PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L M Prisant

Publications and source records attributed to L M Prisant.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Variability and similarity of manual office and automated blood pressures.

The evaluation and management of hypertension is based on indirect blood pressures obtained in the office (COBPs) using the mercury sphygmomanometer. The usefulness of COBPs is limited by factors such as observer bias, which confound the ability to discern the true blood pressure value. Automated portable monitors have been marketed, which also measure blood pressure (ABP) indirectly throughout 24 hours, but without human intervention. Acceptance of a new device that indirectly records blood pressure depends largely on its the agreement with the established method of blood pressure measurement. This review compares the variability of blood pressures collected indirectly by standard mercury sphygmomanometer and by an auscultatory automated portable blood pressure monitor. The results indicate that blood pressure, when measured indirectly in a hypertensive patient, is quite variable. Automated blood pressures were lower and demonstrated less within-subject variability during repeated measures than COBPs. The agreement between ABPs and COBPs was better than the agreement between COBPs alone on successive visits. In addition, the mean hourly blood pressure profiles recorded throughout 24 hours by automated and manual methods from ten hypertensive patients were nearly identical. These data suggest that blood pressures measured by auscultatory automated methods are similar to and representative of those obtained manually.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1992

Clinical utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in target organ complications and equipment choices.

Although population studies have demonstrated a relationship between casual office blood pressures and target organ events, the variability of these blood pressure measurements for individual patients has generated an interest in the role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for defining the presence of hypertension and assessing the response to therapy. Noninvasive devices provide fewer data than intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices, but are safer. No current noninvasive device performs well during ambulation. Rigorous evaluation of these rapid proliferating electronic devices is important, as would be the case with any new antihypertensive agent. Although ambulatory blood pressure measurements correlate better with target organ damage for groups of patients than do casual office measurements, the predictability and limited data on reproducibility for individual patients does not support widespread application for routine testing for hypertensive patients. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be viewed as a standard research tool for the evaluation of new cardiovascular drugs.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1992

Congestive heart failure with normal ejection fraction. A different mechanism requiring different therapy.

Clinicians must remain undaunted when history, physical examination, and chest radiography suggest congestive heart failure but left ventricular systolic function is normal. Many of these patients have diastolic dysfunction, and standard therapy for left ventricular systolic dysfunction is often ineffectual or detrimental. Noninvasive testing is subject to many pitfalls but may confirm a clinical suspicion and provide indications to treat or to proceed with invasive testing. In the absence of clinical signs and symptoms of congestive failure, however, abnormal diastolic indexes should not be interpreted as diagnostic of diastolic dysfunction and are not an indication to treat.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1992

A negative thallium (+/- dipyridamole) stress test excludes significant obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients.

The operating characteristics of thallium stress testing for detection of significant epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) in hypertensive subjects with chest pain or electrocardiographic (ECG) ischemia have not been previously defined. This becomes important because of the high prevalence of both hypertensive heart disease and CAD. Ninety-two hypertensives with a history of typical or atypical chest pain or ECG myocardial ischemia underwent coronary arteriography, 2D-guided echocardiography, and thallium-201 stress testing, combined with intravenous dipyridamole if the rate-pressure product was less than 20,000. Patients with myocardial infarction, prior revascularization procedure, valvular heart disease, and chronic ethanol abuse were excluded. The mean age was 54.8 +/- 9.9 years with 55% blacks and 46% women. Eighteen patients (19.6%) had significant (greater than or equal to 50% luminal diameter narrowing) epicardial CAD at catheterization, of whom 17 had positive thallium scans. Overall, there were 17 true positives, 47 true negatives, 27 false positives, and one false negative resulting in 94.4 +/- 5.4% sensitivity (95% confidence limits [95% CL] 71 to 100%), 63.5 +/- 5.6% specificity (95% CL 51 to 74%), 38.6 +/- 7.3% positive predictive value (95% CL 25 to 54%), 97.9 +/- 2.1% negative predictive value (95% CL 88 to 100%), and 69.6 +/- 4.8% overall accuracy (95% CL 59 to 79%). For hypertensive patients with chest pain or ECG myocardial ischemia, the high sensitivity and negative predictive value and low false negative rate support the role of thallium stress testing +/- dipyridamole as an exclusion test for significant CAD.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Repeatability of automated ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

