Drug information needs clarification.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Biomedical subjects
L D Grossman
Publications and source records attributed to L D Grossman.
Improved postprandial glycemic control with Humalog Mix75/25 after a standard test meal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
OBJECTIVE: This double-blind study was designed to compare the postprandial glucodynamic profile of Humalog Mix75/25, a new premixed insulin analogue containing 75% neutral protamine lispro and 25% insulin lispro with that of human insulin 70/30 (70% neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin and 30% regular human insulin) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BACKGROUND: Insulin lispro Mix75/25 (Mix75/25) is the first available insulin formulation in which both the rapid-acting and basal components are insulin analogues. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover study monitored patients' postprandial glucodynamic response to Mix75/25 and human insulin 70/30 (70/30) after a standard test meal. Eighty-four patients with type 2 diabetes participated in this study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment sequence groups. Patients received an identical test meal on 4 occasions, completing 2 test meals for each treatment. Equal doses of Mix75/25 or 70/30 were administered 5 minutes before each of the 2 test meals, with doses individualized for each patient. Blood samples were collected for 4 hours after the meal for measurement of plasma glucose. From these plasma glucose measurements, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose (2pp), 2-hour postprandial glucose excursion (2pp(ex)), maximum glucose excursion (Gex(max)), the area under the glucose concentration versus time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC4), and the area under the glucose excursion versus time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUCex4) were calculated. RESULTS: Because of significant differences in the baseline fasting plasma glucose levels between Mix75/25 and 70/30 (Mix75/25: 8.9+/-2.2 mmol/L [160.2+/-39.6 mg/dL]; 70/30: 8.6+/-1.9 mmol/L [154+/-34 mg/dL), analyses of the excursion parameters provide a truer comparison of the glucodynamic response between insulin formulations. Mix75/25 resulted in significantly lower values for 2pp(ex) (3.35+/-2.28 vs 4.13+/-2.26 mmol/L), Gex(max) (4.51+/-1.88 vs 5.19+/-1.98 mmol/L), and AUCex4 (8.01+/-7.02 vs 10.6+/-6.47 mmol x h/L) compared with 70/30. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, premeal injection of Mix75/25 resulted in better postprandial glycemic control than did premeal injection of 70/30 in the 4 hours after a standard meal. Mix75/25 is a valuable option for managing postprandial blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who require insulin.
Adult↗
The economic value of a new insulin preparation, Humalog Mix 25. Measured by a willingness-to-pay approach.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the economic value of a new insulin formulation consisting of rapid-acting insulin lispro and intermediate-acting neutral protamine lispro in a 25:75 ratio (Humalog Mix 25). DESIGN AND SETTING: A cost-benefit analysis using a consumer-based willingness-to-pay (WTP) approach was used. The study sample consisted of 80 Canadian taxpayers randomly selected from Ontario and Quebec. After background information on the differences between Humalog Mix 25 and human 30/70 insulin were presented, respondents were asked what their preferred product would be if they were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Respondents were then asked the maximum premium that they would pay per month in the form of a user's fee for the insulin of their choice. STUDY PERSPECTIVE: Canadian taxpayer perspective. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: The WTP survey instrument was simple to administer and easily understood by participants. Approximately 84% of the sample of taxpayers preferred to use Humalog Mix 25 rather than human 30/70 insulin and were willing to pay for it (p = 0.012). They were willing to pay a mean of $Can35.28 [95% confidence interval (CI): $Can27.50 to $Can43.07] per month for the benefits offered by Humalog Mix 25, which was at least 2-fold higher than the incremental monthly cost of the drug (1999 values). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study revealed that Canadians prefer to use Humalog Mix 25 instead of human 30/70 insulin, and they would be willing to pay for it. Compared with other drugs, this overall net gain suggests that Humalog Mix 25 represents good value for money and should be considered for reimbursement by government formularies and other third-party payers.
