Crinò

Publications and source records attributed to L Crinò.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

[Medical treatment of pulmonary neoplasms].

Over the past 20 years, the treatment of lung cancer has improved significantly: platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard treatment in locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer disease because of its impact on survival and quality of life. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy may also play an important role in the betterment of the outcome of earlier stages of disease. New drugs have become part of the therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine, taxanes, irinotecan, and vinorelbine have been shown, alone or in combination with platinum derivatives, to interfere with the natural history of disease. As far as small cell lung cancer is concerned, the combination of chemotherapy (cisplatin and etoposide) and radiation therapy has yielded long term survivals in excess of 20%. The role of non-platinum combinations, particularly in the elderly and in patients with poor performance status as well as salvage therapy in patients relapsed after platinum treatment, will be the object of ongoing and future studies. Also the significance of newer agents, such as anti-angiogenesis factors and growth factor receptor inhibitors, used either alone or in combination with standard cytotoxic regimens, will have to be evaluated.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2001

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

A number of randomized clinical trials now support the conclusion that the combined-modality regimen that includes gemcitabine (Gemzar) and cisplatin (Platinol) may improve survival in disseminated non-small-cell lung cancer. Cisplatin is considered to be the "backbone" of this combination chemotherapy due to its proven activity. The regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin has been tested and is now considered among the most active combinations in the treatment of disseminated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2000

A three-week schedule of gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with two different cisplatin dose levels: a phase II randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: To explore a new schedule of gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) combination therapy using two different cisplatin doses in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May to December 1997, 92 chemonaive patients entered the study and 88 (28 with locally advanced and 60 with disseminated NSCLC) were evaluable for response and toxicity (45 in arm A and 43 in arm B). Patients were randomly assigned to arm A or arm B. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was given on days 1-8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 in arm A and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 in arm B on day 2 of every 21-day cycle. RESULTS: The overall response rates in arms A and B were 42% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.8%-56.7%) and 47% (95% CI: 31.6%-61.5%), respectively. Median duration of response was 9.7 months (range 1.8 to 30.9 months; 13.1 and 9.5 months for arm A and B, respectively), and median survival was 12 months (range 0.2 to 31.1 months; 15.4 and 11.5 months for arm A and B, respectively). Major WHO grade 3-4 toxicities in arm A vs. arm B included: thrombocytopenia (23% vs. 17% of courses), leukopenia (15%, vs. 4% of courses), anemia (7% vs. 6% of courses), and nausea-vomiting (20% vs. 7% of patients). Grade 1-2 nephrotoxicity occurred in 20% of patients in arm A and in 7% of patients in arm B, with one grade 4 episode in arm A. Six patients discontinued treatment because of toxicities, 5 in arm A and I in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial indicate that both schedules are feasible and active, with a milder toxicity in the arm with the lower cisplatin dose.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium: a phase II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy in patients with advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two chemonaïve patients with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 70 were treated with cisplatin 35 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (30 min i.v. infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 every twenty-eight days. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for efficacy. Half had visceral disease. There were seven complete (18%) and nine partial responses (24%), for a response rate of 42% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 26%-59%). Responses were independently reviewed. Median response duration was 13.5 months (95% CI: 8.5-18.1 months), median time to progressive disease 7.2 months (95% CI: 4.0-9.1 months) and median survival 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.1-18.7 months); one-year survival was 52%. Laboratory toxicities included leucopenia (44% grade 3; 17% grade 4), neutropenia (25% grade 3; 33% grade 4) and thrombocytopenia (29% grade 3; 49% grade 4). Four patients had grade 4 symptomatic toxicity (three nausea and vomiting, one diarrhoea). There were no grade 4 infections and no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is active in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The weekly schedule of cisplatin is considered inappropriate.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized phase III study of the Italian Lung Cancer Project.

PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC) chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB (limited to T4 for pleural effusion and N3 for supraclavicular lymph nodes) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The end points were the evaluation of quality of life (QoL), response rates, survival, and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seven patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 28 days, or mitomycin 6 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 3,000 mg/m(2), and mesna on day 1 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 28 days. The whole-blood cell count was repeated on day 1 in both arms and weekly in the GC arm before each gemcitabine administration. RESULTS: No major differences in changes in QoL were observed between the two treatment arms. The objective response rate was 38% in the GC arm compared with 26% in the MIC arm (P =.029). The median survival time was 8.6 months in the GC arm and 9.6 months in the MIC arm (P =.877, log-rank test). Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly worse in the GC arm (64% v 28%, P <.001), whereas grade 3 and 4 alopecia was reported more commonly in the MIC arm (39% v 12%, P <. 001). CONCLUSION: We report an increased response rate without changes in QoL and a similar overall survival, time to progression, and time to treatment failure for the GC when compared with the MIC regimen in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Gemcitabine as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine as a single agent in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after recurrence or failure of previous treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1995 to October 1997, 83 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) once a week for 3 weeks every 28 days. Responses were assessed every two treatment courses. The median age of the patients was 63 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 to 1 in 62 patients and 2 in 21 patients. The predominant histology was squamous (39 patients); 49 patients had stage IV disease and 34 patients had stage III disease (33 stage IIIB and one stage IIIA). RESULTS: Sixteen patients (19%) achieved a partial response to treatment; the median duration of response was 29 weeks (range, 6 to 50 weeks). Treatment was well tolerated: grade 2 to 3 (World Health Organization standardized response criteria) leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% and 20% of patients, respectively. Mild asthenia was observed in 16% of patients, and peripheral edema in 5% of patients. Nausea and vomiting were present in 16% of patients. CONCLUSION: In this experience, gemcitabine showed significant activity without relevant toxicity, mainly in patients who were previously responsive to chemotherapy. This suggests a possible role for gemcitabine as a second-line treatment in patients who had a previous response or achieved stable disease with a platinum-containing regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Chemotherapy with cisplatin and teniposide for cerebral metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.

Twenty-three patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (median age 62 years, Karnofsky PS 50-100) were treated with cisplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1) and teniposide (80 mg/m2, days 1, 3 and 5) every 3 weeks. Response was evaluated by contrast-enhanced brain CT every two to three cycles of treatment. The objective response rate of brain metastases was 35% (8/23); three patients achieved complete response (CR) and five partial response (PR). The median response duration was 24 weeks for CR patients and 32 weeks for PR patients. The median survival was 21 weeks overall and 45 weeks for responding patients. Grade 3/4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 28 and 9%, respectively. Two patients died from infections while in neutropenia. Cisplatin and teniposide seems an active regimen against brain metastases in NSCLC. These data may indicate the need for reconsideration of the role of chemotherapy for brain metastases of NSCLC.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Bolus versus 5-day continuous infusion of cisplatin with mitomycin and vindesine in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase III prospective randomised trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC).

The aim of this randomised trial was to compare the efficacy of bolus versus continuous infusion cisplatin combined with mitomycin C and vindesine (MVP) for chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 97 patients (49 given bolus cisplatin-arm A and 48 given continuous infusion cisplatin--arm B) were evaluable for response. In arm A, 2 patients achieved a complete response (CR), 21 achieved a partial response (PR), whilst in arm B, 14 patients achieved a PR (29%) (P = 0.07). Median survival was 8 months in both arms. Myelosuppression was the most frequent and severe toxicity, with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 leucopenia in arm A when compared with arm B (44% versus 25%). In conclusion, there is no advantage for a cisplatin 5 day infusion in the MVP regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Gemcitabine as second-line treatment for relapsing or refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

We investigated the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine as a single agent in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after recurrence or failure of previous treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. From November 1995 to October 1997, 83 patients (73 men and 10 women) with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on a weekly x 3 every 4 weeks schedule. Responses were assessed every two treatment courses. The median age of the patients was 63 years. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0-1 in 62 patients; 2 in 21 patients. The predominant histology was squamous (39 patients); 49 patients had stage IV disease and 34 patients had stage III disease (33 stage IIIB and I stage IIIA). Sixteen patients (19%) achieved a partial response to treatment; the median duration of response was 29 weeks (range, 6 to 50 weeks). Treatment was well-tolerated: leukopenia and thrombocytopenia World Health Organization grade 2-3 occurred in 23% and 20% of patients, respectively. Mild asthenia was observed in 16% of patients and peripheral edema was observed in 5% of patients. Nausea and vomiting were present in 16% of patients. In this study, gemcitabine showed significant activity in a patient population usually associated with poor prognosis. This finding suggests a possible role for gemcitabine as second-line treatment in patients who have recurring disease or who have failed a platinum-containing regimen, and in the absence of significant toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Combined cisplatin and gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer: influence of scheduling on toxicity and drug delivery.

