Biomedical subjects

L E Rhodes

Publications and source records attributed to L E Rhodes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Evidence-based practice of photopheresis 1987-2001: a report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group and the U.K. Skin Lymphoma Group.

Photopheresis or extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is a novel immunomodulatory therapy which involves separation of the patient's leucocyte-rich plasma, followed by ex vivo administration of a photosensitizer and ultraviolet A radiation, before reinfusion. ECP has been used successfully for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL: Sézary syndrome), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and cardiac transplant rejection. ECP has a dose-sparing effect on concurrent immunosuppressive therapy. The procedure induces apoptosis of the irradiated lymphocytes, but the exact mechanism by which ECP exerts its therapeutic effect in these different conditions is uncertain. The treatment has very few adverse effects and in particular is not associated with an increased incidence of opportunistic infections. The evidence for the efficacy of ECP has been appraised by a combined British Photodermatology Group and U.K. Skin Lymphoma Group workshop on the basis of evidence published up to the end of 2001 and on the consensus of best practice. There is fair evidence for the use of ECP in erythrodermic CTCL and steroid-refractory GVHD, but randomized controlled studies are needed. There is good evidence supporting the use of ECP in preventing cardiac rejection following transplantation. Randomized controlled trials have also shown a therapeutic benefit in type 1 diabetes mellitus, but the inconvenience associated with the procedure outweighed the clinical benefit. There is fair evidence not to use ECP for the treatment of systemic sclerosis and multiple sclerosis, and good evidence not to use ECP for other forms of CTCL.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

PubMed2006

Development and evaluation of an e-learning package for teaching skin examination. Action research.

BACKGROUND: Dermatology is one of many specialities competing for space in the undergraduate curriculum, and recent review reveals that in some medical schools only a minority of students receives direct teaching from dermatologists. Enlargement of medical schools and dispersion of students over multiple sites further increase the strain on teaching resources. OBJECTIVES: To develop and obtain 'proof of concept' for a technology to teach skin examination, using an approach grounded in modern theories of learning. METHODS: The requirements for an e-learning technology were identified through literature review and qualitative analysis of stakeholders' requirements with respondent and expert validation. A method of teaching skin examination was developed by applying Anderson's theory of skills acquisition. It was prototyped first on paper, then electronically, and its usability as an instructional tool was evaluated. RESULTS: The project delivered, firstly, a specification for skin examination derived from published evidence, textbook content, and staff and student consensus; and secondly, a very useable technology to help students learn skin examination (http://www.skillsbase.man.ac.uk). A validation task was completed in 20 min without significant usability problems, and evaluators found it simple, intuitive, interactive and enjoyable to use. Students saw it as an adjunct that would help them build confidence and revise for examinations. Nonstakeholder teachers expressed concern about the apparent simplicity of its contents and felt that it should only be used in association with traditional teaching methods. CONCLUSIONS: Students, educationalists and teachers were able to codesign a useable skin examination package, which merits evaluation of efficacy. In view of the logistic difficulties of teaching dermatology to the growing student population, the technology may be a useful adjunct to traditional teaching methods. Our approach may inform further developments in educational technology in dermatology.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗

PubMed2006

Photopatch testing of 1155 patients: results of the U.K. multicentre photopatch study group.

