PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L G Sambo

Publications and source records attributed to L G Sambo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Health sector reform in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of country experiences.

Health sector reform is 'a sustained process of fundamental changes in national health policy, institutional arrangements, etc. guided by government and designed to improve the functioning and performance of the health sector and, ultimately, the health status of the population'. All the forty six countries in the African Region of the World Health Organisation have embarked on one form of health sector reform or the other. The contexts and contents of their health reform programmes have varied from one country to another. Health reforms in the region have been influenced largely by the poor performance of the health systems, particularly with regard to the quality of health services. Most countries have taken due congnizance of the deficiencies on their health systems in the design of their health reform programmes and they have made some progress in the implementation of such programmes. Indeed, some countries have adopted sector-wide approaches (SWAps) in developing and implementing their health reform programmes. Since countries are at various stages of implementing their health reform programmes, there is a lot of potential for countries to learn from one another. This paper is a synthesis of the experiences of the countries of the Region in the development and implementation of their health sector reform programmes. It also highlights the future perspectives in this important area.

Africa South of the Sahara↗

Technical efficiency of public clinics in Kwazulu-Natal Province of South Africa.

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) much of the attention of policy makers, health care managers, health systems researchers and donors is focussed almost solely on mobilising additional resources and not on efficiency in their use. OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate the technical inefficiencies among 155 primary health care clinics in Kwazulu-Natal Province of South Africa; and to draw policy implications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional provincial health clinic survey. SELLING: Kwazulu-Natal Provincial Department of Health Clinics survey, 1996. SUBJECTS: The analysis is based on 155 public clinics. INTERVENTIONS: Non-intervention Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technical and scale efficiency scores. RESULTS: Forty seven (30%) were found to be technically efficient. Among the 108 (70%) technically inefficient facilities, 16% had an efficiency score of 50% or less. The presence of inefficiencies indicates that a clinic has excess inputs or insufficient outputs compared to those clinics on the efficiency frontier. To achieve technical efficiency, Kwazulu-Natal clinics would, in total have to decrease inputs by 417 nurses and 457 general staff. Alternatively, outputs would have to be increased by 115,534 antenatal visits, 1,010 births (deliveries), 179,075 child care visits, 5,702 dental visits, 121,658 family planning visits, 36,032 psychiatric visits, 56,068 sexually transmitted disease visits and 34,270 tuberculosis visits. CONCLUSION: There is need for more detailed studies in a number of the relativdy efficient clinics to determine why they are efficient with a view of documenting attributes of 'best practise' that other clinics can emulate. The potential benefit of replicating this kind of study in other provinces, and indeed, other SSA countries cannot be overemphasised.

Community Health Centers↗

How to develop an operational plan for health.

BACKGROUND: About 88%, 8%, 36% and 28% of the ministries of health in African countries do not have long-term health plans (LTHPs), health policies (HPs), strategic plans (SPs), and operational plans (OPs), respectively. Eight per cent, 38% and 54% of the countries with OPs rated their formulation as 'excellent', 'satisfactory' and 'needs improvement', respectively. OBJECTIVE(S): To provide a rationale for an OP; to describe its contents; and to explain the process of developing it. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Operational plans in the WHO African Region. INTERVENTIONS: Non-intervention descriptive study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operational plan (OP) for health. RESULTS: An OP framework and process that could be adapted by countries is proposed. CONCLUSION: An adequately formulated OP will contain objectives, targets, expected results, activities, required resources, and a monitoring and evaluation plan (consisting of responsibilities, monitoring indicators, evaluation indicators, data sources - for verifying indicators, and periodicity). In the next two decades, we envision that all the UN agencies and other health partners working in Africa will cooperate with individual countries to develop (or strengthen) LTHPs, HPs, SPs, and OPs of the Ministries of Health (national, provincial and district level).

Africa↗

Evaluation of health-related programmes in Africa: a vision for 2020.

BACKGROUND: Whereas systematic evaluation practice is over five decades old in economically developed continents (DCs), that culture has not yet taken root in Africa. OBJECTIVE(S): To provide an overview of the current situation of health-related evaluation in the African Region; to envision an appropriate evaluation framework for the next two decades; and to provide overviews of what formative (FE) and summative (SE) evaluations are and how they could be conducted. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Health policies and plans evaluation in the WHO African Region. SUBJECTS OR PARTICIPANTS: WHO Country Representatives for 25 African Countries. INTERVENTIONS: Non-intervention descriptive study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability and quality of long-term health plan (LTHP), health policy (HP), strategic plan (SP), operational plan (OP), and an evaluation culture. RESULTS: The study found that: 88%, 8%, 36%, 28% and 48% of the countries in the Region do not have LTHP, HP, SP, OP and evaluation culture. A conceptual evaluation framework, tools for formative and summative evaluations are proposed. CONCLUSION: It is envisioned that all partners for health development in Africa will cooperate with individual countries to develop (or strengthen) LTHPs, HPs, SPs, and Ministries of Health OPs (national, provincial and district level); and to make complementary investments in building technical and administrative capacity for evaluating implementation of District Operational Plans (DOPs).

Africa↗