PubMedDate not supplied
The seclusion of patients with mental health problems is a controversial and emotive subject, and is a practice that was condemned by the Ashworth Inquiry (Department of Health (DoH), 1992). Despite this condemnation, it is still widely practised today. Opinions on the practice of seclusion vary greatly. Consequently, there is a need to review the theoretical and empirical literature regarding the use of seclusion in order to gain an understanding of the current state of the knowledge base in this substantive and controversial area. This article systematically reviews research published between 1994 and 1999 and discusses the findings under three headings: staff/patient attitudes to seclusion; the alternatives to seclusion; and the efficacy of seclusion. The reviewed material shows that seclusion is seen as a legitimate intervention by some hospital staff, but is "dreaded" by mental health patients. What is also evident is that seclusion is largely believed to be effective and that no true alternatives to its use exist. However, there appears to be no formal means of determining what constitutes an effective intervention in the management of violent incidents. Implications for practice and areas for future study are also discussed.
Attitude of Health Personnel↗