Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Feuvret.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
About 30% of patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty show evidence of restenosis, which appears to be independent of the angioplasty method used. The restenosis is due of two factors, firstly migration of smooth vascular muscle cells of the vascular media to the intima and multiplication which lead to the formation of a neo-intima. Irradiation limits the proliferation by acting of the cells in the mitotic stage. The vascular target volume is not very thick and is difficult to define it, that why brachytherapy seems to be the best procedure to prevent restenosis. However, the development of this treatment present many difficulties. Different irradiation techniques have been studied. Such techniques include catheter containing radioactive sealed source, radioactive stent, or balloon containing radioactive liquid inside. Each of these methods have their own advantages, inconveniences, problems and risks. Radioisotope may be either beta or gamma emitters. Gamma emitter presents problems for radioprotection but the satisfactory dose distribution may be difficult to obtain using beta emitter. Choice of dose, dose rate and delay between the end of angioplasty and the beginning of brachytherapy is subject to some discuss. Animal experiments using radioisotope have shown reduction in cell proliferation. Human trials showed feasibility, safety of the method and real impact on restenosis prevention. However, long-term efficacy has not been proved because the follow-up of the patients is too short. A randomized trial of 192Ir brachytherapy for prevention of restenosis has recently shown the efficacy in short and median term. However, long term efficiency and secondary effects have not yet been established as the follow up time of this study is still too short. That is why, collaboration between cardiologists and radiotherapists and physicists is indispensable to enable the development of an optimal technique.
Local control of brain metastases is better with first treatment by stereotactic radiosurgery than with radiosurgery for recurrence. We reported a retrospective analysis of the influence of clinical and technical factors on local control and survival after radiosurgery realised in first intention. From January 1994 to December 1997, 26 patients presenting with 43 metastases underwent radiosurgery. The median age was 61 years and the median Karnofsky index 70. Primary sites included: lung (12 patients), kidney (7 patients), breast (2 patients), colon (1 patient), melanoma (2 patients), osteosarcoma (1 patient), it was unknown for one patient. Seven patients had extracranial metastases. Twenty-one sessions of radiosurgery have been realized for one metastase, and 9 for two, three or four lesions. The median diameter was 21 mm and the median volume 1.8 cm3. The median peripheral dose to the lesion was 14 Gy, and the median dose at the isocenter 20 Gy. Forty-two metastases were evaluable for response analysis. The overall local control rate was 90.5% and the 1-year, 2- and 3-year actuarial rates were 85% and 75%. In univariate analysis, theorical radioresistance was significantly associated with better local control (100% versus 77%, p < 0.05). All patients were evaluable for survival. The median survival rate was 15 months. Four patients had a symptomatic oedema (RTOG grade II). Two lesions have required a surgical excision. In conclusion, low dose radiosurgery (14 Gy delivered at the periphery of metastasis) can be proposed in first intention for brain metastases, in particularly for theorical radioresistant lesions.