PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L M Pallardó

Publications and source records attributed to L M Pallardó.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Transplant renal artery stenosis: association with acute vascular rejection.

BACKGROUND: Transplant renal artery stenosis, the prevalence of which varies from 2% to 12%, is an important cause of hypertension and allograft dysfunction. We sought to determine the clinical characteristics of this disorder, assessing, predisposing factors, establishing treatment options, and examining patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 321 renal allograft recipients between November 1996 and December 2004, six patients were identified with this finding. We analyzed their clinical data before and after treatment compared with the 315 recipients face of the disorder. RESULTS: The six patients with the disorder were diagnosed within the first year (2 to 8 months; median 5.5 months). All patients displayed renal dysfunction, peripheral edema, and new-onset or uncontrolled hypertension at presentation. Abnormal Doppler findings were observed in 5 (83.3%) patients. The hemodynamically significant stenosis was successfully treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in all six. However, 3 (50%) patients displayed recurrent stenosis requiring a second PTA. The mean serum creatinine level decreased from a pre-PTA value of 4.4 +/- 1.8 mg/dL to a 1-month post-PTA value of 2.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dL (P = .027). Patients had no significant improvement in mean systolic and diastolic pressure. Vascular acute rejection episodes were more frequent among the affected than the control group (3/6; 50% vs 18/315; 5.7%; P < .001). No differences were found in age, sex, donor type, etiology of renal disease, immunosuppression, acute tubular necrosis, acute cellular rejection, cold ischemia time, or HLA matching. CONCLUSION: Transplant renal artery stenosis is a common cause of hypertension and renal allograft dysfunction. Acute vascular rejection is associated with this disorder.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Erythropoietin treatment in the sixth posttransplant month as a prognostic factor for renal allograft survival.

The purpose of this work was to assess the prognostic value of the need for erythropoietin (EPO) treatment at 6 months after transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 143 consecutive cadaveric kidney transplants performed between January 2000 and April 2004, functioning at 6 months postransplantation. Patients were divided into two groups: group EPO6m (n = 24) received EPO treatment in the sixth month, and a control group (n = 119) did not receive EPO. Renal function deterioration (RFD) was considered to be a sustained decrease in creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 20% between the sixth month postransplant and the last visit. Mean follow-up was 38 +/- 16 months. The mean ages of the donor (57 +/- 9 vs 49 +/- 12 years; P = .001) and the recipient (59 +/- 12 vs 47 +/- 17 years; P = .000) were greater in the EPO6m group. Delayed graft function (83% vs 48%; P = .001) was more frequent in the EPO6m group. At 6 months after transplantation the EPO6m group showed lower hemoglobin (11.52 +/- 1.71 vs 13.32 +/- 1.69 g/dL; P = .000), higher serum creatinine (2.31 +/- 0.72 vs 1.65 +/- 0.53 mg/dL; P = .000), lower CrCl (33.53 +/- 10.83 vs 53.6 +/- 17.58 mL/min; P = .000), and similar proteinuria. RFD was more common in the EPO6m group (38% vs 10%; P = .026), with a different pattern of evolution of CrCl (-0.098 +/- 0.176 vs +0.093 +/- 0.396 mL/min/mo, P = .000). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment with EPO at 6 months was the only predictor of RFD (RR 4.46; 1.58 to 12.58; P = .005). The need for EPO at 6 months postransplant was a good predictor of later renal allograft deterioration, more sensitive than serum creatinine or proteinuria.

Aged↗

[Renal transplantation with positive crossmatch].

