Biomedical subjects

L Hilborne

Publications and source records attributed to L Hilborne.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Visual function impairments in relation to gender, age, and visual acuity in patients who undergo cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the relationship between visual function impairment in 776 patients who had extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and gender, age, preoperative visual acuity (VA) of both the operative and the contralateral eye, and presence of other ocular disease in the operative eye. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 1139 patients whose medical records were abstracted and who had cataract surgery performed at 1 of 10 participating academic medical centers in 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In the 776 patients who had explicit statements about impairment of visual function documented in their medical records, univariate and multivariable logistic analyses were used to assess the above relationship. RESULTS: The most severe visual functional deficit that justified the cataract operation varied in relation to gender, age, and VA. On bivariate analysis, men were more likely to have impairment with employment, driving, and glare, whereas women were more likely to have impairment with activities of daily living and recreational activities. Significant findings between visual impairment and the independent variables from the logistic regression models included: (1) employment limitation and male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-3.40); (2) employment limitation and younger age (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.050-0.28 for ages 70-79); (3) recreational impairment and older age (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.64-4.70 for ages 80+); (4) impairment in performing activities of daily living and female gender (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98 for male gender); (5) impairment in performing activities of daily living and worse VA in the operative eye (OR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.93-9.00 for VA < 20/100); (6) glare-associated impairment and younger age (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.69 for age 80+); and (7) glare-associated impairment and better VA (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.067-0.38 for VA < 20/100). CONCLUSION: When deciding whether to perform cataract surgery, functional impairment must be considered in relation to the age and the gender of the patient, for the type of functional impairment varies in association with age and gender.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1997

Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures: application of a clinical method.

OBJECTIVES: Our main objective was to apply a new method to determine whether coronary revascularization procedures are underused, especially among African-Americans and uninsured patients. BACKGROUND: Although overuse of revascularization procedures has been studied, underuse as defined clinically has not been examined before. METHODS: The study was conducted at four public and two academically affiliated private hospitals in Los Angeles; 671 patients who underwent coronary angiography between June 1, 1990 and September 30, 1991 and met explicit clinical criteria for coronary revascularization were included. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients undergoing an indicated procedure within 12 months (ascertained by medical record review and confirmed with a telephone survey). Adjusted relative odds of undergoing an indicated procedure for African-Americans and patients in public hospitals compared with whites and patients in private hospitals were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 75% of patients underwent a revascularization procedure. Of 424 patients requiring bypass surgery, 107 angioplasty and 140 either bypass surgery or angioplasty, 59%, 66% and 75% underwent the procedure, respectively. African-Americans were less likely than whites to undergo operation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.49, p < 0.05) and angioplasty (adjusted OR 0.20, p < 0.05). Patients in public hospitals were less likely than those in private hospitals to undergo angioplasty (adjusted OR 0.10, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures is measurable and occurs to a significant degree even among insured patients attending private hospitals. Underuse is especially pronounced among African-Americans and patients attending public hospitals. Future cost-containment efforts must incorporate safeguards against underuse of necessary care.

Black or African American↗

PubMed1997

Influence of projected complication rates on estimated appropriate use rates for carotid endarterectomy. Appropriateness Project Investigators. Academic Medical Center Consortium.