BACKGROUND: The repeatability of 24-hour automatic ambulatory blood pressure measurements recorded by noninvasive equipment (Del Mar Pressurometer IV) was assessed to determine the intrapatient variability of this test. METHODS: The usual antihypertensive medications of 73 patients with documented essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 119 mm Hg) were withdrawn, and the patients were treated with placebo medication for 6 weeks. At the end of the placebo period, ambulatory blood pressure measurements of each patient were recorded every 15 minutes for 24 hours on two separate occasions 1 week apart. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in either the 24-hour systolic or diastolic blood pressure for the entire group between weeks. A mean difference for individual patients between the first and second recording within 5 mm Hg was observed in 49.3% and 52.1% of patients for 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. The correlation coefficient for 24-hour systolic blood pressure was greater than 24-hour diastolic blood pressure (r = .87 vs r = .67). A difference greater than 18.1/14.9 mm Hg for systolic/diastolic blood pressure would be required to assign a significant (P less than .05) change in blood pressure between two recordings in the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: These data quantify the usefulness of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements for a group of subjects. However, mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure varies significantly for individuals. Intrapatient variability may limit the usefulness of a single 24-hour ambulatory recording for an individual patient and suggests the need for more than one measurement to establish a level of blood pressure.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of filling and emptying parameters and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in normotensives and hypertensives.

To evaluate the relationship between office and ambulatory BP measurements and filling and emptying parameters, 15 hypertensive and 15 control subjects underwent both 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring and Doppler echocardiography. No patient received antihypertensive medication for 3-4 weeks, had echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (greater than or equal to 12 mm) or a diastolic BP greater than 100 mm Hg. The time from R wave on the electrocardiogram to onset of ejection was prolonged in hypertensives (P less than 0.05). There were no differences between the hypertensives and normotensives for diastolic filling abnormalities. Finally, neither office nor ambulatory BP correlated with either Doppler filling or emptying parameters.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Variability of indirect methods used to determine blood pressure. Office vs mean 24-hour automated blood pressures.

Blood pressure is a cardiovascular measurement with dynamic characteristics that can be influenced by a number of internal and external factors. The preferred blood pressure determination method would be one that reduces variability between measurements and that reflects the true blood pressure level. In this article, we present the variability of, and agreement between, the blood pressures collected by two indirect methods on the same patients during a hypertensive research project. Data obtained on patients in a typical clinical setting are also provided. Twenty-four-hour diastolic pressures obtained by the automated method demonstrated no regression to a lower mean, while blood pressures obtained casually in the office exhibited such regression. The 95% confidence interval of repeated measures for casual office blood pressure on a patient in a research setting (35/17 mm Hg) or in typical clinic practice (26/19 mm Hg) were similar, while the range of the mean 24-hour automated blood pressure monitoring (21/11 mm Hg) was smaller and demonstrated less variability. The magnitudes of the differences in blood pressures obtained on separate occasions in the same subjects were significantly lower with automated vs casual blood pressure determination methods (7.9/4.6 vs 13.7/7.4 mm Hg for both systolic and diastolic pressures). The agreement (95% confidence interval) between blood pressures obtained by the two methods (19/12 mm Hg) was found to be similar to the repeatability of automated blood pressure monitoring alone, and superior to that for data recorded casually in the office (35/17 mm Hg). Thus, the variability in mean 24-hour automated blood pressures is less than that for casual office blood pressures. The clinician should understand that the variability of blood pressures measured on an individual may be much greater than that reported for populations of hypertensive patients, and must be considered when applying epidemiologic group data to a specific patient. Moreover, any methodology of indirect blood pressure measurement that may reduce the variability and improve repeatability of casual office blood pressures deserves further consideration.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1991

The effect of cardiac catheterization on fasting lipids.

