PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L M Jazrawi

Publications and source records attributed to L M Jazrawi.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Bone and cartilage formation in an experimental model of distraction osteogenesis.

OBJECTIVES: (a) To develop a reliable and reproducible system for distraction osteogenesis in the rat to establish a model for future investigations of bone repair and regeneration. (b) To describe and characterize the histological events in distraction osteogenesis in the rat and to determine whether cartilage development is a normal component of the process. STUDY DESIGN: Species-specific, longitudinal time study. METHODS: Twenty rats underwent production of a middiaphyseal femoral osteotomy and application of a monolateral external fixator specifically designed for distraction. Animals were divided into five groups based on the time and extent of lengthening. RESULTS: During distraction, gap tissue showed collagen bundles and fibroblasts that were oriented longitudinally to the direction of the distraction force. Woven bone appeared to be laid down on these collagen scaffolds, and the newly formed vascular sinuses appeared to be the sites from which bone formation was initiated within the distraction gap. All groups undergoing active distraction showed intramembranous ossification in the distraction gap and endochondral ossification peripherally. However, when distraction was discontinued, endochondral ossification was observed in the gap. CONCLUSION: Distraction produces an environment in the distraction gap that suppresses the formation of cartilage. The formation of cartilage by injured periosteum, however, is obligatory and does not appear to be influenced by distraction. Bone formation within the distraction gap occurs where angiogenesis develops.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Hard bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic osteolysis and aseptic loosening are serious problems affecting the outcome of total joint replacement. Polyethylene particulate debris generated from metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces and the resulting biologic response to this debris are thought to be largely responsible. As a result, there has been a renewal of interest in hard bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty, including both metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic components. The new-generation all-ceramic and all-metal prostheses have demonstrated, both clinically and in the laboratory, lower friction and wear rates than metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces. Theoretically, lower wear rates result in less particulate debris and decreased inflammatory response. Despite excellent tribologic (lubrication, friction, wear) properties, metal-on-metal bearings raise associated issues of metal sensitivity and toxicity. For ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces, issues of ceramic quality and the possibility of brittle fracture must be considered.

Biocompatible Materials↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Alternative bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty.

The biologic response to polyethylene particulate debris generated from metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces is thought to be largely responsible for periprosthetic osteolysis and aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty. As a result, there has been an interest in developing polyethylene with improved wear characteristics, as well as a renewed interest in alternative bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty, including ceramic-polyethylene, metal-metal, and ceramic-ceramic articulations. These alternative surfaces have demonstrated less friction and lower wear rates than metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces in both clinical and laboratory experiments. Clinical results, although only short- to mid-term, have been encouraging. Alternative bearing surfaces, with lower wear rates and less particulate debris formation, may have the potential to improve total joint arthroplasty survivorship by decreasing periprosthetic osteolysis, especially in younger, high-demand patients.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Arthroscopic stabilization of anterior shoulder instability: a historical perspective.

The role of arthroscopic procedures in the management of glenohumeral instability continues to evolve and represents an effective alternative for addressing the pathology associated with this condition. Patient selection criteria, operative techniques, and implants all continue to evolve and have resulted in improved rates of success. Arthroscopic procedures benefit patients by avoiding the common morbidities associated with the disruption of the anterior soft tissues, including a loss of external rotation associated with open procedures. Arthroscopic procedures remain technically demanding and require skills to address all of the existing pathology. The surgeon must be prepared to address many conditions beyond the Bankart lesions including glenoid bone lesions. capsular laxity, rotator interval lesions, and SLAP lesions. In addition to the documentation of recurrence, the success of this procedure must be evaluated within the context of retained ranges of motion, recovery time, proprioceptive control, and the return to prior levels of activity. Further studies are necessary to continue to validate the efficacy of arthroscopic stabilization.

Arthroscopy↗