OBJECTIVE: To examine specifically the influence of estimated perioperative mortality and stroke rate on the assessment of appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: An expert panel convened to rate the appropriateness of a variety of potential indications for carotid endarterectomy based on various rates of perioperative complications. We then applied these ratings to the charts of 1,160 randomly selected patients who had carotid endarterectomy in one of the 12 participating academic medical centers. STUDY DESIGN: An expert panel evaluated indications for carotid endarterectomy using the modified Delphi approach. Charts of patients who received surgery were abstracted, and clinical indications for the procedure as well as perioperative complications were recorded. To examine the impact of surgical risk assessment on the rates of appropriateness, three different definitions of risk strata for combined perioperative death or stroke were used: Definition A, low risk < 3 percent; Definition B, low risk < 5 percent; and Definition C, low risk < 7 percent. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Overall hospital-specific mortality ranged from 0 percent to 4.0 percent and major complications, defined as death, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or myocardial infarction, varied from 2.0 percent to 11.1 percent. Most patients (72 percent) had surgery for transient ischemic attack or stroke; 24 percent of patients were asymptomatic. Most patients (82 percent) had surgery on the side of a high-grade stenosis (70-99 percent). When the thresholds for operative risk were placed at the values defined by the expert panel (Definition A), only 33.5 percent of 1,160 procedures were classified as "appropriate." When the definition of low risk was shifted upward, the proportion of cases categorized as appropriate increased to 58 percent and 81.5 percent for Definitions B and C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high proportion of procedures performed for symptomatic patients with a high degree of ipsilateral extracranial carotid artery stenosis and generally low rates of surgical complications at the participating institutions, the overall rate of "appropriateness" using a perioperative complication rate of < 3 percent was low. However, the rate of "appropriateness" was extremely sensitive to judgments about a single clinical feature, surgical risk. These data show that before applying such "appropriateness" ratings, it is crucial to perform sensitivity analyses in order to assess the stability of the results. Results that are robust to moderate in variation in surgical risk provide a much sounder basis for policy making than those that are not.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed1996

Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers.

PURPOSE: To determine the adequacy of documenting the preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery using criteria derived from published practice guidelines. METHODS: In 1990, 1139 surgeries that were performed on 1139 patients at ten institutions of the Academic Medical Center Consortium were reviewed for completeness of documentation of the preoperative evaluation. Criteria for completeness were derived from the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern on cataract evaluation and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research-sponsored guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of charts lacked documentation of at least one of four basic elements of the preoperative evaluation. These four elements are (1) vision in the surgical eye; (2) vision in the fellow eye; (3) evaluation of the fundus, macula, or visual potential in the surgical eye: and (4) presence of some form (general or specific) of functional visual impairment. If, as stated in the guideline, a specific deficit in visual functioning should be identified, then 40% of charts fail to meet criteria. CONCLUSION: Documentation of the ocular preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is inadequate in more than one quarter of cases. The relation between lack of documentation and incompleteness of the examination is unknown. Improved documentation is needed to better measure and enhance the quality of care.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed1996

Assessment of appropriateness of cataract surgery at ten academic medical centers in 1990.

PURPOSE: To develop criteria for the appropriateness of cataract surgery (extracapsular cataract extraction or phacoemulsification with planned implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens) and to apply these criteria to patients from ten academic medical centers. METHODS: The study is a retrospective case series from ten academic medical centers. One thousand one hundred thirty-nine patients who had had cataract surgery in 1990 at the medical centers were selected randomly. Patients, identified by specific ICD-9-CM or CPT-4 codes, had no other ocular surgery performed at the same time as cataract surgery. Rates of inappropriate, uncertain, appropriate, and appropriate and crucial surgeries were determined by application of the criteria established by a multidisciplinary expert panel. RESULTS: Approximately 2% of the procedures were classified as inappropriate, after adjusting for missing or nonspecific visual function by use of discriminant analysis. Ninety-one percent of the procedures were classified as appropriate (52%) or appropriate and crucial (39%). Seven percent were designated as uncertain, either due to a median rating in the uncertain range or to disagreement in ratings among the panelists. Significant variation occurred in the results among the different institutions: inappropriate surgeries ranged from 0% to 4%, uncertain from 1% to 14%, appropriate from 35% to 66%, and appropriate and crucial from 21% to 62% (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: A small percentage of cataract surgeries was performed at these ten academic medical centers for inappropriate indications using the study criteria. Given the large number of cataract surgeries performed annually, the small percentage of uncertain and inappropriate surgeries may translate into a large number of surgeries performed for less than appropriate or appropriate and crucial indications. Significant variation existed among the institutions in the distribution of appropriate and crucial and appropriate compared with uncertain and inappropriate surgeries.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed1996

STAT testing? A guideline for meeting clinician turnaround time requirements. Practice parameter.