BACKGROUND: Photoallergic contact dermatitis can be difficult to diagnose if not appropriately investigated. Currently, the most common U.K. photoallergens appear to be sunscreen chemicals. The investigation of choice is photopatch testing (PPT), which is probably underused. In part, this is due to differences in methodology and results interpretation. OBJECTIVES: To conduct PPT using a group of sunscreen chemicals, defined indications and a standardized methodology including interpretation and relevance of reactions in patients attending for investigation at 17 centres across the U.K., Ireland and the Netherlands. METHODS: Patients (n = 1155) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were investigated with PPT using sunscreen chemicals in addition to suspected topical products. Readings were taken at 24, 48 and 72 h following standardized ultraviolet A irradiation (5 J cm(-2)). The clinical relevance of any reaction was recorded. RESULTS: Of the 1155, 130 had allergic reactions (11.3%). Of these, 51 had photoallergy (PA) (4.4%), 64 had contact allergy (CA) (5.5%), and 15 patients had combined PA and CA (1.3%). Multiple PA was seen in some. The most common photoallergen was benzophenone-3 (27 reactions; 21%). Most reactions (60%) were clinically relevant. The most common indication for testing in patients found to have PA was a history of reacting to a sunscreen (41%). The other 59% had an exposed-site dermatitis/skin problem or a photodermatosis. Some centres (n = 8) performed readings after the standard 48-h reading, and an extra 32 PA and 22 CA reactions were detected, which were not evident at 48 h. A new photoallergen (octyl triazone) was detected in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sunscreen PA and CA are probably equally uncommon. Most reactions, of both reaction types, were relevant clinically. A large proportion of patients (59%) found to have PA was unaware of reacting to a sunscreen chemical, suggesting that PA should be considered as an explanation in any exposed-site dermatitis. Although this study focused on reactions at 48 h postirradiation, readings performed up to 96 h, while inconvenient, add value by detecting additional relevant responses. A previously unknown photoallergen was found, highlighting the need for awareness of novel photoallergens in the marketplace. A standardized PPT method not only encourages more use of this investigation, but also facilitates comparison of results between centres and so will improve our understanding of PA.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Photosensitive Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome is not caused by a single gene mutation: analysis of the gene encoding 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase in five U.K. families.

BACKGROUND: Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) is an autosomal recessive malformation syndrome characterized by a disorder in cholesterol metabolism. SLOS is caused by mutations in the DHCR7 gene which encodes 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase, an enzyme that catalyses the final step in cholesterol biosynthesis. We have previously established the clinical and photobiological features of the photosensitivity that is frequently a feature of SLOS. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we have performed mutational analysis of the DHCR7 gene in individuals from five families with SLOS. In each family, one member was affected by severe photosensitivity as a manifestation of SLOS. METHODS: Fifteen samples (including family controls) were screened using polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct automated sequencing. RESULTS: Six different DHCR7 mutations were identified of which five were single point mutations that caused missense amino acid substitutions (P51H, T93M, L99P, E448K and R450L). The other was a splice site mutation (G-->C in splice acceptor site) affecting the intron 8-exon 9 splice junction (IVS8-1 G-->C). This splice site mutation and four of the five missense mutations have been previously published as causal in SLOS but the P51H is a novel mutation which has not previously been reported. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in which DHCR7 gene mutational analysis has been performed on SLOS subjects with severe photosensitivity and indicates that no single mutation is responsible for the photosensitivity which characterizes this disorder.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Solar angioedema: an uncommonly recognized condition?

Solar urticaria is a well defined although uncommon photosensitivity disorder, and is said to be the underlying cause of chronic urticaria in approximately 0.5% cases. In contrast, solar angioedema is seldom reported. We describe two patients with postulated solar angioedema, associated with clinical and/or phototest features of solar urticaria. Recognition of solar provocation of angioedema has important consequences for patient management.

Angioedema↗

PubMed2005

Photoaggravated pityriasis rubra pilaris.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare papulosquamous condition with an estimated incidence of one in 35,000 to one in 50,000. Psoralen and ultraviolet A (UVA) therapy has been used in its treatment but some patients are reported to be clinically photosensitive. We describe the photoinvestigation of a patient with PRP in whom sensitivity to broadband UVA was demonstrated.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

An update and guidance on narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy: a British Photodermatology Group Workshop Report.

Summary These guidelines for use of narrowband (TL-01) ultraviolet B have been prepared for dermatologists by the British Photodermatology Group on behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists. They present evidence-based guidance for treatment of patients with a variety of dermatoses and photodermatoses, with identification of the strength of evidence available at the time of preparation of the guidelines, and a brief overview of background photobiology.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

PubMed2004

Influence of oral antioxidants on ultraviolet radiation-induced skin damage in humans.