Fasting lipid profiles were measured in 20 selected patients the day of and after cardiac catheterization in EDTA tubes. Samples were randomly labelled A or B, centrifuged, and stored at 3 degrees Centigrade. Lipid profiles were analyzed by a laboratory, which was participating in the Center for Disease Control Lipid Standardization Program, by using standard methods. The coefficients of variation for repeated measurements were: cholesterol = 1.9%, triglycerides = 3.6%, HDL cholesterol = 4.3%, and VLDL and LDL cholesterol = 2.6%. Data were evaluated by a two-tailed paired t-test and correlation coefficient. The total cholesterol was significantly lower (P less than .001) the day after cardiac catheterization as was the LDL cholesterol (P less than .002). Both VLDL and HDL cholesterol and triglycerides were lower, but these were not statistically significant. The mean dose of heparin was 3500 +/- 1469 units, and the mean dose of contrast was 181 +/- 30 cc. The total dose of heparin or contrast did not correlate with any change in lipid profiles. These results have implications on the number and timing of venous blood sampling for lipid measurements in regard to diagnosis and treatment of hyperlipidemia. Lipid profiles should not be drawn after cardiac catheterization but rather before and/or in the free-living state.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Once-daily verapamil in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind placebo-controlled dose-ranging study.

Supine office blood pressures (SOBP) and 24-hour automated ambulatory blood pressure monitorings (AABPM) showed blood pressure reductions from a stable baseline to active treatment with 120-, 240-, and 480-mg doses of a new verapamil QD capsule (solid-spheroidal-oral once-daily drug-absorption system: (SODAS) in patients with mild-to-moderately severe (diastolic blood pressures 95-119 mm Hg) essential hypertension. Reductions were documented at 24 hours, hourly, and by the 24 hour average, using SOBP and AABPM, after the once-daily verapamil administration. Both SOBP and the 24-hour average by AABPM were significantly reduced from baseline by active verapamil treatment of 120-, 240-, and 480-mg doses. In comparison to verapamil QD (0 mg), blood pressure reductions from baseline to active treatment were significant at the 240- and 480-mg doses but not at the 120-mg dose. There was a significant linear dose response. This verapamil formulation (SODAS) was effective throughout the 24-hour period after once-daily dosing.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1991

Mexiletine versus quinidine as first-line antiarrhythmia therapy: results from consecutive trials.

The efficacy of mexiletine and quinidine in controlling ventricular couplets (VC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) was compared in 156 trials (78 for each drug) in 114 consecutive patients. Forty-two patients received both drugs, whereas 36 patients were given mexiletine, and 36 patients received quinidine only. During acute drug testing, mexiletine was more effective than quinidine in controlling VC and VT (54 vs. 32 patients, respectively, P less than .001) and resulted in fewer proarrhythmic events (4 vs. 13, respectively, P less than .05). Mean duration of follow-up for mexiletine (27 +/- 14 mo) and quinidine (21 +/- 14 mo) did not differ. Long-term success was more frequent with mexiletine administration than quinidine administration (33/47 vs. 10/30 patients, respectively, P less than .01). The incidence of sudden death during follow-up with the two drugs did not differ overall, but more patients with ejection fraction greater than or equal to 40% died suddenly while taking quinidine than while receiving mexiletine (4/17 vs. 0/24, P less than .02). Mexiletine is as effective as quinidine for treating VC and VT and appears to be less proarrhythmic. It should be considered as an initial choice in the management of VC and VT.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Assessment of electrocardiographic ischemia in hypertensive patients treated with isradipine or placebo.

A total of 203 patients with hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure of 100-119 mm Hg) from six centers entered into a 3-week placebo baseline followed by 5 weeks of active treatment (either placebo or isradipine 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 mg BID) to determine the effectiveness of isradipine on blood pressure control. Electrocardiographic criteria for left-ventricular ischemia were coded blindly using the Minnesota Codes 4-1 to 4-4 and 5-1 to 5-3 at the end of baseline and active treatment periods. One hundred seventy patients with hypertension and matching and complete electrocardiograms completed the study for analysis: 63 (37%) were white and 117 (69%) were men. They were 52.1 +/- 10.3 years old mean +/- SD; range: 22-77 years). No myocardial infarction occurred during the active phase. Fifty-eight of 170 (34%) at baseline and 54 of 116 (32%) at week 5 had left atrial enlargement. Romhilt-Estes left-ventricular hypertrophy was not significantly different at baseline versus active treatment: 14 of 170 (8.2%) versus 15 of 170 (8.8%). At baseline, the rate of active ischemia was 28.2% (48/170): 27.8% (10/36) were randomized to receive placebo during active treatment and 28.4% (38/134) were given isradipine (P = NS). For those without ischemia at baseline, the rate of change to electrocardiographic ischemia during active treatment was 0% (0/26) for those receiving placebo and 3.1% (3/96) for those taking isradipine (P = NS). For those with ischemia at baseline, the rate of change to no ischemia during active treatment was 20% (2/10) for those receiving placebo and 10.5% (4/38) for those taking isradipine (P = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Relationship of left ventricular mass to impairment of coronary vasodilator reserve in hypertensive heart disease.