This practice parameter, developed by the Practice Parameters and Outcomes Measurement Committee of the American Society of Clinical Pathologists (ASCP), is a guideline for the development of reasonable stat lists. Stat testing lists vary according to practice setting. Furthermore, although stat lists exist, extenuating clinical circumstances may warrant performing a test stat that is otherwise considered routine. Successful development of a stat testing list requires organizations to take an interdisciplinary approach, focusing on clinical and operational considerations of both the care provider and the clinical laboratory.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed1995

The link between the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and medical administration. Managing the quality continuum.

As hospital-based physicians, pathologists are positioned to play a key role in quality management at their institutions. As we enter into the era of increased competition for scarce health care resources, opportunities to increase efficiency, improve quality, and reduce expenses will expand. Laboratory medicine specialists possess much needed expertise in data management and quality improvement. Pathologists must now reach beyond their own departments, redefining their mission through a focus on clinical-managerial relationships.

Laboratories, Hospital↗

PubMed1993

HPV DNA and the risk of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix in young women.

A population-based case-control study of college students was undertaken to estimate the effect of a positive clinical test for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA (the Virapap test) on the rate of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) of the uterine cervix. When age, multiple lifetime sexual partners, and oral contraceptive use were controlled by logistic regression, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for a positive Virapap test was 7.3 (3.3, 17) for a cytologic diagnosis of SILs and 3.4 (1.4, 8.5) for a cytologic diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions of undetermined significance (equivocal atypia). When case status was defined as patients whose Pap smears were confirmed histologically as high-grade SIL, the adjusted OR was 10.3 (3.3, 32), reflecting the high proportion of individuals with SILs who were harboring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. These results confirm the many previous findings of a strong association between HPV DNA, and demonstrate that strength of the association persists when important confounding variables are controlled. This suggests a causal role for HPV in cervical neogenesis. Believing that HPV infection is a major causal agent for cervical cancer precursors suggests that in this time of rapidly increasing HPV prevalence, especially among young persons, the incidence of cervical neoplasia will rise. This underscores the importance of increasing the availability, usage, and perhaps the frequency of Pap smear screening.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Modified technique for fine needle aspiration biopsy that eliminates needle manipulation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a modified technique of fine needle aspiration biopsy that eliminates needle manipulation after aspiration. STUDY DESIGN: Fine needle aspiration biopsy of 112 palpable lesions was performed using both the conventional and modified techniques. Cellularity, cell preservation and diagnostic yield of the new procedure were compared to those of the conventional technique. RESULTS: Cytologic smears prepared from each method were comparable in quality, quantity and diagnostic yield. CONCLUSION: The modified approach eliminates the hazard of needle manipulation without diminishing the diagnostic efficacy of fine needle aspiration biopsy.

Biopsy, Needle↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: To assess criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary artery revascularization procedures in terms of patient outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using medical records supplemented by a telephone survey and review of county death records. SETTING: Four public hospitals and two academically affiliated private hospitals in Los Angeles County, California. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 671 patients who had coronary angiography between June 1, 1990 and September 30, 1991, and who met explicit clinical criteria for the necessity of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For all patients (n = 671), we estimated the association between receipt of necessary revascularization and mortality (median follow-up after angiography, 797 days) after adjusting for potential confounders. For the patients completing the telephone interview (n = 374), we examined the relationship between receipt of necessary revascularization and frequency of chest pain. RESULTS: Patients who received necessary revascularization within 1 year of angiography had lower mortality than those who did not (8.7% vs 15.8%, P = .01), and this association persisted after adjustment for extent of coronary artery disease, clinical symptom complex, ejection fraction, and cardiac surgical risk index (adjusted odds ratio = 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.28 to 0.86). The same general results were obtained whether revascularization was received within 1 year or within 30 days of the catheterization, whether panelists' ratings or individual clinical variables were entered as covariates, and whether the statistical procedure used was logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards analysis. In addition, among patients responding to the telephone survey, those receiving necessary revascularization had less chest pain at follow-up (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients meeting criteria for the necessity of revascularization, those receiving a revascularization procedure within 1 year had lower mortality than those treated medically. These results support the validity of the RAND/UCLA criteria for detecting underuse of these procedures, but more research is needed to confirm the findings and to determine the validity of guidelines for other procedures.

Aged↗