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) causes a range of acute and chronic adverse cutaneous effects, in addition to some beneficial effects. In present times, the skin is generally exposed to higher levels of UVR, such that inherent defence mechanisms become overwhelmed. Complications, notably skin malignancies, show a serious rise in incidence. Since many effects of UVR are mediated through generation of reactive oxygen species, antioxidant supplementation provides a strategy to combat their excess generation, and hence reduce the clinical consequences. Human supplementation studies examining the potential of a range of oral agents to protect against UVR-induced skin effects show mixed results; further studies should examine whether certain subgroups of the population may show augmented benefit.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

A questionnaire survey of attitudes to and usage of sunscreens in northwest England.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Sunscreens are employed with the aim of reducing the deleterious effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR), but little is known about their use in the UK. METHODS: This questionnaire survey assessed attitudes to and usage of sunscreens in northwest England in 2000. Subjects (186 females and 102 males) were recruited from the waiting rooms of four general practices, with a high response rate of 97%. RESULTS: Females were more frequent users of sunscreens than males, but only 35% females and 8% males reported their regular use. Twenty-two per cent of the study population did not use sunscreens at all, whereas 66% of subjects bought a sunscreen product once a year or less. Thirty-four per cent subjects reported experiencing sunburn in the last 2 years. Interestingly, more (60%) sunburns were found to occur at home in the UK than on holidays abroad, and these frequently occurred during outdoor activities other than deliberate sunbathing. CONCLUSION: There remains much scope for sunscreen education in the British public.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

The effect of an iron chelating agent on protoporphyrin IX levels and phototoxicity in topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy.

BACKGROUND: In 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA)-photodynamic therapy (PDT), the prodrug ALA is endogenously converted to the active sensitizer protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), while further conversion of PpIX to haem requires iron. OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential of the iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO) to enhance PpIX levels and phototoxicity in ALA-PDT. METHODS: A series of six doses of 2% ALA solution was iontophoresed into the healthy skin of each ventral forearm of 10 volunteers. One arm was pretreated with 20% DFO in aqueous cream, while the control arm received aqueous cream alone, for 16 h. At 5 h following iontophoresis, skin-surface PpIX fluorescence was measured, following which the forearms were simultaneously irradiated with 100 J cm-2 broadband red light. The phototoxic reaction was assessed at 24 h postirradiation as the minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) and with quantification of erythema. Next, eight patients with two superficial basal cell carcinomas or two plaques of Bowen's disease of similar appearance received 20% ALA topically to one lesion and 20% ALA with 20% DFO to the other, for 3 h. Skin-surface PpIX fluorescence was measured at 5 h, following which lesions were irradiated with 100 J cm-2 broadband red light. RESULTS: In healthy skin, PpIX fluorescence increased with increasing ALA dose at DFO-treated and untreated sites (P < 0.0005); PpIX fluorescence peak values were consistently higher in DFO-treated compared with control sites (P < 0.02). Erythema also correlated with ALA dose (P < 0.0005), but a significant difference between active and control sites occurred only at low ALA dose (P < 0.05). The median MPD appeared lower at the DFO-treated sites, at 6 mC vs. 12 mC (P = 0.06). In contrast, in lesional skin there was no consistent difference in PpIX fluorescence levels between those treated with and without DFO. CONCLUSIONS: While iron chelation augmented ALA-PDT phototoxicity in normal skin, this occurred only at low ALA dose. Addition of DFO does not appear to confer additional benefit in ALA-PDT of nonmelanoma skin cancers.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed2003

Photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy of cutaneous disease.

Photodynamic therapy is a rapidly developing treatment modality in dermatology. A sensitizer drug is activated by light in the presence of oxygen. This results in the release of reactive oxygen species that damage the target tissue. The ideal features of a photosensitizer are that it should be highly selective for lesional tissue, activated by light of a sufficiently long wavelength for tissue penetration, and have a high photodynamic yield (i.e. production of singlet oxygen). A short time interval between administration and its maximal accumulation in tumour tissue, followed by rapid tissue clearance, are also desirable. First-generation sensitizers were complex chemical mixtures, needing parenteral administration and causing troublesome and prolonged photosensitivity. A range of second-generation sensitizers of different chemical families show several advantages including purity, longer activation wavelength and less prolonged photosensitivity, but effective topical formulations have not been developed. Currently, the most convenient and widely practised form of PDT for cutaneous disorders is the topical application of the pro-drug delta-aminolevulinic acid or its methylated ester, which are activated by light following metabolism to the endogenous sensitizer protoporphyrin IX.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

Topical methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy in patients with basal cell carcinoma prone to complications and poor cosmetic outcome with conventional treatment.

