PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L L Habets

Publications and source records attributed to L L Habets.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The recognition of craniomandibular disorders--a comparison between clinical, tomographical, and dental panoramic radiographical findings in thirty-one subjects.

A comparison between clinical, tomographical, and dental panoramic radiographical findings was made in thirty-one female patients suffering from craniomandibular disorders (CMD). In general it was found that condylar sclerosis was more common in these patients than in earlier studies. After clinical separation of the material into two groups based upon the origin of pain, myogenous versus arthrogenous, no radiographical confirmation of the differential diagnostics could be made. Regarding vertical condylar asymmetry measured on the Orthopantomogram, it was found that 74% of the patients with CMD had more than the 3% of asymmetry regarded as within normal limits. It seems that with an increasing severity of the disorder the level of condylar asymmetry appears less. If the interpretation of the findings is correct its conclusion might lead to the recognition of a morphological factor which could contribute to the development of a craniomandibular disorder.

Adolescent↗

The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. I. The factor of vertical magnification.

As an orthopantomogram provides bilateral information, it seems to be an efficient tool for screening for arthropathy of craniomandibular disorders. An experimental model was designed and constructed to resemble a human mandible. By changing the position of the model in the horizontal plane of the orthopantomograph, nine different images were analysed for changes of vertical magnifications. Emphasis was put on large parts of the mandible like the condyle. In positions that had been altered less than 10 mm from the originally centred position of the mandible in the orthopantomograph, vertical differences between the left and right sides were less than 6%. Observed condylar asymmetries within a 6% difference might, therefore, be due to technical failures.

Humans↗