PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Grazzi

Publications and source records attributed to L Grazzi.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Chronic headaches: pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment.

Chronic headaches have increasingly become a focus within the field of head pain. The biological and physiopathological origins of chronic headaches probably reside in receptor physiology, but it is also probable that the initiation and sustaining dynamics of this pathological condition involve several other factors. Not all, but most patients with frequent headache eventually overuse their medications, and when this happens (approximately 1%), the diagnosis of medication-overuse headache is clinically important, because patients rarely respond to preventive medications while overusing acute medications. Properly treating medication overuse and preventing relapse require recognition of the different factors that contribute to its development and perpetuation, including some behaviours and psychological elements that are important in sustaining the overuse of medication. The problems concerning the diagnosis, classification and clinical aspects of chronic headaches are mentioned. Also the different therapeutical approaches, pharmacological and non-pharmacological, initial outcomes and long-term durability of treatment are discussed.

Headache Disorders↗

Magnesium as a treatment for paediatric tension-type headache: a clinical replication series.

The objective was to determine the initial utility of magnesium salt as a treatment for paediatric episodic and chronic tension-type headache (TTH). The study took the form of a clinical replication series in the Outpatient Headache Center at the National Neurological Institute "C. Besta", Milan, Italy. The patients were five children/adolescents with episodic and four with chronic TTH reporting consecutively for treatment. Magnesium pidolate (2.25 g) was given twice per day for two months, with one year of follow-up. No other treatment was provided. Patients with episodic TTH revealed 76.0% symptom reduction, with 80% of the sample achieving reductions greater than 50%. The patients with chronic TTH revealed 87.5% symptom reduction, with 100% of the sample achieving reductions greater than 50%. Analgesic consumption decreased significantly for chronic TTH. Only one child took medication in the episodic TTH group. No significant changes occurred with respect to depression and anxiety, but these measures were not clinically elevated at the start of treatment. Although uncontrolled, the initial findings are encouraging and suggest that further, better controlled research is warranted.

Adolescent↗

Facial pain in children and adolescents.

Facial pain is a debilitating disorder if left untreated. It has been suggested that the most commonly undiagnosed facial pain conditions include neuropathic and myofascial pains because their pathophysiologies are not well understood. Facial neuralgias are otherwise rare in children. They are not acknowledged in most paediatric tests, there are few published reports on them, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) has not been described in children. Some of the most common forms of facial pain will be considered and some considerations concerning the problem of atypical facial pain in young age and its treatment will be discussed.

Adolescent↗

Migraine with aura from pathophysiology to treatment: therapeutic strategies.

Migraine with aura (MwA) sufferers, at times, need specific treatments. This is the case when the auras are frequent, prolonged and cause anxiety and distress. Abnormal release of glutamate, that may trigger auras, and abnormal platelet behaviour, that constitute a possible predisposing factor to MwA, may be possible targets for MwA specific prophylactic therapy. Here we present results obtained by using lamotrigine, an agent known to inhibit glutamate release, and picotamide, an antiplatelet drug. Both drugs significantly reduced, in two open label trials, the frequency and the duration of auras. In comparison with lamotrigine, the therapy with picotamide may offer some advantages, such as the use of the therapeutical dose from the first day of treatment (lamotrigine needs one month to reach such a dose) and the possibility to prevent cerebral ischaemic events and migraine stroke, a rare but severe complication of MwA attacks.

Epilepsy↗

Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis.

This paper reviews results of placebo-controlled trials on topiramate (TPM) prophylaxis in migraine patients, and discusses issues regarding the use of this medication in clinical practice. Data from well conducted double-blind controlled trials and from a comparative trial show that TPM is effective against migraine, confirming the experience of physicians in various countries. Lack of major contraindications, high responder rate, good tolerability at the target dose (100 mg/day) following slow titration, and lack of weight gain make TPM one of the most effective and well accepted drugs for migraine prophylaxis.

Anticonvulsants↗

Naratriptan in the short-term prophylaxis of pure menstrual migraine.

Menstrual migraines are particularly difficult-totreat. Few studies on the use of triptans in short-term prophylaxis of menstrually related migraine have been recently conducted, but evidences of triptans' efficacy in the specific case of pure menstrual migraine (PMM) are lacking. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and tolerability of naratriptan as short-term prophylaxis of pure menstrual migraine (PMM) attacks. A multi-centre, open, non comparative, pilot six-month study was conducted in women, aged 18 years or older, with regular menstrual cycles and with a history of migraine without aura exclusively associated to the perimenstrual period. After an observation period of three months, patients took for three consecutive menstrual cycles oral naratriptan 1 mg twice daily, starting two days before the expected onset of menstruation and continuing for six days. Ninety-eight women with a history of PMM were screened for study participation, and 61 entered the study. Fifty-nine comprised the intent-to-treat population. The mean number of PMM attacks decreased from 3.5+/-1.4 in the 3-month observation period to 1.6+/-1.3 in the 3-month treatment with naratriptan. The pecentage of responders (subjects who recorded a decrease-equal or more than 50%-in the mean number of attacks) was 61.4%. A tendency towards a decrease in headache severity and in the presence of associated symptoms was observed during treatment. At least one adverse event during the treatment period was reported by 19 patients (31.1%). No serious adverse events occurred. Naratriptan may be an effective and safe treatment option in the short-prophylaxis of PMM.

