Several investigators have suggested that affectively disordered patients have dysfunction of the nondominant cerebral hemisphere. The present study tested this hypothesis using psychometrically matched measures of verbal and visual-spatial skills. A sample of 64 psychiatric in-patients and out-patients was interviewed using an expanded and modified version of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule and diagnosed using the criteria of DSM-III-R, the Research Diagnostic Criteria, and the Feighner et al. system. Patients diagnosed as affectively disordered by at least one system were administered a pair of psychometrically matched measures: a measure of Word-Finding modeled after the Boston Naming Test, and a measure of visual-spatial functioning adapted from the Dot-Localization task. Patients with diagnoses of major depression by any of the three systems showed significantly poorer performance on Dot Localization than on Word Finding. Differences for patients with bipolar diagnoses were in the same direction but fell short of significance. These results support the hypothesis that patients with major depressive disorders may show impaired right-hemisphere functioning.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The interview process for the selection of student radiographers.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Educational Measurement↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Agricultural safety efforts by county health departments in Wisconsin.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to improve the agriculture safety prevention efforts of county health departments in Wisconsin by examining current programs, staffs' perceptions of the farm safety problem, and the need for new resources. METHODS: A survey instrument was completed by a professional staff member of the local health department in each of Wisconsin's 69 counties. RESULTS: Usable responses were obtained from 84% of the counties. Forty-five percent of the responding staff members conducted some agricultural safety and health programs, most often health screenings or group meetings conducted collaboratively with county agricultural Extension agents. There were no major differences in county demographics or other service provision variables between staff members who conducted programs and those who did not. Staff members perceived the largest barriers to better safety as lack of staff time and difficulty getting farmers to attend safety programs. Most failed to place more emphasis on training agricultural workers to permanently correct hazards than on training them to work safely around hazards. However, the staff members ranked safety inspection checklists as the most needed new material and ranked Extension agents and farmers as the most appropriate people to conduct inspections using such checklists. CONCLUSION: County public health professionals want more staff time and new materials to increase the effectiveness of their agricultural safety efforts. Encouraging agricultural workers and family members to identify and correct hazards would be a more effective use of staff time than training people to work safely around hazards.

Adult↗