PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Gordon Moore

Publications and source records attributed to L Gordon Moore.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

An introduction to technology for patient-centered, collaborative care.

"Patient-centered, collaborative care" is healthcare jargon. But underlying the jargon is the principle that a patient who receives such care strongly agrees that "I receive exactly the healthcare I want and need exactly when and how I want and need it." Currently only about 1 in 4 Americans who have adequate financial resources can make this claim. Think of a pyramid. At the apex is the highest level of "patient-centered, collaborative care." At the base are measures about "what's the matter" (from the clinical perspective) and "what matters" (from the patient perspective). As patients and clinicians act collaboratively on these measures, they climb closer to the apex of the pyramid. Given the realities of healthcare in the Unites States, should busy professionals take time to think about ways to climb pyramids? In this "Introduction" we describe why the answer to this rhetorical question ought to be "yes." In the articles that comprise this issue, readers will learn how technology that supports patient-centered, collaborative care can help bridge the gap between desirable goals and limited time. All the authors understand technology (such as hardware and software), and the way humans use the technology (called techne) will not overcome the many obstacles to the attainment of patient-centered, collaborative care. Nevertheless, we are hopeful that the examples described in these articles suggest ways that significant progress toward patient-centered, collaborative care can be made. The articles are practical. The results are persuasive. It is worth the climb!

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The emergence of Ideal Micro Practices for patient-centered, collaborative care.

Ideal Micro Practices are capable of delivering patient-centered collaborative care. With respect to comparable adult patients in "usual" care settings, twice as many patients who use Ideal Micro Practices report they receive care that is "exactly what they want and need exactly when and how they want and need it" (68% vs 35%). Compared to usual care, these very small, low-overhead practices are more likely to have patients report very high levels of continuity (98% vs 88%), efficiency (95% vs 73%), and access (72% vs 53%). Patient ratings of very good information (83% vs 67%) and clinician awareness of pain or emotional problem are also higher (87% vs 69%). However, only a slim majority of patients using Ideal Micro Practices report that they are confident in their ability to manage and control their health problems or concerns. Ideal Micro Practices are sharing new tools and approaches to better understand their patients' needs and increase patients' confidence in their ability to manage conditions. In addition, these practices are working collaboratively to standardize their approaches and make the essential elements of Ideal Micro Practice replicable.

Adult↗