Adolescent↗

Disability and quality of life in different primary headaches: results from Italian studies.

Headaches may have a wide range of impact on patients' lives. We report the results of Italian studies in which disability and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with different primary headaches were evaluated. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) was used to assess HRQOL; the Migraine Disability Assessment Score questionnaire (MIDAS) was used to assess disability in patients with migraine without aura or with chronic migraine. Mean MIDAS total scores were evaluated in migraine without aura and chronic migraine patients. The scores at the eight SF-36 scales were calculated in patients with the three studied headaches, and were compared with Italian normative data (Student's t-test with Bonferroni correction). Primary headaches had a considerable negative impact on patients' lives, with poor quality of life and decreased ability to function in daily duties. The mean MIDAS total score was 23.4 in 264 patients with migraine without aura, and 79.2 in 150 patients with chronic migraine. Mean SF-36 scores in migraine without aura (68 subjects), chronic migraine (84) and cluster headache (56) were lower than those from the Italian general population, with significant differences for 3 scales in migraine without aura, for 6 in chronic migraine, and for all scales in cluster headache. Our results confirmed a marked personal and social burden in patients with migraine without aura, and also in the less well-studied forms of primary headaches, cluster headache and chronic migraine.

Adult↗

Measuring responses to therapy in headache patients: new and traditional end-points.

Changes in numerical indices of the intensity, duration and frequency of attacks are traditionally used to assess the effectiveness of treatments for migraine and other primary headaches. However, recent clinical and therapeutic guidelines and guidelines for conducting clinical trials specify that the essential aim of symptomatic and prophylactic migraine treatments should be to reduce the global impact of the headaches on the patient's life. Some standardised instruments for assessing disability and health-related quality of life seem sensitive to treatment-induced changes in primary headache patients. However, further studies to determine the suitability of these instruments as outcome measures in clinical practice are necessary.

Disability Evaluation↗

Disability in young patients suffering from primary headaches.

During the last decade researchers have begun to employ standardised methodologies to investigate the global impact of primary headaches. Disease-specific instruments have been developed to measure headache-related disability. The MIDAS Questionnaire, which is the most extensively studied of these instruments, was designed to assess the overall impact of headaches over the 3 months before compilation. The MIDAS Questionnaire is an optimal tool to assess headache-related disability in adults in relation to patients' daily activities. Primary headaches are a recurrent problem for children and adolescents. Forty percent of children have experienced headaches by the age of 7 years increasing to 75% by the age of 15. In a recent report we determined the suitability of the MIDAS Questionnaire in its original form for assessing disability in children and adolescents suffering from different kinds of headache. This was the first step of a line of research aimed to develop a new MIDAS Questionnaire adapted for young patients. In this second study the aims were: (1) to produce a new version of the MIDAS Questionnaire specific for young patients suffering from different forms of headache; (2) to assess the reliability of this new instrument; (3) to assess its sensitivity to treatment intervention.

Adolescent↗

Strategies for the treatment of autonomic trigeminal cephalalgias.

Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) are a group of primary headache syndromes characterised by two main clinical characteristics: pain and oculofacial autonomic phenomena. Three headache forms are grouped as TACs: cluster headache (CH), paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT). These are distinguished mainly on the basis of attack duration. It lasts from 15 to 180 min in CH, from 2 to 30 min in PH and from 5 to 240 s in SUNCT. The most effective drug preventative in PH is indomethacin even if in few cases other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been reported to be effective. SUNCT is commonly described as drug resistant. Recent studies report that lamotrigin may be the drug of choice for SUNCT.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Headache in children and adolescents: conventional and unconventional approaches to treatment.

Headache is one of the most common conditions to affect children and adolescents in industrialised countries. Studies indicate a prevalence of 8% to 60%. In over 40% of migraineurs the condition begins before 18 years of age. For clinical researchers, headache in the young is of interest because its causes are easier to investigate than in older people, as the clinical history is brief, the condition has had no time to become chronic, and it is not accompanied by changes in pain neuromodulation and neurotransmission, or the development of a chronic pain/stress-related personality that is common in adults with longstanding headache. The wide variation in reported headache prevalence in young people may be ascribed to lack of representativity of studies and vagueness of diagnostic criteria in studies performed before 1988. The publication of the International Headache Society IHS classification in 1988 for the first time made it possible to accurately diagnose the various headache forms. The diagnostic criteria for adults were adopted for use in young patients. Since that time a burgeoning number of studies on headache in young people have been published.

Acetaminophen↗

Primary headaches in children and adolescents.

