PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L L Leape

Publications and source records attributed to L L Leape.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

The economic consequences of medical injuries. Implications for a no-fault insurance plan.

BACKGROUND: There has been little research into the actual economic consequences of medical injuries. This inhibits informed discussion of alternatives to malpractice litigation. For example, the cost of no-fault medical accident insurance has been thought to be prohibitive. METHOD: As part of a comprehensive analysis of medical injury and litigation, we interviewed a random sample of 794 individuals who had suffered medical adverse events in New York hospitals in 1984 and used their responses to calculate the cost of injuries. We then estimated the costs of a simulated no-fault insurance program that would operate as a second payer to direct insurance sources and would compensate for all financial losses attributed to medical injury. RESULTS: The estimated costs that would be paid by a simulated no-fault program were $161 million for medical care, $276 million for lost wages, and $441 million in lost household production, or a total of $878 million in 1989 dollars for the cohort of patients who were injured in 1984. CONCLUSION: Although our estimate does not include administrative costs, it nonetheless indicates that a no-fault program would not be notably costlier than the more than $1 billion New York physicians now spend annually on malpractice insurance.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Small-group judgment methods for determining resource-based relative values.

National telephone surveys used in the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale Study produce reliable and valid relative values of work, but phone surveys are expensive and time consuming. We evaluated three small-group processes as alternatives. We compared national survey work estimates for 38 surgical services to those generated by panels of 11 and 19 highly qualified general surgeons using 1) single-round mail survey; 2) Delphi multiple-round ratings; and 3) modified Delphi with face-to-face discussion. Single-round mail-survey ratings were closest to the national survey; average differences were 11.0% and 12.6%. Delphi feedback led to increased differences: typical values differed by 14.6% and 15.2%. Face-to-face discussion led to still further divergence (21.0%). Single-round mail survey of a small number of experts provides relative work values that compare more favorably to those of the national survey than those obtained from Delphi multiple-round ratings or modified Delphi with face-to-face discussion.

Data Collection↗
PubMed1992

Unnecessary surgery.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed1992

Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition.

The current interest in the development of practice guidelines raises an important question about the effect of expert panel composition on the outcome of the guideline development process. We compared the ratings of appropriateness of indications for carotid endarterectomy produced by two panels: an all-surgical panel and a "balanced" panel composed of four surgeons, two neurologists, and one specialist each from family practice, internal medicine, and radiology. We then compared the effect of the two sets of ratings when used to evaluate 1302 patients who had undergone carotid endarterectomy. The all-surgical panel found more indications "appropriate" (24 versus 14%) and fewer indications "inappropriate" (61 versus 70%) than the balanced panel (p less than 0.01). The all-surgical panel also more often reached agreement. When ratings were applied to patients, 70% were appropriate by the all-surgical criteria versus 38% by the balanced panel, while 19% of the operations were inappropriate by all-surgical criteria, versus 31% by the balanced panel ratings. However, the percentage of procedures judged "inappropriate with agreement" was 15% for all-surgical and 16% for the balanced panel. We conclude that the all-surgical panel was more likely to favor operative treatment for carotid disease than the multispecialty panel, but that concensus judgments of inappropriateness by the two panels were very similar.

Arteriosclerosis↗
PubMed1991

Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care.

To explore the epidemiology of adverse events (AEs), which were defined as injuries due to medical treatment, and that subset of AEs caused by negligence, we studied interhospital variation in these outcomes in a sample of 31,000 medical records drawn from a random selection of 51 hospitals in New York in 1984. We found a substantial variation in both AE rates (0.2% to 7.9%; mean, 3.2%) and the percentage of AEs due to negligence (1% to 60%; mean, 24.9%) among hospitals. Univariate analyses of AEs revealed that primary teaching institutions had significantly higher rates (4.1%) and rural hospitals had significantly lower ones (1.0%). The percentage of AEs due to negligence was lower in primary teaching (10.7%) and for-profit (9.5%) hospitals and was significantly higher in hospitals with predominantly (greater than 80%) minority patients who had been discharged (37%). These findings were corroborated by multivariate analysis. Our results suggest that AEs and negligence are not randomly distributed and that certain types of hospitals have significantly higher rates of injuries due to substandard care. These observations may represent an important improvement on existing measures of quality because they take into account the fact that some hospitals' populations may be at risk of suffering a poor outcome.

Hospital Records↗
PubMed1991

Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I.