BACKGROUND: Conventional treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) causes morbidity and/or disfigurement in some patients because of the location (e.g. mid-face) and size of the lesion. OBJECTIVES: Following reports that such difficult-to-treat BCC lesions have been treated successfully with topical methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) photodynamic therapy (PDT), a multicentre study was performed to determine the response of such BCC to MAL-PDT. METHODS: An open, uncontrolled, prospective, multicentre study was conducted comprising patients with superficial and/or nodular BCC who were at risk of complications, poor cosmetic outcome, disfigurement and/or recurrence using conventional therapy. Patients were given one or two cycles within 3 months of topical MAL-PDT, each consisting of two treatments 1 week apart. Tumour response was assessed clinically at 3 months after the last PDT, with histological confirmation of all lesions in clinical remission. The cosmetic outcome was rated. Patients with a BCC in remission will be followed up for 5 years for recurrence, of which the 24-month follow-up is reported here. Ninety-four patients with 123 lesions were enrolled and treated with MAL-PDT at nine European primary care and referral university hospitals. An independent blinded study review board (SRB) retrospectively excluded nine patients and a total of 15 lesions from the efficacy analysis, for not having a difficult-to-treat BCC according to the protocol. RESULTS: The lesion remission rate at 3 months was 92% (45 of 49) for superficial BCC, 87% (45 of 52) for nodular BCC, and 57% (four of seven) for mixed BCC, as assessed by clinical examination, and 85% (40 of 47), 75% (38 of 51), and 43% (three of seven), respectively, as assessed by histological examination and verified by the SRB. At 24 months after treatment, the overall lesion recurrence rate was 18% (12 of 66). The cosmetic outcome was graded as excellent or good by the investigators in 76% of the cases after 3 months follow-up, rising to 85% at 12 months follow-up, and 94% at 24 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Topical MAL-PDT is effective in treating BCC at risk of complications and poor cosmetic outcome using conventional therapy. MAL-PDT preserves the skin and shows favourable cosmetic results.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2002

UVR-induced oxidative stress in human skin in vivo: effects of oral vitamin C supplementation.

Previous studies of cultured skin cells and murine skin in vivo have indicated that UVR-induced damage involves the generation of reactive oxygen species and depletion of endogenous antioxidant systems. In order to explore the relevance of this to UVR-induced damage to human skin, we have undertaken a detailed examination of the time-course of changes in markers of oxidative stress in human skin following exposure to physiological amounts of UVR in vivo. In addition, we have examined the skin bioavailability of a common nutritional antioxidant, vitamin C, and have assessed the effects of supplementation on markers of oxidative stress. Our hypothesis was that acute exposure of human skin to UVR in vivo would lead to oxidation of cellular biomolecules that could be prevented by prior vitamin C treatment. A UVR-challenge of 120 mJ/cm2 of broadband UVB (peak 310 nm, range 270-400 nm) was applied to buttock skin of 8 healthy volunteers. This caused a rapid and significant rise in activity of skin catalase at 1 h and an increase in the oxidized/total glutathione ratio at 6 h post-UVR. AP-1 DNA binding also peaked at 1-6 h post-UVR, then declined rapidly to baseline levels. No significant changes were seen in skin malonaldehyde content. Oral vitamin C supplements (500 mg/day) were taken by 12 volunteers for 8 weeks resulting in significant rises in plasma and skin vitamin C content. Supplementation had no effect on the UVR-induced erythemal response. The skin malonaldehyde content was reduced by vitamin C supplementation, but surprisingly, reductions in the skin content of total glutathione and protein thiols were also seen. We speculate that this apparently paradoxical effect could be due to regulation of total reductant capacity by skin cells, such that vitamin C may have been replacing other reductants in these cells. No evidence was obtained for an effect of the supplementary vitamin C on the mild oxidative stress seen in human skin following UVR exposure.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group.