The scheduling of cytotoxic chemotherapy has important bearing on the toxicity and ability to deliver chemotherapy at or close to full dose. We report new data on the influence of different schedules of cisplatin and gemcitabine on toxicity and drug delivery in phase II studies of non-small cell lung cancer. Patients in six phase II studies had standard entry criteria for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Whereas gemcitabine was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle in all these studies, the scheduling of cisplatin varied and was given either on day 1, day 2, day 15 (in two studies), or days 1, 8, and 15 (in two studies). The protocol dose per infusion for gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m2 (five studies) and 1,500 mg/m2 (one study); for cisplatin, it was 100 mg/m2 when given once per cycle and 30 mg/m2 when given on days 1, 8, and 15. Similar dose reduction schedules were implemented in the event of grade 3 or higher drug toxicity for all studies except for the day 1 cisplatin study, in which the dose was omitted for grade 2 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was very low. Hematologic toxicity was moderate, and in patients who developed grade 3 or 4 toxicity, there was no hemorrhage from thrombocytopenia and neutropenic sepsis was rare. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia with the day 1, day 2, day 15 (two studies combined), and days 1, 8, and 15 (two studies combined) cisplatin regimens was 50%, 52%, 26%, and 38%. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia with these four regimens was 51%, 37%, 56%, and 49%, respectively. Although the hematologic toxicity might appear relatively similar, it represents the toxicity at the administered rather than the intended (protocol) dose, because drug delivery was reduced or omitted in the event of grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Differences between the schedules are revealed by analysis of the actual dosages delivered. The median dosage of gemcitabine per scheduled infusion was statistically higher with the day 15 cisplatin regimens (combined) compared with any of the other regimens treating at 1,000 mg/m2 (P < .003, z-score). The dose with the day 1, day 2, day 15, and days 1, 8, and 15 cisplatin regimens was 664, 829, 889, and 774 mg/m2, respectively. Both the percentages of cycles in which gemcitabine infusions were given at full dose and in which there were no omissions of gemcitabine infusions (including infusions with dose reductions) were statistically higher in the day 15 cisplatin regimen than with any of the other regimens (P < .0001, chi-square test). The percentage of cycles containing full-dose gemcitabine with the day 1, day 2, day 15, and days 1, 8, and 15 cisplatin regimens was 24%, 44%, 75%, and 46%, respectively. The percentage of cycles in which there were no omissions of gemcitabine infusions for the four regimens above was 32%, 55%, 83%, and 72%, respectively. Apart from the once-weekly regimen (days 1, 8, and 15) in which the protocol gemcitabine dose was 1,250 mg/m2, the day 15 cisplatin schedule allowed for the highest median concentration of gemcitabine. More importantly, the day 15 cisplatin schedule provided the longest duration of gemcitabine exposure, which is particularly important for its activity as gemcitabine is a phase-specific agent. The day 15 cisplatin schedule is associated with the best dose intensity and the longest median duration of exposure to gemcitabine, and best meets the goal of administering both agents at full doses in combination.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Combination therapy with gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer.

The nucleoside analogue, gemcitabine, has shown activity as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), producing consistent response rates of 20% and above. Because of its unique mechanism of action and its non-overlapping toxicity with other active agents, gemcitabine is an attractive candidate for trials in combination with other cytotoxic agents. In preclinical models, the cisplatin-gemcitabine combination suggested synergy between the two drugs. In phase I-II studies, response rates are as high as 54% when gemcitabine is combined with cisplatin, both in stage III and IV NSCLC. The combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide is also being explored with an overall response rate of 32%. The gemcitabine-containing regimens showed a favourable safety-efficacy profile and compared well with standard regimens used in NSCLC. These preliminary results must be validated by large randomised trials comparing gemcitabine-containing regimens with NSCLC reference chemotherapy regimens.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1997

A better therapeutic profile for the combination of mitomycin-C, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a useful dose-schedule modification.

BACKGROUND: In our previous experience with chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the combination of mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) showed the highest activity in a three-arm randomized trial; the MIC regimen also yielded the most toxic effects, with 8% WHO grade 2-4 nephrotoxicity, 21% grade 3-4 leukopenia and 10% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. In that study cisplatin (120 mg/m2) was delivered on day 1 and ifosfamide and mitomycin on day 2. In an effort to reduce MIC toxicity a modified regimen was tested in a phase II trial: cisplatin 100 mg/m2 was given on day 2 and ifosfamide on day 1 with mitomycin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1993 to December 1995, 70 advanced NSCLC patients entered the trial. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 70 patients achieved major response (41%) with 6 complete (9%) and 23 partial remissions (33%). We recorded 4% of WHO grade 3-4 anemia, and 2% of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the activity of the MIC regimen in NSCLC, and the modified schedule seems to substantially improve the safety of the combination.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Cisplatin-gemcitabine combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: The nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, has shown activity as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its combination with cisplatin in preclinical models suggested synergy between the two drugs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of the cisplatin-gemcitabine combination in advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive previously untreated NSCLC patients entered the trial from January to June 1994. The median age was 60 years (range, 37 to 70) and performance status (PS) was 0 or 1; 22 patients had unresectable stage III disease (21 stage IIIB and one stage IIIA) and 26 had stage IV disease. Gemcitabine 1 g/m2 was administered weekly (days 1, 8, and 15) followed by a 1-week rest and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2 of each 28-day cycle. Survival and response were determined in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Of 48 assessable patients, one (stage IV) had a complete response (CR) and 25 achieved a partial response (PR). The overall response rate was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 68%). Thrombocytopenia was the main side effect, with 52% of patients experiencing grade III to IV toxicity, which was usually short-lived and responsible for the omission of gemcitabine administration on day 15 in 50% of chemotherapy courses. The median survival time was 61.5 weeks (95% CI, 40 to 71). CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin induced a high response rate in both stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, with modest side effects. The regimen deserves further careful evaluation in a phase III prospective randomized trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Conservative surgery and quality of life in a young patient with synchronous bilateral embryonal carcinoma.

