L D Case — Page 5 | PubMed Health

PubMedDate not supplied

Subxiphoid pericardial window for pericardial effusive disease.

A subxiphoid pericardial window made in 123 patients allowed drainage and diagnosis of pericardial effusions. In 40 patients with malignancy and effusions, median drainage was 450 ml; cytology was positive in 17 or 36 (47%), and pericardial biopsy showed cancer in 13 (43%) of 30 patients. In 11 patients with malignancy, both cytology of effusions and biopsy of the pericardium were negative. In 83 patients with benign effusions, median drainage was 400 ml. Effusions recurred in 14 of the 123 patients (11%); nine patients in the benign group and five in the malignant group. Five of these 14 underwent thoracotomy (3 to 542 days postoperatively); two underwent median sternotomy and one underwent pericardiocentesis. Two intraoperative deaths resulted from cardiac arrest. Mortality at 30 days was 25% (10/40 patients) in the malignant group and 11% (9/83 patients) in the benign group. No deaths resulted from recurrent effusions. The establishment of a subxiphoid pericardial window allows rapid and safe drainage of pericardial effusions with sampling for cytology and pericardial biopsy. It has minimal morbidity and few recurrent effusions.

Drainage↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Can positron emission tomography distinguish tumor recurrence from irradiation sequelae in patients treated for larynx cancer?

PURPOSE: Distinguishing persistent or recurrent tumor from post-radiation edema or soft-tissue/cartilage necrosis in patients treated for carcinoma of the larynx can be difficult. Because recurrent tumor is often submucosal, multiple deep biopsies may be necessary before a diagnosis can be established. Positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose was studied for its ability to aid in this problem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FDG PET scans were performed on 31 patients who were suspected of having persistent or recurrent tumor after radiation treatment for carcinoma of the larynx. Patients underwent thorough history and physical examinations, scans with computed tomography (23 patients), and pathological evaluation when indicated. PET scans were interpreted by each of the two radiologists, who were blinded to patient outcome and the other's report. RESULTS: The time between completion of radiation treatment and positron emission tomography examination ranged from 2 to 61 months with a median of 6 months. Fifteen patients had pathological evidence of tumor in the larynx, while 16 have remained without evidence of disease. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the positron emission tomography interpretations were 80% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the computed tomography scan interpretations were 58% and 100%, respectively. Of the 23 patients with computed tomography scans, eight patients acquired useful information from the positron emission tomography, three patients had incorrect positron emission tomography interpretations and correct computed tomography interpretations, and one patient had positive tumor despite a negative positron emission tomography and computed tomography. DISCUSSION: Positron emission tomography is useful in distinguishing benign from malignant changes in the larynx after radiation treatment. This noninvasive technique can supplement information provided by computed tomography scans. It is reasonable to delay biopsy, which could traumatize radiation-damaged tissues and precipitate necrosis, for those patients with negative positron emission tomography scans who have clinical signs and symptoms associated with recurrence.

Diagnosis, Differential↗