PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Hanin

Publications and source records attributed to L Hanin.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Speechreading enhancement: a comparison of spatial-tactile display of voice fundamental frequency (F0) with auditory F0.

In two experiments, subjects repeated video-recorded sentences presented via speechreading with and without enhancement by a sensory input derived from the acoustic speech signal. Enhancement was measured as percentage increase in recognized words. In experiment 1, tactile presentation of fundamental frequency (F0) provided, after training, for three of four postlingually deafened adults a mean enhancement of 11%. In experiment 2, using six hearing adults, the auditory presentation of F0 provided a mean enhancement of 50%. This value fell, but only to 37%, when the F0 signal was derived from the processor of the tactile aid used in experiment 1. From these experiments it can be concluded that the unexpectedly small enhancement found in experiment 1 is probably due both to the fact that this tactile aid was not providing effective access to all of the information available in the F0 contour and to limitations related to the tactile processing ability of the kinaesthetic system.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences.

Recognition of words in conversational sentences of known topic was measured in nine normally hearing subjects by speechreading alone and by speechreading supplemented with auditory presentation of the output of an electroglottograph. Mean word recognition probability rose from 30% to 77% with the addition of the acoustic signal. When this signal was filtered to remove possible high-frequency spectral cues, the supplemented score fell, but only by a marginally significant 7 percentage points, supporting the conclusion that voice fundamental frequency was the principal source of enhancement. Enhancement occurred for all subjects, regardless of speechreading competence.

Communication Devices for People with Disabilities↗
PubMed1988

Tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as an aid to the speechreading of sentences.

In two experiments, the perception of words in sentences was measured by speechreading with and without tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency (F0). The first experiment involved normally hearing subjects and two kinds of tactile display of F0: (1) a spatial, multichannel display; and (2) a temporal, single-channel display. Mean performance with the tactile displays was found to be slightly, but significantly, better than speechreading alone, but no significant difference was found between the two displays. The second experiment involved hearing-impaired subjects and only the spatial, multi-channel display of F0. For all three subjects, after extended training, speechreading performance was significantly better with the addition of the tactile display than by speechreading alone. The improvement amounted to reductions of word recognition error of 24, 33, and 50% in the three subjects.

Adult↗