Headache is one of the commonest conditions to affect children and adolescents in industrialised countries. Studies indicate a prevalence of 8-60%. In over 40% of migraineurs the condition begins before 18 years of age. For clinical researchers, headache in the young is of interest because its causes are easier to investigate than in older people, as the clinical history is brief, the condition has had no time to become chronic, and it is not accompanied by changes in pain neuromodulation and neurotransmission, or the development of a chronic pain/stress-related personality that is common in adults with longstanding headache. The wide variation in reported headache prevalence in young people may be ascribed to lack of representativity of studies and vagueness of diagnostic criteria in studies performed before 1988. The publication of the International Headache Society IHS classification in 1988 for the first time made it possible to accurately diagnose the various headache forms. The diagnostic criteria for adults were adopted for use in young patients. Since that time a burgeoning number of studies on headache in young people have been published.

Adolescent↗

MIDAS questionnaire modification for a new MIDAS junior questionnaire: a clinical experience at the Neurological Institute "C. Besta".

During the last decade researchers have begun to employ standardised methodologies to investigate the global impact of primary headaches. Disease-specific instruments have been developed to measure headache-related disability. The MIDAS questionnaire, which is the most extensively studied of these instruments, was designed to assess the overall impact of headaches over the 3 months before compilation. The MIDAS questionnaire is an optimal tool to assess headache-related disability in adults in relation to patients' daily activities. Primary headaches are a recurrent problem for children and adolescents. Forty percent of children have experienced headaches by the age of 7 years increasing to 75% by the age of 15. In a recent report we determined the suitability of the MIDAS questionnaire in its original form for assessing disability in children and adolescents suffering from different kinds of headache. This was the first step of a line of research aimed to develop a new MIDAS questionnaire adapted for young patients. In this second study the aims were: (1) to produce a new version of the MIDAS questionnaire specific for young patients suffering from different forms of headache; (2) to assess the reliability of this new instrument; (3) to assess its sensitivity to treatment intervention.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacological behavioural treatment for children and adolescents with tension-type headache: preliminary data.

Recurrent headaches are a significant health problem for young patients. Most current investigations have employed limited modalities (either medication or behavioural) and few have included treatment comparisons. The purpose of this study was to compare relaxation training (provided in a limited contact format) and amitriptyline in the treatment of young tension-type headache (TTH) sufferers. Follow-up is planned for 3, 6 and 12 months, at which time patients complete headache logs and an Italian version of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire that has been adapted for this age group. Two groups of TTH sufferers of similar age and characteristics were studied. Clinical results, MIDAS total score, and individual values for items A and B were collected at the first follow-up (3 months). The clinical improvement is significant for both groups. Although the clinical results are similar in both groups, relaxation therapy seems to be more accepted than pharmacological therapy. These data, however, are preliminary and the sample sizes are small, so these conclusions are tentative. We will continue our data collection for 12 months.

Adolescent↗

Chronic migraine with medication overuse: treatment outcome and disability at 3 years follow-up.

Patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse are particularly difficult to treat. No clear consensus exists about treatment strategies to be used and little data exists about the functional impact of headache in these patients. The purpose of the study was to determine (1) the clinical course of a sample of chronic migraine patients with medication overuse 36 months following treatment intervention and (2) whether functional impairment, assessed by the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire, improved upon treatment. Of 106 patients meeting the criteria for chronic migraine with medication overuse (according to Silberstein and Lipton), 71 went on to complete a structured inpatient treatment, consisting of medication withdrawal and then prophylactic treatment. As a group, the patients were significantly improved at 36-month follow-up, with respect to 2 headache parameters (days of headache per month and number of used medications per month assessed by the diary card) and 2 measures of functional impact extracted from the MIDAS questionnaire (MIDAS total score and frequency of headache). Chronic migraine accompanied with medication overuse led to considerable disability prior to treatment. However, notable improvement both in headache parameters and in disability measures occurred concurrently with treatment. This suggests that successful treatment has more wide-ranging positive benefits beyond mere symptom reduction. To our knowledge, this is the first investigation where the MIDAS questionnaire has been used as an outcome measure in patients with chronic headache to assess disability during such a long follow-up period.

Chronic Disease↗

Selective vs. complete family interview for detecting those affected by familial cluster headache.

This study validates the method of interviewing only the first-degree relatives indicated by the proband as possible cluster headache sufferers. We interviewed essentially all the first-degree relatives (93%) of 87 probands with cluster headache. We found only one new first-degree relative with cluster headache (1/40 = 2.5%). The selective interview may be used with confidence as a means of investigating the hereditary component of cluster headache.

Adolescent↗

Quality of life and disability in primary chronic daily headaches.

We assessed functional disability and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Italian patients suffering from chronic migraine and medication overuse (150 subjects) or chronic cluster headache (22 subjects). We used the validated Italian versions of the Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS) and of the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Patients with both conditions were characterised by significantly lower scores on most SF-36 scales than Italian normative data (Student's t test with Bonferroni correction). MIDAS scores revealed that patients had severe limitations in their ability to function, with high proportions forced to stop work and non-work activities, or experiencing significantly reduced productivity in all activity domains. These findings show that primary chronic headaches have a marked negative influence on patients' lives, compromising their sense of well being and their ability to function in different roles. We also found that MIDAS and SF-36 were sensitive to clinical changes in a group of 84 patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse who completed the both questionnaires before and after treatment.

Activities of Daily Living↗