PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L M Lucchesi

Publications and source records attributed to L M Lucchesi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Zolpidem and memory: a study using the process-dissociation procedure.

RATIONALE: There is a dearth of studies which have employed sophisticated paradigms to investigate the effects of zolpidem on memory. OBJECTIVES: To explore anterograde cognitive deficits induced by acute oral doses of zolpidem by means of the process-dissociation procedure (PDP). METHODS: The present study followed a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group design. Young, healthy females were randomly allocated to one of three treatments with 12 subjects each: placebo, 5 mg and 10 mg zolpidem. Two word-stem completion tasks were carried out close to theoretical peak-plasma concentration: a) direct inclusion task with cued recall, in which participants had to try to use words seen at study to complete stems; and b) direct exclusion task, in which words seen at study were to be avoided as completions. The PDP was applied to the results in these tasks to yield indices of explicit/controlled (C) and implicit/automatic (A) memory. Classical psychometric tests were also carried out. RESULTS: Zolpidem 10 mg led to cognitive effects similar to benzodiazepines (except for the atypical lorazepam), including impairment of exclusion, but not inclusion-task performance. Results of the application of the PDP were inconclusive but concurred with the pattern established in previously published work on benzodiazepine effects, i.e. that zolpidem (10 mg) impaired C. CONCLUSIONS: Zolpidem leads to cognitive effects similar to most benzodiazepines. Although the application of PDP in drug studies may be counterproductive in view of methodological difficulties that are discussed, the pattern of effects on the stem-completion tasks involved in this paradigm is potentially useful in the investigation of cognitive effects of psychoactive drugs.

Administration, Oral↗

A double-dissociation of behavioural and event-related potential effects of two benzodiazepines with similar potencies.

This study was designed to explore the role of benzodiazepine affinity to benzodiazepine binding site on acute psychomotor, subjective and memory effects, as well as auditory Event Related Potential (ERP) latencies, in healthy volunteers. Two benzodiazepines with similar affinity to benzodiazepine binding sites, or potency, were compared: the atypical compound lorazepam (2.0 mg), which has been reported to impair priming, and a standard benzodiazepine, flunitrazepam (0.6 mg, 0.8 mg, 1.0 mg). The study followed a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group design. Sixty subjects completed a test battery before treatment and at theoretical peak plasma concentration of drugs. Lorazepam and 1.0 mg of flunitrazepam led to comparable alterations on psychomotor, subjective and auditory episodic memory measures. A double-dissociation was found for lorazepam and the equipotent dose of flunitrazepam (1.0 mg): lorazepam was more deleterious than flunitrazepam in time taken to identify fragmented shapes. Lorazepam also impaired direct and indirect stem-completion in comparison to placebo, but this effect was abolished when time to identify shapes was used as a covariate. By contrast, 1.0 mg of flunitrazepam prolonged auditory ERP latencies to a greater extent than lorazepam. High affinity to the benzodiazepine binding sites does not seem to explain the consistent lorazepam-induced impairment of indirect stem-completion. Differences in impairment profile between the benzodiazepines employed may relate to the modality (visual or not) of the tasks used.

Adolescent↗