An impaired coronary vasodilator reserve has been demonstrated in all stages of hypertensive heart disease but is most likely in the setting of hypertrophy. The decrease in coronary flow reserve has, however, not been predictable previously. We postulated that flow reserve depression might be related to a left ventricular mass threshold. Seventy-two patients (82% with hypertension) with suspected ischemic heart disease who were found to be free of significant coronary artery disease at cardiac catheterization were evaluated utilizing the intracoronary Doppler catheter and two-dimensional directed M-mode echocardiography for determination of coronary flow reserve and left ventricular mass. For left ventricular mass indexed (LVMI) by body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to 50% above normal using established gender-specific norms, American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and PENN methods (correction of LV mass by regression equation agreeing with necropsy estimates of mass) predicted impairment of flow reserve (p = 0.005 and 0.009, respectively). Unindexed left ventricular mass and LVMI by height were not helpful in this regard. Using the ASE method for LV mass determination, coronary flow reserve was moderately depressed (2.4 +/- 1.0) for those with LVMI greater than or equal to 50% above normal; in comparison, flow reserve was normal (3.5 +/- 1.3) for those with LVMI less than 50% above normal. A rare patient was able to maintain a normal flow reserve when ASE- and Penn-indexed mass estimates were greater than or equal to 50% above normal, but only in the setting of a markedly elevated mean arterial pressure.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Depression associated with antihypertensive drugs.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a potential side effect of antihypertensive drug therapy. Consideration of this side effect is a reason often cited by physicians for not choosing certain drugs. METHODS: In this prospective study the relative rates of depression were measured by the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) in patients from four hypertension treatment groups. Treatment groups consisted of 466 patients receiving: (1) no drug therapy, (2) diuretics only, (3) diuretics plus reserpine, and (4) diuretics plus beta-blockers. Demographic data including age, sex, and race were collected. Analysis of variance was used to compare the rate of depression among the treatment groups, as well as among age, sex, and racial groups. RESULTS: Using a Zung SDS index of greater than or equal to 50, 35.4% of the hypertensive population was depressed. Age and sex were not significant factors in the frequency of depression. Blacks scored higher than whites in all drug treatment groups except those treated with high lipophilic beta-blockers, but the rate of depression was not higher. Whites on the lowest dose of reserpine had the lowest rate of depression. The rate of depression among those taking reserpine or beta-blockers was no different than that among those receiving either no treatment or diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Reserpine or beta-blocker therapy did not cause any more depression than any other antihypertensive treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Racial aspects of ambulatory blood pressure.

Ambulatory blood pressure measurements, recorded by a Del Mar Pressurometer IV, were performed in 71 patients (25 blacks and 46 whites) with documented essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure 95-119 mmHg) after four weeks of placebo treatment. Each 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement was calibrated with manual measurements within 5 mmHg and was repeated according to the daily conditions (work status) of the original recording. Ambulatory BP measurements were recorded every 15 minutes over 24 hours on two separate occasions one week apart. The mean of two 24-hour measurements was the value for the individual patient. Analyses of variance indicated no significant difference in the mean age, height, weight, 24-hour ambulatory systolic or diastolic BP, 8 am to 12 noon systolic or diastolic ambulatory BP, or 12 midnight to 4 am ambulatory systolic or diastolic BP for blacks versus whites. Among the subset of females, the 20 blacks were older than the 23 whites. Despite this age difference, there was no significant difference in height, weight or 24-hour, 8 am to 12 noon, or 12 midnight to 4 am ambulatory BP measurements. Therefore, this study does not support a racial difference in the level of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in these hypertensive patients.

Ambulatory Care↗