PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L L Kim

Publications and source records attributed to L L Kim.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Predicting quantitative trait levels by modeling SNP interaction.

Predicting phenotype from genotype is difficult when the phenotype is affected by a gene with numerous weakly penetrant alleles that differ only in the pattern of their single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). While it is probable that SNP interactions affect phenotype, to our knowledge no one has determined the most effective way of evaluating whether SNPs interact and of modeling the interaction. Therefore, to explore this issue, we investigate here three methods of modeling SNP interaction using data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 12. Since major gene 5 (MG5) has sequence information and explains 37% of the variation in quantitative trait 5 (Q5), we focus on using SNPs within MG5 to predict Q5 among individuals who married into the pedigree. As a preliminary screening step, we reduced the number of SNPs from 269 to 34 based on their association with Q5. In our first models we assumed that SNPs affected Q5 in a simple additive manner. These models explained 34% and 15% of the variation in Q5 in women and men, respectively. Our second model was a linear model, which used individual SNPs and simple interaction terms as predictors. These models explained 36% and 16% of the variation in Q5 levels for women and men, respectively. Our last model was a "hit"-based model which was motivated by the hypothesis that disequilibrium between SNPs may reflect the fact that SNPs affect phenotype by acting in concert with other SNPs within their "disequilibrium set." Thus, the number of hits within the disequilibrium sets were used as predictors. These models explained 35% and 19% of the variation in Q5 for women and men, respectively. Our results suggest that phenotype can be predicted from complex patterns of weakly penetrant SNPs using relatively simple models. We concluded that SNP interaction either was not included in the simulation model, or had only a weak impact on Q5 levels.

Female↗

Hierarchical modeling of the relation between sequence variants and a quantitative trait: addressing multiple comparison and population stratification issues.

When analyzing the relation between genetic sequence information and disease traits, false-positive associations can arise due to multiple comparisons and population stratification. In an attempt to address these issues, we incorporate into a conventional analytic model higher-level--or "prior"--models that use additional information to improve estimates while allowing for differing population structures. We apply this hierarchical model to simulated data from the Genetic Analysis Workshop 12. We focus on the effects of common candidate gene sequence variants on quantitative risk factor 5 (Q5) levels. In particular, we compare the regression coefficients (and 95% confidence intervals) obtained from conventional (one-stage) analyses versus the corresponding results from the hierarchical analyses. When examining either the marry-ins or all subjects in the general and isolate populations, the conventional model detected numerous sites in candidate genes 1-5 and 7 that had statistically significant regression coefficients (alpha level = 0.05). In contrast, our hierarchical model primarily only detected associations for variants in candidate gene 2, which is the casual gene for Q5.

Chromosome Mapping↗

Multilevel modeling in epidemiology with GLIMMIX.

Previous work has shown that multilevel modeling can be a valuable technique for epidemiologic analysis. The complexity of using this approach, however, continues to restrict its general application. A critical factor is the lack of flexible and appropriate software for multilevel modeling. SAS provides a macro, GLIMMIX, that can be used for multilevel modeling, but that is not sufficient for a complete epidemiologic analysis. We here provide additional code to obtain epidemiologic output from GLIMMIX, illustrated with new data on diet and breast cancer from the European Community Multicenter Study on Antioxidants, Myocardial Infarction, and Breast Cancer (EURAMIC). Our results give epidemiologists an easily used tool for fitting multilevel models.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Software for hierarchical modeling of epidemiologic data.

Hierarchical models can provide more reasonable and stable parameter estimates than conventional analytical approaches. This technique also deals with problems of multiple comparisons and allows one to model multilevel data within a hierarchical framework. Hence, one would anticipate a surge in applying hierarchical models to epidemiologic data. Difficulties in fitting hierarchical models, however, seem to have limited their use. To help address this problem, we describe the existing software packages that one can use to fit hierarchical models. Since these packages have limited familiarity and applicability in epidemiology, we also present SAS code for analyzing epidemiologic data with hierarchical models. These results allow epidemiologists to fit hierarchical models with readily available software.

Breast Neoplasms↗