PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Knopf

Publications and source records attributed to L Knopf.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1989

Ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers: test of two-wave hypothesis by ultrasonically monitoring individual follicles.

The two-wave hypothesis for follicular development during the bovine estrous cycle was tested by ultrasonically monitoring individual follicles in 10 heifers during an interovulatory interval. A dominant follicle was defined as one that reached a diameter of at least 11 mm. Subordinate follicles were defined as those that appeared to originate from the same follicular pool as a dominant follicle. A dominant follicle and its cohorts were defined as a wave. Two waves during an interovulatory interval were identified in 9 of 10 heifers. The first wave was first identified, retrospectively, on a mean of Day 0.2 +/- 0.1 (ovulation = Day 0) and gave origin to a dominant anovulatory follicle and a mean of 1.4 +/- 0.3 identified subordinates. The dominant follicle reached maximum diameter (mean, 15.8 +/- 0.8 mm) on an average of Day 7 and then decreased (P less than .04) by Day 11. The subordinate follicles increased in diameter for a few days and then regressed. The second wave was first identified on a mean of Day 10.0 +/- 0.4 and gave origin to the ovulatory follicle and a mean of 0.9 +/- 0.3 subordinates. One of the 10 heifers had 3 waves of follicular activity characterized by an anovulatory wave emerging on Day 0, another anovulatory wave emerging on Day 10, and an ovulatory wave emerging on Day 16. Results strongly supported the two-wave hypothesis but also indicated that a minority of interovulatory intervals in this heifer population may have 3 waves of follicular activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers during early pregnancy.

Daily ultrasonic monitoring of individual follicles was used to compare follicular wave characteristics of nonbred (n = 6) and pregnant heifers (n = 6). The dominant follicle of the first wave (Wave 1) did not differ significantly between reproductive statuses for any endpoint. The dominant follicle of Wave 2 was the ovulatory follicle in all nonbred heifers. The maximum diameter of the dominant follicle of Wave 2 was greater (p less than 0.05) for the nonbred heifers (14.8 mm) than for the pregnant heifers (13.0 mm). The dominant follicle of Wave 3 was detected later (p less than 0.003; Day 19.7 vs. Day 17.3) and reached a greater diameter (p less than 0.05; 16.6 mm vs. 12.0 mm) in the nonbred than in the pregnant heifers. On the mean day of onset of luteolysis (Day 15.2) in the nonbred heifers, the dominant follicle was similar in diameter for the two groups. Within a few days, the follicle began to regress in the pregnant heifers but maintained or increased in diameter in the nonbred heifers so that a greater maximum diameter was attained. During Days 0 70 of pregnancy, the interval from emergence of a wave to the emergence of the next wave was constant (not significantly different; mean intervals, 8.5 9.8 days). The mean maximum diameter attained by the dominant follicles differed significantly among the first 6 follicular waves; diameter was greatest for Wave 1 (15.7 mm), smallest for Waves 2 (13.1 mm) and 3 (12.6 mm), and intermediate for Waves 4 (14.0 mm), 5 (13.7 mm), and 6 (14.5 mm).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves.

For 18 two-wave interovulatory intervals in heifers, the follicular waves were first detected on Days -0.2 +/- 0.1 and 9.6 +/- 0.2, and for 4 three-wave intervals on Days -0.5 +/- 0.3, 9.0 +/- 0.0 and 16.0 +/- 1.1 (ovulation is Day 0). The day-to-day mean diameter profile of the dominant follicle of the 1st wave and the day of emergence of the 2nd wave were not significantly different between 2-wave and 3-wave intervals. There were no indications, therefore, that events occurring during the first half of the interovulatory interval were associated with the later emergence of a 3rd wave. The dominant ovulatory follicle differed significantly (P less than 0.05 at least) between 2-wave and 3-wave intervals in day of emergence (Day 9.6 +/- 0.2 and 16.0 +/- 1.1), length of interval from emergence of follicle to ovulation (10.9 +/- 0.4 and 6.8 +/- 0.6 days), and diameter on day before ovulation (16.5 +/- 0.4 and 13.9 +/- 0.4 mm). The mean length of 2-wave interovulatory intervals (20.4 +/- 0.3 days) was shorter (P less than 0.01) than for 3-wave intervals (22.8 +/- 0.6 days). The mean day of luteal regression for 2-wave and 3-wave intervals was 16.5 +/- 0.4 and 19.2 +/- 0.5 (P less than 0.01). For all intervals, luteal regression occurred after emergence of the ovulatory wave, and the next wave did not emerge until near the day of ovulation at the onset of the subsequent interovulatory interval. In conclusion, the emergence of a 3rd wave was associated with a longer luteal phase, and the viable dominant follicle present at the time of luteolysis became the ovulatory follicle.

Animals↗