Synchronous bilateral testicular germ cell tumours are rare. We report a case with retroperitoneal node involvement (stage IIb). Testis-sparing surgery, followed by systemic PEB chemotherapy, was performed instead of bilateral radical orchiectomy plus retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. A good quality of life was obtained. Management of the case and review of the literature are presented.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

A phase II trial of combined chemotherapy and surgery in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

A poor prognosis for patients with Stage IIIA clinical N2 treated by surgery alone has led clinical researchers to find a new treatment modality to improve the curative potential of surgery. Many Phas II trials have been carried out with induction chemo- or chemo-radiotherapy prior to surgery. From June 1988 to July 1991, 46 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Stage IIIA clinical N2 entered a Phase II induction-chemotherapy trial. Patients received 2-3 cycles of high-dose cisplatin and etoposide. Forty-five were evaluable for response; the response rate was 82% (37/45: 3 CR, 34 PR). Toxicity was primarily hematologic. Surgical resection was performed in 35 patients; radical resection was possible in 28 patients (62%); three patients were incompletely resected and two patients were only explored. Three deaths were surgery-related. Median survival was 24.5 months with a 2-year survival of 53%. Cisplatin with etoposide is an active and safe induction chemotherapy regimen for NSCLC Stage IIIA N2 with a high response rate. The median survival seems to be prolonged and therefore, randomized trials are needed to compare this approach with other treatment modalities.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Superiority of three-drug combination chemotherapy versus cisplatin-etoposide in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial by the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

To evaluate the efficacy of a three-drug regimen vs. a two-drug CDDP based combination in the treatment of NSCLC, we conducted a three-arm randomized parallel trial comparing (a) CDDP (120 mg/m2 day 1) + etoposide (100 mg/m2 days 1-3) every 3 weeks (PE--arm A); (b) CDDP (120 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) + mitomycin (8 mg/m2 days 1, 29, 71) + vindesine (3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, 22 every 2 weeks) (MVP--arm B); and (c) CDDP (120 mg/m2 day 1) + mitomycin (6 mg/m2 day 1) + ifosfamide (3 g/m2 day 2) every 3 weeks (MIC--arm C). From May 1989 to April 1992, 393 consecutive previously untreated patients with NSCLC Stage IIIB and IV entered the trial; 373 were evaluable for survival and 360 for response. The response rate was significantly better for both the three-drug regimens compared with PE (Table 3). Logistic regression model showed a significantly better response in patients with a good P.S. and in Stage IIIB. Main toxicity consisted of myelosuppression: neutropenia Grade III-IV was recorded in 14% (arm A), 15% (arm B) and 21% (arm C). Thrombocytopenia Grade III-IV was worst in arm C: 10% vs. 5% (arm A) and 3% (arm B). Nephrotoxicity Grade III-IV was more common in arm C: 3.5%. Toxic deaths were 11 (3%: three in arm A, five in arm B, three in arm C). From our data, the three-drug containing regimens, MVP and MIC, appear more active than the two-drug combination PE in treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The experience of Italian Cooperative Groups.

The clinical experience of Italian Cooperative Groups in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer began in the early 1980's with several phase II trials on cisplatin-etoposide (PE) combination. PE was chosen and widely used also in neoadjuvant trials on the basis of several randomized studies showing a favourable safety-efficacy profile of this combination with respect to other chemotherapy regimens. Recently, in order to improve therapeutic results in NSCLC the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research compared PE versus mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) and mitomycin, vindesine and cisplatin, the three-drug regimens most widely used in clinical trials. This trial showed a significant difference in response rate and a survival benefit for MIC and MVP; therefore, we considered MIC or MVP as the reference treatment is advanced NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