PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Gaspa

Publications and source records attributed to L Gaspa.

45 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Comparative effects of L-methionine, S-adenosyl-L-methionine and 5'-methylthioadenosine on the growth of preneoplastic lesions and DNA methylation in rat liver during the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis.

Male Wistar rats, initiated with diethylnitrosamine (DENA), were subjected to a selection treatment, according to the "resistant hepatocyte" model, followed or not followed by phenobarbital (PB). Rats received, for 3 weeks after selection, 4 i.m. doses (96 mmol/kg) of L-methionine, S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM), or 5'-methylthioadenosine (MTA), a SAM catabolite formed during polyamine synthesis or by spontaneous splitting of SAM at physiologic temperature and pH. They were then killed. In some rats, SAM and MTA treatments were started 20 weeks after initiation. The animals were killed 3 weeks later and persistent (neoplastic) nodules (PN) were collected. Some rat groups received 1/2 and 1/4 of the above SAM and MTA doses, or 1/8 of the above MTA dose. SAM and MTA, but not methionine, caused a dose-dependent decrease in number and surface area of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT)-positive foci, and in labeling index (LI) of focal cells, coupled with remodeling. SAM and MTA liver contents, SAM/S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) ratio and overall methylation of liver DNA were low during the development of GGT-positive foci. SAM, but not methionine, caused a dose-dependent recovery of SAM content and DNA methylation, and a partial reconstitution of liver MTA pool. Exogenous MTA only induced the reconstitution of MTA pool, without affecting SAM level and DNA methylation. Recovery of SAM and MTA pool and DNA methylation was found in the rats subjected to SAM plus MTA, indicating the absence of inhibition of DNA methyltransferases in vivo by MTA. MTA also inhibited liver reparative growth in partially hepatectomized rats, without modifying SAM content and DNA methylation of regenerating liver (RL). A high activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) was found in the liver, during the development of preneoplastic foci, and in PN. This activity was inhibited by SAM and MTA treatments. Although MTA was more effective than SAM, the decrease in ODC activity was coupled with a larger fall in DNA synthesis in SAM-treated than in MTA-treated rats. Thus the antipromotion effect of SAM could not merely depend on its (spontaneous) transformation into MTA. Although MTA production may play a role in the SAM antipromotion effect, other mechanisms could be involved. A role of DNA methylation in the inhibition of growth by SAM is suggested. MTA is a potential chemopreventive agent for liver carcinogenesis.

Adenosine↗

Effect of S-adenosyl-L-methionine on the development of preneoplastic foci and the activity of some carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes in the liver, during experimental hepatocarcinogenesis.

gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT)-positive foci and glutathione-S-transferase, placental (GST-P)-positive lesions occupied 36% and 54% of liver parenchyma, respectively, in Wistar rats 8 weeks after initiation with diethylnitrosamine, followed by selection. The administration of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM, 384 mumol/kg/day) caused 77% and 42% falls in the percentage of GGT-positive and GST-P-positive lesions, respectively. There also occurred a 46% decrease in labeling index of GGT-positive foci, in SAM-treated rats. These changes were associated with decrease in liver pyruvate kinase (PK), lactate dehydrogenase and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. SAM did not affect these enzymatic activities in normal and uninitiated controls, but it caused a consistent increase in initiated rats. Enolase, fructose-biphosphatase and malic enzyme (ME) activities increased in the liver of initiated rats. SAM did not modify significantly these enzymatic activities, either in control or in initiated rats. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) was 113% higher in the liver of initiated rats than in uninitiated controls. SAM treatment did not significantly affect this enzymatic activity in uninitiated rats, but caused a great decrease in initiated ones. As expected, there occurred a marked rise in GGT activity in the liver of initiated rats, with respect to controls. SAM caused an increase in GGT activity in normal and uninitiated controls, but it caused a 77% fall in GGT activity in initiated rats, coupled with a 380% rise in remodeling of GGT-positive lesions. Histochemical determination of G6PDH and ME activities showed that in the absence of SAM many preneoplastic lesions expressed higher G6PDH and ME activities than surrounding liver. SAM did not affect ME-positive lesions, while it caused a decrease in the number of G6PDH-positive lesions. Immunohistochemical determination of PK activity, isoenzyme L, showed a decrease in GST-P-positive lesions. Many of these lesions were no longer recognizable as lesions expressing a low PK activity, in SAM-treated rats. However, a relatively small number of GST-P-positive lesions expressing a low PK activity were still present in these rats. These data suggest that glucose channelled into triacylglycerol and pyruvate synthesis decreases in rat liver, during the development of preneoplastic foci, while the production of reducing equivalents and pentose phosphates increases, thus favoring DNA synthesis and detoxification reactions. Decrease in DNA synthesis, in SAM-treated rats, is paralleled by a partial reversion of carbohydrate metabolic features to those present in normal liver.

Animals↗