PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L J Garred

Publications and source records attributed to L J Garred.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Evaluation of high-flux hemodiafiltration efficiency using an on-line urea monitor.

On-line urea monitoring of the effluent dialysate offers a real-time assessment of dialysis efficiency and metabolic/nutritional characteristics of hemodialysis patients. Quantitative parameters were evaluated by dialysate urea kinetic modeling (DUKM) with an on-line urea sensor in 23 patients treated by high-flux hemodiafiltration (HDF) (215 sessions of 210 to 240 minutes with a mean blood flow rate of 367 +/- 44 mL/min). Overall, the mean effective Kt/V was 1.52 +/- 0.29, the urea mass removed (22.8 +/- 5.5 g/session or 814 +/- 198 mmol/session), the solute removal index (SRI) 73% +/- 6.1%, and the mean normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), 1.15 +/- 0.31 g/kg/day. Blood urea kinetic modeling (BUKM), based on pre- and postsession urea concentrations, using equations from Daugirdas and Garred to calculate equilibrated Kt/V and nPCR, respectively, were in good agreement with DUKM, the differences observed appearing not clinically relevant. The variability of evaluated parameters was verified over consecutive sessions for a mean period of 3 weeks in the entire group. Mean variation in Kt/V was 8%; in urea mass removal, 18%; and in nPCR, 18%. When assessed over 1 week in a subgroup of 13 patients, Kt/V and PCR remained relatively stable, and urea mass removal per- and postsession declined from 23.5 +/- 8.0 g (840 +/- 285 mmol) to 18.7 +/- 6.3 g (667 +/- 225 mmol) from the first to the third session of the week, most likely as a consequence of interdialytic intervals. Predialysis urea concentrations followed the same trend. In the current study, DUKM with on-line urea sensor has confirmed that HDF is a highly efficient renal replacement modality; the variability observed in quantitative parameters supports a need for frequent adequacy monitoring. On-line urea monitoring of effluent dialysate is a simple device that provides the opportunity to tailor treatment to patient needs.

Blood Urea Nitrogen↗
PubMed1998

Catabolism in critical illness: estimation from urea nitrogen appearance and creatinine production during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Thirty-eight intensive care unit (ICU) patients (26 men and 12 women with a mean age of 57.0 +/- 16.6 years) with acute renal failure (ARF) treated by venovenous continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were evaluated while in relatively steady metabolic control. Twenty-seven were undergoing continuous venovenous hemodialysis, nine were undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, and two were undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Periods of analysis varied between 24 and 408 hours (mean duration, 82.7 +/- 70.6 hours; median, 72 hours). Their mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score within 24 hours of admission to the ICU was 21.3 +/- 6.3 and survival rate was 31.6%. Urea nitrogen and creatinine concentrations were determined every 6 to 12 hours in both serum (Cun and Cc, respectively) and effluent (spent dialysate and/or ultrafiltrate). The mean effluent rate was 1,472 +/- 580 mL/h and blood flow rate, 166 +/- 32 mL/min. Urine was collected daily for urea nitrogen and creatinine measurement. Urea nitrogen appearance rate (UnA) and creatinine production rate (Pc), calculated from urea nitrogen (UnMR) and creatinine mass removal (CMR) from both the effluent and the urine, using Garred mass balance equations and the Forbes-Bruining formula, allowed normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) and estimates of lean body mass (LBM) to be derived. Creatinine metabolic degradation rate (Dc), estimated by the Mitch formula, was included in the calculation. The lowest body weight recorded during the study period was considered as dry weight (BW). The creatinine index (CI) was also obtained. For each parameter, the results are presented as mean, median, and range values: UnMRe (from effluent), 13.6 +/- 7.2, 12.5, 1.6 to 32.6 mg/min; UnMRu (from urine), 0.13 +/- 0.40, 0, 0 to 2.30 mg/min; UnA, 13.6 +/- 7.0, 12.5, 3.8 to 32.1 mg/min; nPCR, 1.75 +/- 0.82, 1.60, 0.61 to 4.23 g/kg/d; CMRe (from effluent), 942.0 +/- 362.3, 918.0, 211.2 to 1,641.6 mg/d; CMRu (from urine), 44.4 +/- 138.8, 0, 0 to 698.5 mg/d; Dc, 94.6 +/- 49.9, 81.9, 31.0 to 294.1 mg/d; Pc total, 1,067.1 +/- 409.7, 1,053.7, 261.5 to 1,988.2 mg/d; LBM, 38.3 +/- 11.9, 37.9, 15.0 to 65.0 kg; LBM/BW ratio, 49.5% +/- 14.0%, 50.3%, 22.5% to 86.0%; and CI, 13.7 +/- 4.7, 14.2, 4.1 to 25.8 mg/kg/d. When Pc was estimated from the Cockcroft-Gault equations (as Pc'), the mean value for Pc and Pc' was similar (1,067.1 +/- 409.7 v 1,284.9 +/- 484.1 mg/d), but there were relatively large differences for the majority of cases. A positive correlation was observed between UnA and Pc (R = 0.42). Serum albumin and LBM/BW correlated poorly (R = 0.20). Outcome was weakly related to UnA and to nPCR (R = 0.29 and R = 0.31, respectively). Urea nitrogen appearance appears widely variable in critically ill ARF patients. This simple approach can provide useful information for an easy estimate of net protein catabolism in critically ill patients with ARF undergoing CRRT.

APACHE↗
PubMed1997

Protein catabolic rate over lean body mass ratio: a more rational approach to normalize the protein catabolic rate in dialysis patients.

Protein catabolic rate (PCR), equivalent to dietary protein intake in "stable" dialysis patients, is widely accepted as a marker of their protein nutritional status. PCR is usually established from urea generation rate using urea kinetic modeling (UKM), but the normalizing factor is still a matter of controversy. By convention, PCR is expressed in grams of protein degraded daily divided by the dry body weight (BW) (nPCRBW). To be valid, this implies that dry BW is close to ideal BW and that body composition is preserved with a lean body mass (LBM) over BW ratio near 0.73. Such conditions being infrequently found in dialysis patients, it has been proposed to normalize PCR to ideal BW or to total body water, but these correction factors are not really appropriate. A more rational approach would be to express PCR as the ratio of protein degraded to the kilograms of LBM (nPCRLBM), thus offering the main advantage of directly coupling PCR to changes in protein or nitrogen reserve. In this study, we developed a combined kinetic model of urea and creatinine applied to the midweek dialysis cycle in 66 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. UKM provided Kt/V and PCR, whereas creatinine kinetic modeling (CKM) was used to calculate LBM. Thirty-four patients with a preserved LBM (LBM/dry BW ratio equal to or greater than 0.70; mean ratio, 0.81 +/- 0.11) and with a dry/ideal BW ratio of 1.01 +/- 0.16 had a mean PCR of 1.14 +/- 0.30 g/kg/24 h when normalized to BW (nPCRBW) and of 1.40 +/- 0.30 g/kg/24 h when normalized to LBM (nPCRLBM). In the 32 patients with a reduced LBM (LBM/dry BW ratio, below 0.70; mean ratio, 0.60 +/- 0.09) and dry/ideal BW ratio of 1.11 +/- 0.23, the mean nPCRBW was 0.99 +/- 0.31 g/kg/24 h, whereas nPCRLBM was 1.62 +/- 0.32 g/kg/24 h. For both subgroups, Kt/V was similar, with mean values of 1.76 +/- 0.34 and 1.69 +/- 0.27. Normalizing PCR to LBM offers a double benefit: it compensates for the error induced by abnormal body composition (eg, obese patients) and permits PCR to be adjusted for the decrease in LBM that occurs with age. We propose nPCRLBM as a more rational index to express PCR in dialysis patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement.

The "gold standard" method to evaluate the mass balances achieved during dialysis for a given solute remains total dialysate collection (TDC). However, since handling over 100 liter volumes is unfeasible in our current dialysis units, alternative methods have been proposed, including urea kinetic modeling, partial dialysate collection (PDC) and more recently, monitoring of dialysate urea by on-line devices. Concerned by the complexity and costs generated by these devices, we aimed to adapt the simple "gold standard" TDC method to clinical practice by diminishing the total volumes to be handled. We describe a new system based on partial dialysate collection, the continuous spent sampling of dialysate (CSSD), and present its technical validation. Further, and for the first time, we report a long-term assessment of dialysis dosage in a dialysis clinic using both the classical PDC and the new CSSD system in a group of six stable dialysis patients who were followed for a period of three years. For the CSSD technique, spent dialysate was continuously sampled by a reversed automatic infusion pump at a rate of 10 ml/hr. The piston was automatically driven by the dialysis machine: switched on when dialysis started, off when dialysis terminated and held during the by pass periods. At the same time the number of production cycles of dialysate was monitored and the total volume of dialysate was calculated by multiplying the volume of the production chamber by the number of cycles. Urea and creatinine concentrations were measured in the syringe and the masses were obtained by multiplying this concentration by the total volume. CSSD and TDC were simultaneously performed in 20 dialysis sessions. The total mass of urea removed was calculated as 58038 and 60442 mmol/session (CSSD and TDC respectively; 3.1 +/- 1.2% variation; r = 0.99; y = 0.92x -28.9; P < 0.001). The total mass of creatinine removed was 146,941,143 and 150,071,195 mumol/session (2.2 +/- 0.9% variation; r = 0.99; y = 0.99x + 263; P < 0.001). To determine the long-term clinical use of PDC and CSSD, all the dialysis sessions monitored during three consecutive summers with PDC (during 1993 and 1994) and with CSSD (1995) in six stable dialysis patients were included. The clinical study comparing PDC and CSSD showed similar urea removal: 510 +/- 59 during the first year with PDC and 516 +/- 46 mmol/dialysis session during the third year, using CSSD. Protein catabolic rate (PCR) could be calculated from total urea removal and was 1.05 +/- 0.11 and 1.05 +/- 0.09 g/kg/day with PDC and CSSD for the same periods. PCR values were clearly more stable when calculated from the daily dialysate collections than when obtained with urea kinetic modeling performed once monthly. We found that CSSD is a simple and accurate method to monitor mass balances of urea or any other solute of clinical interest. With CSSD, dialysis efficacy can be monitored at every dialysis session without the need for bleeding a patient. As it is external to the dialysis machine, it can be attached to any type of machine with a very low cost. The sample of dialysate is easy to handle, since it is already taken in a syringe that is sent directly to the laboratory. The CSSD system is currently in routine use in our unit and has demonstrated its feasibility, low cost and high clinical interest in monitoring dialysis patients.

Creatinine↗
PubMed1997

Urea rebound and delivered Kt/V determination with a continuous urea sensor.

BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of urea sensors for dialysis monitoring has made possible new approaches to urea kinetic modelling. In this study we show how the equilibrated postdialysis urea concentration (Ceq) and Kt/V corrected for double-pool urea kinetics (Kt/Vdp) can be accurately determined using an on-line sensor providing a continuous measure of blood water urea. A modification of the Smye constant volume double-pool theory led to the following equations for Ceq and Kt/Vdp [formula: see text] where Cpre is the blood concentration measured at the start of dialysis, t is the length of the dialysis session (in min) and S(ex) is the constant slope of the blood urea logarithm concentration decline following development of the intercompartmental urea concentration gradient in the first 30-60 min of dialysis. METHODS: These equations were tested in 11 patients undergoing 165-240 min of paired filtration dialysis with continuous monitoring of blood urea concentration. Cpre was determined as the plateau concentration during a preliminary period of 15-20 min of slow isolated ultrafiltration. S(ex) was accurately determined from linear regression applied to the urea sensor data from the 80-min point to the end of dialysis. RESULTS: Ceq and Kt/Vdp determined from the above equations compared closely to values determined from 25-40 min of urea rebound monitoring with the urea sensor: 10.6 +/- 3.0 versus 10.8 +/- 2.7 mmol/l (mean +/- SD) for Ceq and 1.21 +/- 0.24 versus 1.18 +/- 0.20 for Kt/Vdp, compared to single-pool values of Kt/V = 1.34 +/- 0.23. CONCLUSION: This technique may be readily programmed into on-line urea monitors to provide current and extrapolated values of Ceq and Kt/Vdp from about the first hour of dialysis.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Equations for the calculation of the protein catabolic rate from predialysis and postdialysis urea concentrations and residual renal clearance in stable hemodialysis patients.

Several simple equations exist for the calculation of K1/V from predialysis (Cpre) and postdialysis (Cpost) measurements of urea concentration. Analogous equations are needed for precise determination of patients protein catabolic rate (nPCR) from Cpre and Cpost. In this study we develop three simple nPCR equations from urea mass balance theory. The equations, which include a term for residual function, may be applied to any session of the week for patient dialyzed three times weekly who are in steady state with respect to dialysis dose and protein catabolism. The precision of each equation was tested with Cpre Cpost data obtained from steady state simulations of 540 patients without residual renal clearance (KR) and 972 simulated patients with significant residual KR. The simplest equation has the form: [formula: see text] where V is urea distribution volume and a and d are constants varying with session of the week. When compared to nPCR values calculated from formal urea kinetic modeling, the error determined with this formula never exceeded 5% for the midweek or final session. A more complicated equation of the form: [formula: see text] provided nPCR estimates with a maximum error < 1.3% for any dialysis session of the week and for KR up to 4 ml/min for a 70-kg patient. The only data required for the latter equation are Cpre, Cpost, length of dialysis session, volume ultrafiltered (delta BW), and an approximate value of the patient's urea distribution volume. The proposed equations permit nPCR to be calculated simply and accurately for stable patients dialyzed three times a week.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1995

Dialysate-based kinetic modeling.

The focus of this review article is urea kinetic modeling based on the exploitation of concentration measurements in the spent dialysate stream. After a review of blood-based urea kinetic modeling, dialysate-based techniques are considered, beginning with dialysate collection techniques and their associated urea kinetic modeling equations. Partial dialysate collection methods and equations for the determination of protein catabolic rate based on a 7-day mass balance period are explored next. This is followed by a description of urea sensors and their application for dialysate-based modeling including the determination of protein catabolic rate, predialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and KT/V. How the output of a urea sensor may allow the detection of significant changes in patient clearance during the course of dialysis is illustrated, as well as how double-pool urea kinetics may be accounted for in KT/V determination. Routine determination of patient lean body mass using creatinine kinetic modeling based on partial dialysate collection or a dialysate-based creatinine concentration sensor is demonstrated. Finally, the potential for complete automation of urea kinetic modeling in dialysis machines of the future is explored.

Blood Urea Nitrogen↗
PubMed1995

Creatinine kinetic modelling: a simple and reliable tool for the assessment of protein nutritional status in haemodialysis patients.

While the mathematical modelling of urea kinetics is in wide use for evaluating treatment adequacy and protein nutrition in dialysis patients, the kinetics of creatinine generation in dialysis patients has been relatively unexplored. In this study creatinine kinetic modelling as a clinical tool was investigated in a group of 90 patients treated by haemodialysis (n = 20), haemodiafiltration (60), haemofiltration (7), or biofiltration (3) over a 6-36-month period. A single pool model of creatinine kinetics was employed to obtain monthly values of creatinine distribution space and creatinine appearance rate. Extrarenal creatinine degradation rate, estimated using a clearance of 0.038 l/kg/24 h as suggested by Mitch and co-workers, was added to creatinine appearance rate in urine and dialysate to calculate a corrected creatinine index (CI). Extrarenal degradation accounted for 12 +/- 2% of CI. CI was higher in males (22.4 +/- 4.5 mg/kg/24 h) than females (19.8 +/- 4.8) and decreased with age, falling off more sharply for the female group (CI = 29.9-0.185.age, R = 0.72) than the males (CI = 24.1-0.030.age, R = 0.31). CI was found to correlate strongly with protein catabolic rate determined by urea kinetic modelling (CI = 8.84 +/- 10.91.PCR). Low or reduced CI was associated in this study group with severe malnutrition status and high mortality rate. CI is suggested as a strong predictor of patient morbidity and mortality.

Creatinine↗
PubMed1992

KT/V and protein catabolic rate determination from serial urea measurement in the dialysate effluent stream.

A bloodless technique of evaluating protein catabolic rate (PCR) and KT/V (K, clearance; T, dialysis time; V, urea distribution volume) in hemodialysis patients is presented based on serial measurement of urea in the dialysate effluent stream. PCR follows from equating urea generation and urea removal over a 7 day cycle, changes in body stores being comparatively negligible: PCR = 0.026 [U1 + U2 + U3]/BWdry + 0.17, where U1 is the amount of urea in mmol appearing in the dialysate for each session in the 7 day period. KT/V is obtained from the slope of the natural logarithm of spent dialysate urea concentration-time plot: KT/V = [- slope.T + 3.delta BW/BWdry]/[1 - 0.01786.T(hr], where delta BW = amount ultrafiltered in liters. The dialysate-based approach was validated and compared with conventional urea kinetic modeling (UKM) for 17 patients studied for three consecutive dialyses. The dialysate-based and UKM values of PCR agreed well when in vivo clearance values based on total dialysate collection were used for UKM. KT/V values agreed poorly on a session-by-session basis but were nearly equivalent when averaged for the three dialyses of the week. These findings lay the foundation for UKM automation with a urea sensor in the effluent dialysate stream.

Female↗
PubMed1991

[Urea kinetic model analysis in dialysis: from theory to practice].

Urea kinetic modeling (UKM) has been originally proposed by F. Gotch and J. Sargent as a guide to optimize and individualize the dialysis prescription in uremic patients. In a recent report, the US National Cooperative Dialysis Study group, showed the power of this approach compared to conventional methods. It was also concluded that dialysis adequacy could be predicted with a high success rate by determining three parameters; uremia represented by the Urea Time Averaged Concentration, dialysis dose defined as KT/V ratio, and dietary protein intake calculated from the urea generation rate. In spite of its potential usefulness, UKM has not gained clinical acceptance among nephrologists since it appeared always complicated due to its mathematical formulation or cumbersome to be used routinely in dialyzed patients. In this paper the authors will bring the reader from basic concepts to practical use of UKM to guide dialysis strategy. Limits of validity and difficulty in using this approach are also discussed. It is concluded that UKM by using very simple and basic parameters is a practical, and very powerful tool for assessing the dialysis adequacy and nutritional status of dialyzed patients. Direct quantification from dialysate (or ultrafiltrate) collection appeared a simple and precise method which should avoided multiple blood sampling.

Humans↗
PubMed1990

Recombinant human erythropoietin: 18 months' experience in hemodialysis patients.

It has been shown that the regular administration of erythropoietin (EPO) permits the correction of anemia in end-stage renal failure patients. We analyzed the effect of chronic administration of EPO in 13 stable, regularly dialyzed end-stage renal failure patients over an 18-month period. The effects of EPO were evaluated according to standard criteria including clinical status, blood pressure control, hematology and biochemistry data, protein nutritional status, and dialysis efficiency. Following a 2-week control period, EPO was administered intravenously (IV) after the dialysis session according to a two-phase protocol. The first period (correction phase) consisted of a stepwise EPO dose increment, starting at 3 x 24 IU/kg/wk and doubling the dose every 14 days according to hemoglobin response in order to achieve a target hemoglobin level of approximately 11.0 g/dL (110 g/L). In the second period (maintenance phase) EPO dose was optimized to maintain the hemoglobin level between 100 and 110 g/L (10.0 and 11.0 g/dL), by adjusting either the unit dose or the frequency of injection. Anemia was corrected in all patients within 11 weeks, with EPO dose increasing from 72 to 360 IU/kg/wk. The stabilization of hemoglobin was achieved with an average EPO dose of 275 IU/kg/wk (50 to 476 IU/kg/wk). Concomitantly, a subjective and clinical improvement was noted in all patients. The dialysis efficacy remained in an acceptable range throughout the study, falling significantly (approximately 10%) through the first 3 months of treatment to stabilize at an effective urea clearance of approximately 120 L/wk. The dietary protein intake calculated from urea kinetic modeling ranged between 1.1 and 1.2 g/kg/d.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Effect of reuse on dialyzer efficacy.

The effect of reuse on dialyzer efficacy was examined by measuring blood compartment volume and dialyzer mass transfer coefficient (maximum dialyzer clearance) as a function of dialyzer use number. The 102 polysulfone dialyzers tested (F60 and HF80, Fresenius) were reprocessed on Renatron machines using peroxyacetic acid as the dual cleansing and sterilizing agent. Each dialyzer was used an average of 14.4 +/- 5.7SD times and was tested once (twice for 13/102 dialyzers) during a routine dialysis session at an arbitrary use number (7.6 +/- 5.3; range 1 to 24). The parameters tested were found to decrease only marginally with reuse, corresponding to a blood compartment volume loss of approximately 1% (R = 0.04) over a 5-week/15-use period and a decrease in dialyzer mass transfer coefficient of approximately 3% (R = 0.07 and 0.06) over the same period for urea and creatinine, respectively. It was concluded that the loss in dialyzer efficacy is negligible over the average use period of almost 5 weeks per dialyzer.

Blood Volume↗
PubMed1990

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of a postdilutional hemofiltration system with in-line production of substitution fluid.

Safety and efficacy of a recently developed hemofiltration (HF) system with in-line production of substitution fluid (GHS-10; Gambro, Lund, Sweden) based on a sterilizing filtration of acetate buffered dialysate has been evaluated in 4 patients over a 6-month period. Two patients were prematurely excluded from the study: 1 because of acetate intolerance and the other because of kidney transplantation. Two patients completed the study (240 HF sessions). Treatment adequacy was maintained in the 2 medium term treated patients according to the usual clinical and biochemical criteria and a mean exchange volume of 100-105 liters/week (30-35 liters/session three times weekly). Urea kinetic modeling analysis performed over all HF cycles gave the following results: dialysis index (urea clearance.time-on HF/urea volume space) (KT/V) approximately 1-1.1, urea time averaged concentration (UREA TAC) approximately 15-20 mmol/l, and protein catabolic rate (PCR) approximately 1.1-1.2 g/kg/day. Rare clinical adverse symptoms observed during the course of sessions were attributed to acetate intolerance. Microbiological safety was confirmed in vivo by the absence of pyrogenic reactions after 240 HF sessions (approximately 7 m3 substitution fluid infused intravenously) and in vitro by the constant absence of bacteria and/or endotoxin content limulus amaebocyte lysate (LAL) sensibility threshold 10 pg/l within the infusate produced during the sham HF sessions. The fluid mass balance obtained with the GHS-10 monitor was excellent. The electrolyte composition as judged by Na variation remained in a range of 2-3%. GHS-10 used in this study for postdilutional HF confirms that a large quantity of intravenous quality fluid may be safely produced by ultrafiltration from dialysate. It also introduced a new dimension in biocompatibility of dialysis by demonstrating that sterile dialysate may be routinely produced and used for routine dialysis.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Erythropoietin-induced changes in protein nutrition: quantitative assessment by urea kinetic modeling analysis.

To evaluate objectively the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) administration on nutritional status in stable dialyzed patients, we used urea kinetic modeling (UKM) analysis and dietary protein intake evaluation by dietary assessment. Fifteen patients (9 females, 6 males; mean age 46.9 +/- 15.6 years) dialyzed for 9.4 +/- 6.3 years were studied longitudinally for 18 months, consisting of a control period (6 months) and an rHuEPO treatment period (12 months). Treatment modalities based on 3 weekly sessions were hemodialysis in 12 patients (6 cuprophane, 3 cellulose acetate and 3 highly permeable membranes), hemodiafiltration in 2 patients and postdilutional hemofiltration in 1 patient. Bicarbonate buffered dialysate was used in 9 patients and acetate in 6 patients. Urea kinetic modeling using a single-pool model was performed monthly over 1-3 cycles. rHuEPO was administered intravenously at the end of dialysis according to a two-phase protocol: (1) correction of anemia by stepwise increment of rHuEPO dose, and (2) maintenance dose to keep hemoglobin at 10-11 g/dl. rHuEPO administration corrected anemia in all patients, improving their general clinical condition. Dialysis efficacy was significantly reduced (15%) after the 3rd month of rHuEPO therapy. Clearnces were restored by increasing dialysis time and/or improving dialyzer performances, and adequacy of dialysis was maintained in all patients. During the 12 months of rHuEPO therapy, the protein catabolic rate remained stable at 1.2 g/kg/24 h in spite of an increase in appetite. At the same time, dry body weight increased significantly after 9 months, and the ratio dietary protein intake/protein catabolic rate a gross estimation of nitrogen balance, increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Germicidal effectiveness of Dialox, a new stable peroxyacetic acid solution, in the re-use of high-flux dialysers.

In this study we evaluate the effectiveness of a newly available peroxyacetic acid solution (Dialox) as a disinfecting agent in the re-use of highly permeable dialysers. The germicidal properties of Dialox were tested in an in vitro trial on previously used haemodiafilters (HF80, Fresenius) highly contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium smegmatis or sporulated Bacillus cereus. Complete freedom from bacterial contamination was observed 5 min after the reprocessing treatment on a Renatron reprocessing machine, using the currently marketed Dialox concentrate.

Acetates↗
PubMed1989

Urea kinetic modelling by partial dialysate collection.

Conventional urea kinetic modelling (UKM) has several drawbacks, in particular the complexity of the required calculations and the need for accurate values of parameters which are difficult to measure, such as dialyzer clearance and blood flow. An alternative method of UKM is proposed based on collecting a small fraction of spent dialysate flow for 3 consecutive dialyses. Application of a urea mass balance to the 7 day period permits neglecting changes in body urea stores. Thus no blood sampling is required for most patients. The required calculations are simple and straightforward. The partial dialysate collection (PDC) method was compared to conventional UKM in a 3 patient, 15 week study. Protein catabolic rate (PCR) from PDC was a smooth curve and consistent with dietary estimation for each patient. Conventional UKM gave variable PCR results which were 17-27% higher on average. This discrepancy was attributed to overestimation of dialyzer clearance. PDC was concluded to be more convenient and accurate than conventional UKM and therefore ideal for routine clinical use.

Adult↗