INTRODUCTION: Lymphocytotoxic antibodies reduce the expectancy of renal transplantation due to the increased risk of a positive crossmatch. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the evolution of eight kidney transplants performed in our unit in presence of a positive crossmatch with historical T and/or B lymphocyte positive crossmatches. RESULTS: Mean panel reactivity was 76,6 +/- 25,7% (r: 22-100%), been higher than 75% in six patients. Six patients were recipients of a second or third transplant. Immunosuppression consisted of quadruple therapy including induction with thymoglobuline. Five patients had delayed graft function, and one had primary non-function of the graft. One patient lost her graft due to chronic allograft nephropathy in the second year postransplantation. Six patients maintained a good renal function (serum creatinine 1,2 +/- 0,5 mg/dl, proteinuria 0,20 +/- 0,34 g/day). CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation in presence of a positive cross-match with historical serum and T lymphocytes and/or B lymphocytes, was followed by a satisfactory graft survival.

Adult↗

[Chronological aggregation of subcutaneous mycosis in renal transplant recipients].

We present four cases of subcutaneous invasive mycosis in renal transplant recipients that happened in our Unit during a period of eight months. The Microbiology Department did not find any fungi when they studied possible reservoirs and vectors for transmission. We speculate about the reasons of this chronological aggregation. We discuss the treatment that we used for these infections.

Aged↗

[Post-transplant diabetes mellitus associated with acute hepatitis C virus infection in a renal transplant recipient].

There are some controversial reports about the pathogenic role of hepatitis C virus infection on diabetes mellitus in renal graft recipients. We report a case of a renal transplanted who developed diabetes mellitus post-transplantation during an acute hepatitis C virus infection. We discuss the multifactorial etiology of post-transplant diabetes mellitus, and the possible interaction between tacrolimus and an acute virus C infection on its pathogenesis.

Acute Disease↗

[Prognostic significance of programmed dialysis in patients who initiate renal substitutive treatment. Multicenter study in Spain].

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to analyse patient characteristics, mortality and costs, all of them in relation to whether starting dialysis was planned or unplanned. METHODS: A total of 362 patients (227 male and 135 female) from five hospitals of the National Health System, who were started on chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT) during 1996 and 1997 were included. Patients who were started on RRT after acute renal failure were excluded. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the demographic characteristics, patients' conditions at the time of initiating dialysis and outcome and costs at six and thirty-six months of treatment. Patients were classified as planned (PL-D) or unplanned dialysis (UNPL-D), depending on whether or not the patient had a vascular or peritoneal access ready to use for initiating RRT. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-six patients (51.4%) started on dialysis in the PL-D group whereas 176 (48.6%) did it as UNPL-D. In this latter group, 135 (37.3% of the total) had previously been monitored by a nephrologist, and 41 (11.3%) initiated dialysis without previous nephrological follow-up. UNPL-D was associated with older age (p < 0.001), non-nephrological follow-up (p < 0.001), diabetes (34.7% vs 22.6%) (p = 0.011), haemodialysis as a first mode of RRT (94.9 vs 81.7%) (p < 0.001), higher comorbidity risk (p < 0.001), dialysis initiation with uraemic symptoms or fluid overload (p < 0.001), increased blood transfusion requirement (p < 0.001) and lower serum albumin (p < 0.001), creatinine clearance (p < 0.001), haemoglobin concentration (p < 0.001), and weight (p = 0.002). In the PL-D group the main primary renal diseases were glomerular and polycystic disease, whereas interstitial and diabetic nephropathy were higher in UNPL-D group (p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that previous non nephrological follow-up, uraemic symptoms, interstitial nephritis as primary renal disease correlated with UNPL-D initiation, and it was followed by choosing haemodialysis as first RRT. UNPL-D was also associated with increased number of days of hospitalization at the initiation of dialysis, and during the first 6 months (p < 0.001), increase of hospitalization days (p = 0.009), and increased 6-month-mortality (10.2% vs 3.2%) (p = 0.015, log rank test), and three-year mortality (24.2 vs 36.9%) (p = 0.006, log rank test). The costs of UNPL-D were fivefold that of the PL-D group. CONCLUSION: UNPL-D has been associated with worse overall clinical conditions at the initiation of chronic replacement therapy, choosing haemodialysis as first RRT, increased morbi-mortality and subsequent increase of costs.

Adolescent↗