L Leighton-Beck | PubMed Health

PubMed2001

A framework for developing excellence as a clinical educator.

The current emphasis on providing quality undergraduate and postgraduate medical education has focused attention on the educational responsibilities of all doctors. There is a greater awareness of the need to train doctors as educators and courses have been set up to satisfy this need. Some courses, such as those on how to conduct appraisal, are specific to one task facing a medical educator. Other courses take a broader view and relate educational theory to practice. In this paper we describe an outcome-based approach in which competence in teaching is defined in terms of 12 learning outcomes. The framework provides a holistic approach to the roles of the teacher and supports the professionalism of teaching. Such a framework provides the basis for the development of a curriculum for teaching excellence. It helps to define important competences for different categories of teachers, communicate the areas to be addressed in a course, identify gaps in course provision, evaluate courses, assist in staff planning and allow individuals to assess their personal learning needs. The framework is presented to encourage wider debate.

Curriculum↗

PubMed2000

Raising research awareness among midwives and nurses: does it work?

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two approaches to increase research awareness among midwives and nurses. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental with the attitudes of staff in the two groups being measured at two points (January and October 1997). SAMPLE: All midwives and nurses working in four clinical areas in an acute NHS Trust. The intervention arm of the study involved all midwives and nurses in the Clinical Directorate of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, while the control arm involved all nurses working in a specialist oncology and haematology unit and in the children's directorate. ETHICS: The Joint Ethics Committee considered approval unnecessary because the study involved staff and not patients. DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected by self-complete questionnaires. INTERVENTIONS: A programme of education with policy and practice interventions targeted at ward sisters. OUTCOME MEASURES: Staff attitudes to, knowledge of, and level of involvement in, research. RESULTS: The study demonstrated a significant increase in both knowledge and use of research resources. Following the programme of education, staff in the intervention group were significantly more likely to use resources associated with research utilization and to report that they had read a research paper within the last month. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The time scale of the intervention was restricted by the funding available; a significant Hawthorne effect was evident with both groups showing an increase in knowledge; the pragmatic nature of the study meant that it was not possible to randomize the study groups; the scale of the study did not permit an economic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of clinical governance challenges healthcare providers to improve the care they deliver. There are huge opportunities for Trusts to invest in developing staff knowledge and use of research. However, staff will only seize these opportunities if there is an appropriate, enabling environment--an environment that delivers intensive interventions and is sensitive to the wider structural factors in the NHS affecting staff morale and commitment. In the absence of this environment, what may be seen as opportunities to managers may be regarded as just another burden by staff.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Networking: putting research at the heart of professional practice.

Nursing staff in Scotland have access to five local multidisciplinary health services research Networks. These offer nurses guidance, advice and support on relevant but unanswered questions relating to their clinical practice, thus helping them to take forward their enquiry. This article explores the origin, usefulness and developing role of these Networks with particular reference to the North of Scotland Network. Networking is recommended as an effective intervention to facilitate the development of research, to promote the quality, quantity and usefulness of research, and to place research into patient care at the heart of nursing practice.

Community Networks↗