PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

L J Riley

Publications and source records attributed to L J Riley.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Natriuretic effect of calcium-channel blockers in hypertensives.

This double-blind, randomized, crossover trial characterizes the acute natriuretic response to calcium-channel blockers (CCB) and investigates the role of hemodynamic and hormonal factors in mediating the natriuresis. Thirteen male subjects with essential hypertension received a single oral 20-mg dose of nifedipine or 120 mg of diltiazem. Renal functional and hemodynamic measurements were performed prior to and hourly for 4 hours following medication. Subjects then received these medications for 4 weeks at which time the above studies were repeated. Urinary sodium excretion increased within 60 minutes of CCB administration and the natriuresis was sustained for 4 hours. Cumulative sodium loss during the 4 hours of study was greater with nifedipine (43 +/- 12 mmol) than with diltiazem (18 +/- 6 mmol) (P less than 0.05). Despite natriuresis, urinary potassium excretion was decreased by both agents. Even though both drugs decreased the mean arterial pressure, inulin and paraaminohippurate (PAH) clearances were not altered. Plasma aldosterone concentrations decreased, plasma catecholamine concentrations increased, whereas plasma-renin activity was unchanged with both drugs. Body weight, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow, plasma-renin activity, plasma aldosterone, and catecholamine concentrations were unchanged following 4 weeks of therapy. The acute natriuretic response after 4 weeks of therapy was similar to the response noted after the first dose. This study concludes that CCB are acutely natriuretic. Despite systemic hypotension, renal hemodynamics are unaltered during CCB therapy. Suppression of aldosterone as well as direct tubular effects of these drugs may mediate the natriuresis. Chronic therapy with CCB does not modify the acute natriuretic response to these agents.

Adult

Acute metabolic acid-base disorders.

Metabolic acid-base disturbances commonly and predictably complicate the course of many intensive care unit patients and plague the intensivists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists beset with the task of caring for them. In this article, we offer a systematic approach to the patient with the metabolic acid-base disorders that are likely to be encountered in the setting of the intensive care unit. The discussions are in no way presented as through treatments of all metabolic disorders, but rather focus on the more practical aspects, namely, clinical scenarios, diagnostic clues, and therapeutic goals. Additionally, we interject a discussion of some of the more controversial topics with regard to the therapy of metabolic disorders.

Acid-Base Equilibrium

Crossover comparison of captopril and propranolol as step 2 agents in hypertension.

The efficacy of captopril treatment was compared with that of propranolol in a single-blind crossover study in 14 patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled on diuretic alone. Both captopril (37.5 to 75 mg daily) and propranolol (60 to 120 mg daily), in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg daily), caused a significant fall in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Heart rate, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone data were consistent with the effects of converting enzyme inhibition or beta blockade. Both drugs were well tolerated. Captopril appeared to be equivalent in efficacy and safety to propranolol when added to hydrochlorothiazide. It may be considered as an alternative step 2 antihypertensive agent, especially in patients experiencing unwanted effects on beta blockers.

Adult

Sulindac and ibuprofen inhibit furosemide-stimulated renin release but not natriuresis in men on a normal sodium diet.

We compared the effect of two commonly prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ibuprofen and sulindac, and placebo on intravenous furosemide-induced natriuresis and renin stimulation in 11 healthy male volunteers, consuming a 100 mEq sodium, 80 mEq potassium diet. Chronic (6-day) therapy with each agent was followed by a 1-week washout period. There were no significant treatment-related differences in either urine volume or sodium excretion for any of the designated collection periods or for the cumulative value for the 4 h after furosemide administration. Similarly, differences among groups were not observed for creatinine clearance, urinary potassium and urinary chloride excretion. Mean basal plasma renin activity levels prior to furosemide administration on day 6 were significantly lower in the presence of ibuprofen (1.5 +/- 2.0 ng/ml/h;p less than 0.01) and sulindac (2,3 +/- 0.9 ng/ml/h; p less than 0.05), compared with placebo (3.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml/h); the difference between the two NSAIDs was also significant (p less than 0.05). Mean plasma renin activity levels in the 4 h after furosemide increased significantly at all time points in comparison to basal values, but were significantly less for ibuprofen and sulindac groups in the first hour. Our data suggest that the natriuresis following intravenous furosemide in men consuming a normal sodium intake is not prostaglandin-dependent. Furthermore, the observation that sulindac suppressed basal and stimulated plasma renin activity levels, albeit to a lesser extent than ibuprofen, questions the claim that sulindac "spares' the kidney and compels further evaluation of this issue.

Adult

A dose-titration trial of guanadrel as step-two therapy in essential hypertension.

The efficacy and safety of low-dose guanadrel sulfate were evaluated in 20 patients with essential hypertension based on seated diastolic blood pressures (SDBP) ranging from 95 to 115 mm Hg despite a trial dosage of hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg/d for up to five weeks. These patients had been resistant to, or intolerant of, one or more step-two antihypertensive drugs in the past (i.e., methyldopa, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, clonidine, or prazosin). The majority of patients demonstrated a satisfactory response (SDBP 95 mm Hg or reduction in SDBP of 10 mm Hg) to guanadrel. Nine patients responded at a low dosage, 10 to 20 mg/d and remained free from adverse effects throughout the study (up to 12 weeks of treatment). Of the remaining 11 patients titrated to higher dosages of guanadrel (30 to 60 mg/d), three had no discernible response while six developed adverse effects. The results of the study suggest that guanadrel has an acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio only when used in low dosages (10 to 30 mg/d) and may be successfully employed as step-two antihypertensive therapy in patients resistant to, or intolerant of, other step-two agents.

Adult