PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L M Ruilope

Publications and source records attributed to L M Ruilope.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antihypertensive drugs newer than diuretics and beta-blockers has not been established. We compared the effects of the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine once daily with the diuretic combination co-amilozide on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients with hypertension. METHODS: We did a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial in Europe and Israel in 6321 patients aged 55-80 years with hypertension (blood pressure > or = 150/95 mm Hg, or > or = 160 mm Hg systolic). Patients had at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. We randomly assigned patients nifedipine 30 mg in a long-acting gastrointestinal-transport-system (GITS) formulation (n=3157), or co-amilozide (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg [corrected] plus amiloride 2.5 mg; n=3164). Dose titration was by dose doubling, and addition of atenolol 25-50 mg or enalapril 5-10 mg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. Analysis was done by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Primary outcomes occurred in 200 (6.3%) patients in the nifedipine group and in 182 (5.8%) in the co-amilozide group (18.2 vs 16.5 events per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.10 [95% CI 0.91-1.34], p=0.35). Overall mean blood pressure fell from 173/99 mm Hg (SD 14/8) to 138/82 mm Hg (12/7). There was an 8% excess of withdrawals from the nifedipine group because of peripheral oedema (725 vs 518, p<0.0001), but serious adverse events were more frequent in the co-amilozide group (880 vs 796, p=0.02). Deaths were mainly non-vascular (nifedipine 176 vs co-amilozide 172; p=0.81). 80% of the primary events occurred in patients receiving randomised treatment (157 nifedipine, 147 co-amilozide, difference 0.33% [-0.7 to 1.4]). INTERPRETATION: Nifedipine once daily and co-amilozide were equally effective in preventing overall cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications. The choice of drug can be decided by tolerability and blood-pressure response rather than long-term safety or efficacy.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

[Relationship between cardiovascular risk profile and anti-hypertensive drug use. GEDEC (Spanish group of cardiovascular studies].

BACKGROUND: Hypertension guidelines emphasize the selection of antihypertensive treatment on the basis of absolute cardiovascular risk. Moreover, compelling and possible indications for each antihypertensive drug class are recommended for patients with other concomitant conditions. The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between the cardiovascular risk profile and co-morbid conditions on antihypertensive drug class use. METHODS: This is an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study performed in 2,850 essential hypertensive patients. Antihypertensive drug treatment has been evaluated on the basis of the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors, target organ damage or cardiovascular diseases, as well as the absolute cardiovascular risk profile. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes were treated more frequently with calcium channel blockers (CCB) and ACE inhibitors. However, the presence of hypercholesterolemia or smoking habit did not influence the use of antihypertensive drug classes. The presence of cerebrovascular disease increased the use of CCB and ACE inhibitors, whereas coronary disease increased the use of CCB and betablockers. The use of diuretics and angiotensin II receptor antagonists was increased in patients with cardiac failure, whereas neither betablockers nor ACE inhibitors were affected by this concomitant disease. Patients with the highest cardiovascular risk received more antihypertensive treatment than those with lower risk, but this was not accompanied by switching from old classes to new ones. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular risk profile seems to have little influence on the use of antihypertensive drug classes, particularly the presence of hypercholesterolemia or cardiac failure. It seems adequate to emphasize the necessity of an individualization of antihypertensive treatment, based on the presence of concomitant conditions that influence the absolute cardiovascular risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The protective role of atorvastatin on function, structure and ultrastructure in the aorta of dyslipidemic rabbits.

Responses to both an endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine 10(-9)-10(-5) mol/l) and an endothelium-independent vasodilator (sodium nitroprusside 10(-10)-10(-6) mol/l) were studied in aortic rings from rabbits fed or not with a diet containing 0.5% cholesterol plus 14% coconut oil for 14 weeks and treated or not with atorvastatin (2.5 mg/kg/day). Morphometric and ultrastructure analyses were also performed. Rabbits fed the dyslipidemic diet presented higher plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations than controls (P < 0.05). This was associated with intima-media thickening and, consequently, aortic stenosis (29 +/- 3%) since vessel cross-sectional area did not change. Endothelial cells presented numerous alterations in dyslipidemic rabbits. Atorvastatin treatment only reduced plasma levels in dyslipidemic rabbits (P < 0.05), which were nevertheless higher than those of controls. In addition, it prevented the reduction in acetylcholine relaxation in hypercholesterolemic animals. Atorvastatin administration also enhanced the response to acetylcholine in rabbits fed a control diet. Likewise, atorvastatin treatment reduced lesion area and consequently increased aortic lumen in dyslipidemic rabbits but did not modify media thickening. It also prevented the majority of the ultrastructural changes observed in endothelial cells. In conclusion, chronic atorvastatin treatment exerts a protective role in vascular function, structure and ultrastructure even in the presence of high cholesterol and triglyceride plasma levels.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Treatment of hypertension in diabetes mellitus.

