Hindbrain morphology is compared in a variety of animals representing species that vomit and those that do not. Special attention is given to the nucleus of the tractus solitarius (NTS) and its synaptic connections with surrounding structures. The role of the area postrema is examined from the standpoints of containing the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) for vomiting, of its functional relationship to the blood-brain barrier, and of its significance as part of the circumventricular organ system. A survey is made of the manifold behavioral contributions of NTS to cardiovascular and respiratory regulation, appetite control, arousal, water balance, and digestive and neuroendocrine functions. An overview is presented of neurochemical distribution in the brain stem with respect to aminergic, cholinergic, and peptidergic substances. Finally, causes and prevention of vomiting are discussed in light of the above considerations.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Antiemetic activity of N-methyllevonantradol and nabilone in cisplatin-treated cats.

The comprehensive emetic response to xenobiotics can be quantified by monitoring the physiological forces which effectuate vomiting. A unique sequence of thoracic pressure pulses, generated by the somatic muscles of ventilation, can be measured by means of a central venous catheter. This unambiguous emetic endpoint is used to record emetic latency, repetitions and duration of action, all on an established time base and dependent of stomach content. Deslanoside (160 micrograms/kg) produced emesis in 15 cats beginning in 4.4 +/- 1.9 min (mean +/- S.D.). Subsequent emetic episodes were related in time in a log-linear but biphasic manner. Cisplatin (7.5 mg/kg) had an emetic latency of 71 +/- 18 mn in 7 cats. Additional events also had a long-linear temporal relationship for up to 400 min. This quantified emetic profile of cisplatin served as a measure for assessing antiemetic activity of N-metyllevonantradol (Pfizer), nabilone (Lilly) and prochlorperazine. The cannabinoids all evinced dose dependent antiemetic activity in terms of either complete protection, or increased latency to the first emetic episode and reduced number of episodes in those animals not completely protected. By comparison prochlorperazine afforded only minimal protection.

Animals↗