The validity of seven neoclassical facial canons was tested in 100 young, adult, Afro-American (A-A) males and females, and the results were compared with 103 North American Caucasians, producing the first reliable information about the differences of facial proportions in the two populations. Although the canons should not be regarded as strict directives in reconstructive and esthetic surgery, the data obtained from the study offered the first information about the facial proportion qualities of Afro-Americans in relation to the white population. In the absence of a detailed facial proportion study in A-As, the findings in canons can assist in planning the surgery. Comparison of the two populations revealed that the three sections of the facial profile were not equal in either population. In an A-A sample it showed the prevalence of the long lower face height also in relation to the height of the forehead. In horizontal canons of the orbital regions, the similarity between the two populations was demonstrated by the great frequency of intercanthal spaces to be wider than the length of the palpebral fissures [1]. The facial canons, including the nose width, relatively wider [2] in A-A than in white subjects, prompted the difference between A-A and Caucasians in frequency and degree in the dominant canon variations. The greater inclination of the nasal bridge than that of the medial longitudinal axis of the ear was a very frequent canon variation in both populations. Generally, the frequency of valid canons was greatly surpassed by their variations.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations.

To better our ability to analyze the facial disproportions of patients of Chinese ancestry, we compared the validity of four neoclassical canons of facial proportion in Chinese and North American Caucasians populations. We tested the frequency of four horizontal facial canons and their eight variations in 206 healthy adults (105 males and 101 females, 18-25 years old) belonging to the predominant ethnic group (Han: 400 million) of the Chinese population, and compared them to those of 103 healthy young North American Caucasian adults. The nose width corresponded to one-quarter of the face width (the nasofacial canon) significantly more frequently in Chinese participants (51.5%) than in Caucasian adults (36.9%). The nose was narrower than one-quarter of the face width in 38.8% of North American Caucasians and in 21.8% of Chinese; this difference was also statistically significant. In defiance of the naso-oral canon, the mouths of Chinese people were significantly more often narrower than 1.5 times the nose width (71.8%), while in North American Caucasian ethnics the mouth was significantly more frequently wider (60.2%).

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Orbital protrusion index in Treacher-Collins syndrome: a tool for determining the degree of soft-tissue damage.

The relationship of measurements of the intercanthal width (en-en), the biocular width (ex-ex) and both eye fissures (ex-en), constituting the orbital protrusion index ex-ex x 100 (en-en) + (en-ex, r) + (en-ex, l) was used to analyze preoperative morphological developments in the orbits of 23 patients with Treacher Collins syndrome. The index permitted distinction between mildly and severely defective orbits, based on the degree of defective measurements and variations in relative sagittal positions. Optimal index values (mean, 94.0) were seen in 11 subjects with a slightly different sagittal level between the inner and outer commissures of the eye fissures, which created slightly protruding but still normal soft-tissue relief. The eye fissures in seven patients were moderately reduced in length. Orbits with higher indices (mean 98.1) (12 subjects) showed less differences in level between the two commissures of the eye fissures, producing a flattening in the surface relief. Eye fissure length was markedly subnormal in all patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied