PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

L J Jensen

Publications and source records attributed to L J Jensen.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Thromboprophylaxis in patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomized, comparative study between Org 10172 and dextran 70.

A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind trial has been undertaken to compare the thromboprophylactic effect and safety of the heparinoid Org 10172 (a mixture of low molecular-weight sulfated glycosaminoglycuronides) and dextran 70 in patients operated on for hip fracture. Prestudy biostatistical calculations led to the need for 260 patients. Three hundred eight patients were randomized and 19 were excluded after randomization, the majority because of postponed surgery. Analyses were made on the 289 patients on an intention-to-treat basis, as well as on the 247 patients given correct prophylaxis. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was based on bilateral ascending phlebography on postoperative days 10 through 12. The frequency of deep vein thrombosis on an intention-to-treat basis was 10% in the Org 10172 group and 30% in the dextran 70 group and, on the basis of correct prophylaxis, 12% and 31%, respectively, both differences being significant (p less than 0.001). Two-month mortality rates were equal in the groups. Three fatal pulmonary emboli were seen in the dextran group. Significantly more patients in the dextran group received postoperative transfusions; no other differences in various hemorrhagic parameters were seen. Thus it can be concluded that Org 10172 has a significantly better thromboprophylactic effect than does dextran in patients with hip fractures without significant side effects.

Aged

Prophylactic vancomycin versus placebo in arterial prosthetic reconstructions.

Vascular reconstructive surgery with the placement of prosthetic material caudal to the diaphragm is occasionally associated with postoperative wound infection. These infections often lead to amputation and can be lethal. Only a few published reports contain information on the value of prophylactic antibiotic treatment with these operations, but its use is common throughout the world. To investigate this problem, a prospective, double blind, randomized study of vancomycin versus placebo in 128 vascular graft operations caudal to the diaphragm was conducted from June, 1982 to July, 1984. The difference in infection rate was significant (2 p = 0.0008) in favor of the vancomycin group. Fourteen wound infections (21.2%) were found in the placebo group, 3 of which (4.5%) were prosthesis infections. Among the 62 vancomycin-treated patients, one case of superficial wound infection (1.6%) and no cases of prosthesis infection were found. The most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. The study has demonstrated that vancomycin, a narrow spectrum antibiotic, in an ultra-short regimen (one gram one hour before surgery and one gram 4 hours later) is an effective prophylactic agent against postoperative wound infection. Temporary and, in most cases, doses-related side effects were seen in 7.9% of the patients treated with vancomycin.

Arteries

Prosthetic graft infections: a review of 720 arterial prosthetic reconstructions.

Six-hundred-and-three patients who underwent 720 vascular prosthetic graft operations caudal to the diaphragm were studied retrospectively. Wound complications appeared in 99 patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were not used. Serous secretion was found after 27 arterial graft procedures (3.8%), superficial wound infection after 41 (5.7%), and prosthetic graft infection after 31 (4.3%). Of the 31 patients with prosthetic graft infection, 10 recovered (32%). Four of these patients recovered after removal of the Staphylococcus aureus-infected prosthesis. Three received a replacement prosthesis with systemic antibiotic treatment and closed antibiotic irrigation, and one patient's prosthesis was replaced with an autologous vein graft with antibiotic treatment. Twelve patients (39%) underwent amputation and 9 died. The frequency of graft occlusion was greater when the prosthesis was infected with Staphylococcus aureus than with other microorganisms. The aggressive approach used in the 4 above-mentioned cases could be a treatment modality in prosthetic graft infection with Staphylococcus aureus, especially because of the high incidence of graft occlusion associated with these microorganisms.

Amputation, Surgical