BACKGROUND: As part of an interdisciplinary study of medical injury and malpractice litigation, we estimated the incidence of adverse events, defined as injuries caused by medical management, and of the subgroup of such injuries that resulted from negligent or substandard care. METHODS: We reviewed 30,121 randomly selected records from 51 randomly selected acute care, nonpsychiatric hospitals in New York State in 1984. We then developed population estimates of injuries and computed rates according to the age and sex of the patients as well as the specialties of the physicians. RESULTS: Adverse events occurred in 3.7 percent of the hospitalizations (95 percent confidence interval, 3.2 to 4.2), and 27.6 percent of the adverse events were due to negligence (95 percent confidence interval, 22.5 to 32.6). Although 70.5 percent of the adverse events gave rise to disability lasting less than six months, 2.6 percent caused permanently disabling injuries and 13.6 percent led to death. The percentage of adverse events attributable to negligence increased in the categories of more severe injuries (Wald test chi 2 = 21.04, P less than 0.0001). Using weighted totals, we estimated that among the 2,671,863 patients discharged from New York hospitals in 1984 there were 98,609 adverse events and 27,179 adverse events involving negligence. Rates of adverse events rose with age (P less than 0.0001). The percentage of adverse events due to negligence was markedly higher among the elderly (P less than 0.01). There were significant differences in rates of adverse events among categories of clinical specialties (P less than 0.0001), but no differences in the percentage due to negligence. CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial amount of injury to patients from medical management, and many injuries are the result of substandard care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.

BACKGROUND: In a sample of 30,195 randomly selected hospital records, we identified 1133 patients (3.7 percent) with disabling injuries caused by medical treatment. We report here an analysis of these adverse events and their relation to error, negligence, and disability. METHODS: Two physician-reviewers independently identified the adverse events and evaluated them with respect to negligence, errors in management, and extent of disability. One of the authors classified each event according to type of injury. We tested the significance of differences in rates of negligence and disability among categories with at least 30 adverse events. RESULTS: Drug complications were the most common type of adverse event (19 percent), followed by wound infections (14 percent) and technical complications (13 percent). Nearly half the adverse events (48 percent) were associated with an operation. Adverse events during surgery were less likely to be caused by negligence (17 percent) than nonsurgical ones (37 percent). The proportion of adverse events due to negligence was highest for diagnostic mishaps (75 percent), noninvasive therapeutic mishaps ("errors of omission") (77 percent), and events occurring in the emergency room (70 percent). Errors in management were identified for 58 percent of the adverse events, among which nearly half were attributed to negligence. CONCLUSIONS: Although the prevention of many adverse events must await improvements in medical knowledge, the high proportion that are due to management errors suggests that many others are potentially preventable now. Reducing the incidence of these events will require identifying their causes and developing methods to prevent error or reduce its effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services?

We studied the relationship of the appropriateness of the use of coronary angiography, carotid endarterectomy, and upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy to their rates of use in 23 adjacent counties in one state. We measured appropriateness by means of a detailed review of the medical records of Medicare beneficiaries who had the procedures performed in 1981, using present criteria derived by an expert panel. Use rates per 10,000 Medicare enrollees in a county varied from 13 to 158 for coronary angiography, 5 to 41 for carotid endarterectomy, and 42 to 164 for upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy. Inappropriate use varied by county from 8% to 75% for coronary angiography, from 0% to 67% for carotid endarterectomy, and from 0% to 25% for endoscopy. For coronary angiography, inappropriate use accounted for 28% of the variance in the county rate. For the other two procedures, no significant correlations were found between inappropriateness of use and rate of use. We conclude that little of the variation in the rates of use of these procedures can be explained by inappropriate use.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Identification of adverse events occurring during hospitalization. A cross-sectional study of litigation, quality assurance, and medical records at two teaching hospitals.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To estimate the efficacy of a medical record review for identifying adverse events and negligent case suffered by hospitalized patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study comparing an objective medical record review with information available from hospital quality assurance records as well as risk management and litigation records. SETTING: Two metropolitan teaching hospitals in the northeastern United States. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using the litigation and risk management records as a criterion standard, we found that the medical record review had a sensitivity of 80% (93 of 116; 95% CI, 73% to 88%) for discovering adverse events and a sensitivity of 76% (51 of 67; 95% CI, 66% to 86%) for discovering negligent care. We estimated that record review of a random sample of hospitalizations across a geographic region would have even higher sensitivity (adverse-event sensitivity, 84%; negligence sensitivity, 80%). Moreover, we found that the adverse events we failed to discover led to less costly malpractice claims. A significant number of adverse events (20 of 172) among hospitalizations never gave rise to litigation or risk management investigation. Six of the twenty were due to negligent care. Quality assurance efforts at the level of the clinical departments in one hospital led to review of only 12 out of 82 risk management records. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of adverse events and episodes of negligent care are discoverable with the methods we used to evaluate medical records. Quality assurance efforts using similar record review methods should be further evaluated.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed1990

Practice guidelines and standards: an overview.