Adolescent↗
Humalog Mix25 offers better mealtime glycemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
To compare the postprandial glucodynamics of Humalog Mix25, (Humalog Mix75/25 in the US; Mix25), to human insulin 30/70 (Humulin 70/30 in the US; 30/70) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Ninety-three patients with type 1 diabetes and 84 patients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in two separate but identical protocols using a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover design. Patients consumed test meals 5 minutes after equal doses of Mix25 or 30/70. Plasma glucose was measured at baseline and 15 minute intervals for 4 hours after the meal. Two-hour postprandial glucose (2pp), 2-hour glucose excursion (2pp(ex) ), glucose versus time area under the curve 0 to 4 hours (AUC(0-4) ) and glucose excursion area under the curve 0 to 2 and 0 to 4 hours (AUCex(0-2), AUCex(0-4) ) were calculated. For the combined patient population, Mix25 resulted in significantly lower 2pp (12.45 +/- 3.59 vs. 13.47 +/- 3.62 mmol/L; p <0.001), AUC(0-4) (44.45 +/- 12.20 vs. 47.25 +/- 11.97 mmol x h/L; p <0.001), and glucose excursion parameters: 2pp(ex) (3.20 +/- 2.72 vs. 4.40 +/- 2.81 mmol/L; p <0.001), AUCex(0-2) (5.45 +/- 3.15 vs 6.60 +/- 3.13 mmol x h/L; p <0.001), and AUCex(0-4) (7.57 +/- 8.37 vs. 11.02 +/- 8.47 mmol x h/L; p <0.001) compared to 30/70. Further analysis of the treatment by type of diabetes indicated that Mix25 provided nearly identical glucose excursion responses in type 1 and type 2 diabetes up to 2 hours after the test meal, in contrast to 30/70. Pre-meal injection of Mix25 resulted in lower postprandial blood glucose levels compared to 30/70. The postprandial blood glucose response following Mix25 was similar in patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
Adult↗
The evidence for insulin lispro.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Blood Glucose↗
Updating the insulin lispro file.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Blood Glucose↗
Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma.
This article reports a case of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH), a rare fibrous tissue tumor with unique clinical characteristics. Formerly, this tumor was classified as angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma. First described in 1979, AFH was felt to be a variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). One dominant characteristic that differentiates this tumor from the remainder of MFH subtypes is that it most often presents in individuals younger than 20 years of age. The usual MFH occurs in the seventh decade of life. Because of its rarity, AFH has been difficult to classify and, during this current year, has been designated as a separate entity, rather than a subtype of MFH. Clinically, the tumor presents as a soft-tissue mass in the subcutis or deep dermal layers of the body, often presenting on the extremities or neck. Local recurrence has been reported, but mortality figures are very favorable and wide local removal is sufficient treatment.
Age Factors↗
Growth hormone suppression and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy: a preliminary feasibility study.
We used the long acting somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 in order to examine the feasibility and effect of medical suppression of growth hormone in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Six insulin-dependent diabetic subjects with nonproliferative retinopathy were studied. After eight weeks of SMS 201-995 administration, 24-hour integrated plasma growth hormone concentrations had declined by 47.0 +/- 9.3% of pretreatment values (p less than 0.01), and insulin requirements fell from 40.7 +/- 6.7 units per day to 32.2 +/- 6.9 units per day (p less than 0.01). Plasma levels of somatomedin-C were low before SMS 201-995 (0.5 +/- 0.1 U/ml) and remained unchanged at eight weeks (0.6 +/- 0.1 U/ml; p = ns). During SMS 201-995 administration, best corrected visual acuity improved in both right eyes (53.8 +/- 2.57 to 59.8 +/- 0.7 letters, p less than 0.05) and left eyes (54.8 +/- 2.8 to 61.7 +/- 1.23 letters, p less than 0.03). Fluorescein angiography and stereo fundus photography demonstrated concurrent improvement in retinopathy level in only two subjects. Following cessation of SMS 201-995 treatment, visual acuity returned to pretreatment levels in both right eyes (54.5 +/- 2.4 letters, p = ns compared to baseline) and left eyes (55.8 +/- 2.6 letters, p = ns compared to baseline). These results demonstrate that growth hormone was only partially suppressed by SMS 201-995 in insulin-dependent diabetic subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Adult↗
The effects of SMS 201-995 (sandostatin) on metabolic profiles in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
GH has been implicated in the pathophysiology of various acute and chronic complications of diabetes mellitus. As a consequence, there has been a great deal of interest in developing methods for suppressing GH secretion in diabetes. SMS 201-995 is a long-acting somatostatin analog which inhibits the secretion of numerous hormones, including GH. To determine the metabolic and hormonal responses to SMS 201-995 independent of endogenous insulin suppression, we studied six patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus while they received 150 micrograms SMS 201-995, sc, daily for an 8-week period. This treatment resulted in no change in 24-h glucose profiles, although the mean insulin dose decreased by 19%, while hemoglobin A1c decreased significantly (0.084 +/- 0.023 to 0.067 +/- 0.011, P = 0.04). The 24-h profiles of blood lactate, plasma free insulin, glucagon, FFA, blood glycerol, and beta-hydroxybutyrate were unchanged, whereas that of blood alanine increased significantly (7.8 +/- 0.4 to 10.6 +/- 0.9 mmol/L.h; P = 0.01). GH secretion declined in five of the six patients; the mean values before and during SMS 201-995 treatment were 102 +/- 23 and 68 +/- 12 micrograms/L.h, respectively (P = NS), for the six patients. [In the five patients in whom GH secretion declined, the mean values before and during SMS 201-995 treatment were 115 +/- 23 and 63 +/- 14 micrograms/L.h, respectively (P = 0.01).] These results suggest that SMS 201-995 may be administered to patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus without a deleterious effect on metabolic control.
Adult↗