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective in the treatment of certain non-melanoma skin cancers and is under evaluation in other dermatoses. Its development has been enhanced by a low rate of adverse events and good cosmesis. 5-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) is the main agent used, converted within cells into the photosensitizer protoporphyrin IX, with surface illumination then triggering the photodynamic reaction. Despite the relative simplicity of the technique, accurate dosimetry in PDT is complicated by multiple variables in drug formulation, delivery and duration of application, in addition to light-specific parameters. Several non-coherent and coherent light sources are effective in PDT. Optimal disease-specific irradiance, wavelength and total dose characteristics have yet to be established, and are compounded by difficulties comparing light sources. The carcinogenic risk of ALA-PDT appears to be low. Current evidence indicates topical PDT to be effective in actinic keratoses on the face and scalp, Bowen's disease and superficial basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). PDT may prove advantageous where size, site or number of lesions limits the efficacy and/or acceptability of conventional therapies. Topical ALA-PDT alone is a relatively poor option for both nodular BCCs and squamous cell carcinomas. Experience of the modality in other skin diseases remains limited; areas where there is potential benefit include viral warts, acne, psoriasis and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. A recent British Photodermatology Group workshop considered published evidence on topical PDT in order to establish guidelines to promote the efficacy and safety of this increasingly practised treatment modality.

Aminolevulinic Acid↗

PubMed2002

Guidelines for dosimetry and calibration in ultraviolet radiation therapy: a report of a British Photodermatology Group workshop.

This report examines the dosimetry of ultraviolet (UV) radiation applied to dermatological treatments, and considers the definition of the radiation quantities and their measurement. Guidelines are offered for preferred measurement techniques and standard methods of dosimetry. The recommendations have been graded according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification of strength of recommendation and quality of evidence (summarized in Appendix 5).

Humans↗

PubMed2002

Topical photodynamic therapy in disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been reported to be useful in treating certain nonmelanoma skin cancers and a variety of benign skin conditions. We examined whether PDT might be effective in the treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. Three patients with classical disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis had a small test area treated with topical aminolaevulinic acid PDT. Following the first treatment, the disorder cleared in the test area in one patient, but failed to respond in the other two patients. After subsequent treatment, the initial benefit seen in the first patient was not sustained, and no response was seen in the second patient, while the third patient was not retreated due to hyperpigmentation induced by the procedure. The results obtained in this small case series suggest that topical PDT is not a promising treatment for disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed2002

Effects of micronutrient supplements on u.v.-induced skin damage.

Development of an orally-administered systemic agent that could reduce the effects of u.v. exposure on skin could potentially have a major effect on the incidence of skin cancers and photo-ageing. A number of micronutrients have been suggested to have metabolic properties that could induce this protection, and our data indicate that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are particularly effective in this role. The mechanisms of action of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids appear to depend on their anti-inflammatory properties, acting to reduce the u.v.-induced release of cytokines and other mediators from a variety of skin cell types.

Aging↗

PubMed2001

Ultraviolet-B-induced erythema is mediated by nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 in combination.

Ultraviolet-B-induced erythema (one, two, or four times the minimal erythema dose) was reduced but not abolished by application of 1% indomethacin gel immediately after irradiation of human skin. Continuous synthesis of prostaglandins is reflected by similar levels of indomethacin-mediated inhibition of erythema at any time within 48 h after irradiation. Repeated applications of indomethacin did not increase the inhibition. Twenty-four hours after irradiation with four minimal erythema doses, mean prostaglandin E2 levels in suction blisters were 27.2 ng per ml (SEM 11) compared with 8.6 ng per ml in unirradiated skin (n = 25; p < 0.01). Prosta glandin E2 levels in dermal tissues, sampled by microdialysis (depth 0.6 +/- 0.1 mm), were 310 pg per ml (SEM 123) and 237 pg per ml (SEM 88) in irradiated and unirradiated skin, respectively (n = 7, n.s.). Nitric oxide also made a significant contribution to ultraviolet-B-induced erythema. Ultraviolet erythema was inhibited by L-NAME in a dose-related fashion with 2 mM L-NAME causing total abolition of the response. L-NAME was effective at all time points up to 48 h suggesting that NO was produced continuously. NO was undetectable in suction blister fluid but in dermal microdialysate NO was present at 44.3 ng per ml (SEM 6.2) following ultraviolet B compared with 26.0 ng per ml (SEM 8.0) in unirradiated skin (p < 0.05), approximately 1000 times the molar concentration of prostaglandin E2. These findings confirm prostaglandin E2 and NO to be mediators of ultraviolet-induced erythema. They also show that there is prolonged synthesis of both mediators within the erythemal response and that synthesis of NO is induced by lower doses of ultraviolet B compared with that of prostaglandin E2.

Blister↗