Organized medicine, insurance companies, regulators, and the peer review organizations are all interested in practice guidelines. Recently, the U.S. Congress established the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, which is charged with overseeing the development of practice guidelines. If properly developed, disseminated, and used, practice guidelines should reduce the incidence of inappropriate care and help control costs. Although guidelines have been used by physicians for years, guidelines now being developed should be more comprehensive, specific, exhaustive, and--on the basis of the best scientific evidence of effectiveness and expert opinion--more effectively discriminate between useful and useless care. Practice guidelines can improve the quality of care when used voluntarily by physicians in practice, when used as standards for quality monitoring and assurance programs, and when used as the basis for reimbursement for services. All interested parties should share responsibilities for the research, development, and production of appropriateness criteria, their translation into guidelines and standards, and the dissemination and maintenance of the guidelines, including evaluation, revision, and updating.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1989

Relation between surgeons' practice volumes and geographic variation in the rate of carotid endarterectomy.

We examined the relation between the number of operative procedures carried out by individual surgeons and the variation in the rate of carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries in areas of high, average, and low use of the procedure in 1981. Rates ranged from 48 per 100,000 in the low-use area to 178 per 100,000 in the high-use area. Two variables accounted for most of the differences in the rates: the number of surgeons performing the procedure and the number of endarterectomies performed by surgeons with high practice volumes. Twice as many surgeons in the high-use area and 25 percent more in the average-use area performed carotid endarterectomy as compared with those in the low-use area. If the average number of cases per surgeon had been the same, the differences in the number of surgeons would have accounted for 36 percent and 15 percent, respectively, of the differences in use. Surgeons who performed 15 or more carotid endarterectomies during the year accounted for most of the variation in the rates. These high-volume surgeons represented 15 percent and 17 percent of the surgeons in the areas of high and average use, respectively, as compared with 4 percent of those in the low-use area. They accounted for 60 and 77 percent, respectively, of the additional endarterectomies. Three fourths of the surgeons performing carotid endarterectomies carried out fewer than 10, and 24 percent did only 1. We conclude that most of the geographic variation in the rate of carotid endarterectomy is caused by a few surgeons in high-use areas who perform large numbers of operations.

Carotid Arteries↗
PubMed1989

Unnecessary surgery.

The extent of unnecessary surgery has been the object of considerable speculation and occasional wild accusation in recent years. Most evidence of the existence of unnecessary surgery, such as information from studies of geographic variations and the results of second surgical opinion programs, is circumstantial. However, results from the few studies that have measured unnecessary surgery directly indicate that for some highly controversial operations the fraction that are unwarranted could be as high as 30 percent. Most unnecessary surgery results from physician uncertainty about the effectiveness of an operation. Elimination of this uncertainty requires more efficient production and dissemination of scientific information about clinical effectiveness. In the absence of adequate data from scientific studies, the use of a consensus of expert opinion, disseminated by means of comprehensive practice guidelines, offers the best opportunity to identify and eliminate unnecessary surgery.

Health Services↗
PubMed1987

Pyoderma gangrenosum occurring at multiple surgical incision sites.

Ten weeks after subtotal colectomy and ileostomy for ulcerative colitis, a 16-yr-old girl developed wound drainage and back pain. Massive ulceration and skin separation occurred at the abdominal wound incision as well as at the incision sites of a previous central venous line. A diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum was made. High-dose steroid treatment induced prompt healing of the abdominal wound as well as the catheter sites. Pyoderma gangrenosum has rarely been seen in surgical wounds. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of pyoderma gangrenosum occurring simultaneously in multiple surgical incision sites in a patient with ulcerative colitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1979

Bronchogenic cyst.

Two recent patients with bronchogenic cysts, presenting in an atypical manner, stimulated our review of this subject. Twenty patients with bronchogenic cysts have been treated at the Boston Floating Hospital over the past 20 yr. Of these patients, 19 out of 20 were symptomatic, the most common symptom being fever (6 out of 20). Half of our patients had no respiratory symptoms but only one was found to have an asymptomatic mass on chest x-ray. The majority of theses cysts were found within the pulmonary parenchyma, the right lung being affected three times more commonly than the left. These facts are at odds with the reports in the literature. Three were found in the neck. Bronchogenic cysts are generally thought to be small, solitary, and limited in area. However, a significant number in our series (8 out of 20) were large, multiple or multicystic, and involved segments, lobes, multiple lobes, and, on one occasion, an entire lung. The correct pre-operative diagnosis was made in only 30% of the cases. The fact that the diagnosis was often missed led to long delays in treatment resulting in recurrent infectious complications and repeated hospitalizations. The most common cause of error in diagnosis was failure to follow a pneumonia to complete resolution. Despite the frequent delays in diagnosis, surgical treatment was curative in all patients.

Bronchial Diseases↗