PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Laurenti-Lions

Publications and source records attributed to L Laurenti-Lions.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Control of myoelectrical responses through reinforcement.

A classic experiment by Hefferline, Keenan, and Harford (1959) showed that small thumb-twitches, imperceptible to the subject, can be controlled by the consequences of terminating and/or postponing aversive noise. These findings were further investigated in three experiments reported here. Experiment 1 replicated the original study. Experiment 2 was a control study in which stimulus changes were presented as in Experiment 1, but independently of the responses. Under these conditions the response rate varied over a large range with no systematic relation to experimental events. The increments in response rate reported by Hefferline et al. were within the present range of variation, suggesting that conditioning in the earlier study may have reflected a consistency in the direction of change rather than an increase in rate beyond the baseline range. In the present experiment, however, the rate increase was absolute. In Experiment 3, analog rather than binary changes in stimulus conditions were used as reinforcement. Under these conditions, the rates of subjects whose responses were conditioned fell from 78% (in the previous experiment) to 31%.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

[Mathematical model of a learning process by biofeedback].

The aim of Biofeedback is to teach a subject to control some of his biological functions. This experimental method was numerous therapeutic applications. General laws of these particular learning processes have not yet been well understood. Mathematical models can be used in order to make evident these laws can lead to an optimization of the learning processes. The stochastic model presented here underlines the shortcomings of certain experimental procedures. Although it has been performed from one of our particular experiments, it can be applied to analogous experiments.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗

[Myoelectrical operant conditioning in man].

In the operant conditioning experiment described by HEFFERLINE et al. (1959) a subject terminates or postpones an aversive noise stimulation by producing a particular myoelectrical activity (operant response : OR). These authors observe an increase of OR occurrence frequency in subjects ignoring the aim of the experiment (naive subjects), and they come to the conclusion that this method is efficient. Nevertheless, the validity of this conclusion is questioned by the lack of control experiments. Hence, this work has to be restudied. We have submitted 13 subjects to a control experiment. Subjects were placed under conditions similar to those used by HEFFERLINE et al., but without any contingency relating the myoelectric activity with the aversive stimulus. The results of these open-loop experiments showed that in a given subject, OR occurrence frequency may vary in large proportions as a function of time. In HEFFERLINE's naive subjects, the increase of occurrence frequency remained completely within the limits of spontaneous variations observed in our control subjects. Therefore, this increase is not significant. We have submitted 18 subjects to a conditioning experiment. 14 subjects among them produced more OR than those of the control subjects during the closed-loop experiment. We conclude that these 14 subjects have been actually conditioned.

Avoidance Learning↗