In this article we emphasize the need for prompt intervention in diabetic patients with high blood pressure in order to protect the heart, brain, kidney, and the vascular tree against arteriosclerotic damage, which is the main cause of mortality in type 1, and particularly type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent placebo-controlled, randomized trials indicate that compared with the nondiabetic population, a lower blood pressure threshold for intervention and a lower target blood pressure are adequate in terms of target organ protection. Although all major classes of antihypertensive drugs have demonstrated a potential benefit in treating diabetic hypertensive patients, blocking the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is especially useful in patients at high risk for myocardial infarction and/or renal damage. The new class of antihypertensive agents that block the angiotensin II receptor have renal effects very close to those observed with ACE inhibitors. The potential role of this new class in the treatment of hypertension in diabetes will depend on the results of ongoing trials.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2000

Renal implications of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in heart failure.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system actively participates in the derangement of renal function since the early stages of heart failure (HF). A diminished capacity to excrete sodium secondary to increased proximal tubular re-absorption and loss of the renal functional reserve are the two most relevant initial alterations of renal function in which angiotensin II has been proven to act directly. Meanwhile, the octapeptide contributes to maintain glomerular filtration rate (GFR) within normal limits through efferent arteriole vasoconstriction. Administration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA) may thus be accompanied by a functional fall in that parameter. Advanced age, higher initial serum creatinine, history of hypertension, diabetes and atrial fibrillation predict the onset of GFR impairment associated with blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Concomitant administration of betablockers may help to protect renal function, and preliminary data indicate that the combination of ACEi and ARA is not accompanied by a higher renal risk. The good prognostic effects of aldosterone antagonists in HF does not seem to be related to intrarenal effects of these compounds with the exception of preventing potassium loss and hypokalemia. The systematic therapeutic use of drug(s) provided with beneficial renal effects, to treat arterial hypertension or myocardial ischemia, may contribute to delay of, or prevent the development of HF.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Do we effectively lower blood pressure?

Blood pressure control is needed in order to attain a normalization of the increased cardiovascular risk present in the hypertensive population. However, we are far from obtaining the most effective control of blood pressure. A more aggressive attitude, in particular in high-risk patients, is required, together with an adequate selection of antihypertensive pharmacological therapies. In this sense combined therapy has to be more widely used in patients presenting with the characteristics detailed in the newly published mega-trials like the Hypertension Optimal Treatment study. An adequate selection of the components of combination could also be of interest through a better protective capacity mediated by blood pressure-independent effects.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2000

Influence of diabetes and type of hypertension on response to antihypertensive treatment.

The aim of our investigation was to determine whether the presence of additional risk factors or type of hypertension (diastolic or isolated systolic) influences blood pressure (BP) response to treatment. The International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) study is a double-blinded outcome comparison of calcium channel blockade with diuretics in high-risk patients aged 55 to 80 years. Dynamic randomization between nifedipine once daily and hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride was performed to ensure that approximately equal numbers of patients in the 2 groups had each of the major cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension were also separately randomized. Atenolol or enalapril was the mandatory second-line drug. In 5669 patients who completed the 18-week titration, BP fell from 172+/-15/99+/-9 mm Hg (mean+/-SD) while receiving placebo to 139+/-12/82+/-7 mm Hg. Twenty-six percent of patients required 2 drugs, and 4% required 3 drugs. Patients with diabetes were the most resistant to treatment, requiring second and third drugs 40% and 100% more frequently than patients without diabetes and achieving marginally the highest final BP, for any risk group, of 141+/-13/82+/-8 mm Hg. Age, smoking, gender, hypercholesterolemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, and existing atherosclerosis had little (<1 mm Hg) or no influence on BP at the end of titration, but all except smoking slightly reduced the initial response of either systolic or diastolic BP. Patients with isolated systolic hypertension were slightly more responsive than average to treatment. Our findings suggest that in patients at high absolute risk of cardiovascular complications from hypertension, the risk factors themselves do not prevent the recommended BP targets from being achieved.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Safety of the combination of valsartan and benazepril in patients with chronic renal disease. European Group for the Investigation of Valsartan in Chronic Renal Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Several experimental and clinical studies indicate that the renin system may play a pivotal role in progressing renal disease. The combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker could provide a higher degree of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system than either agent alone. Such enhanced suppression might be of benefit for patients exhibiting a progressive decline in renal function because of chronic renal disease. METHODS: A pilot multinational, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel group open-label study has been conducted in a group of patients with progressive chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance 20-45 ml/min) either with or without proteinuria and hypertension. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the safety and tolerability of the combination of valsartan and benazepril. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received valsartan 160 mg once daily (n = 22); group 2 received valsartan 80 mg once daily plus benazepril 5 or 10 mg once daily (n = 42); group 3 received valsartan 160 mg once daily plus benazepril 5 or 10 mg once daily (n = 44). The study lasted for 5 weeks, and in groups 2 and 3 benazepril was added on top of valsartan after the first week of therapy with the angiotensin receptor blocker. RESULTS: Serum creatinine increased in all three groups (mean change within a group: 11 micromol/l in group 1, P= 0.045; 9 micromol/l in group 2, P= 0.030; 15 micromol/l in group 3, P= 0.0006). Serum potassium also increased in all three groups of patients (mean change within a group: 0.28 mmol/l in group 1, P= 0.28; 0.48 mmol/l in group 2, P= 0.0008; 0.36 mmol/l in group 3, P= 0.02). After 5 weeks of treatment, the largest decrease in blood pressure was observed in group 3 (the mean change from baseline in seated diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) and seated systolic blood pressure (SSBP), respectively, were: -2.0 and -11.5 mmHg in group 1; -7.6 and -15.4 mmHg in group 2; -12.6 and -21.6 mmHg in group 3). In addition, both combination treatments resulted in the reduction of proteinuria. The total number of patients with adverse experiences were 10 (45.5%), 14 (33.3%) and 11 (25%) in groups 1,2 and 3, respectively. In six patients (5.6%) therapy was discontinued as a result of adverse experiences. Only one patient in each of the combined therapy groups withdrew from the study because of hyperkalaemia and no patients were forced to withdraw because of an increase in serum creatinine, acute renal failure or hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that short-term combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker is safe and well tolerated in patients with moderate chronic renal failure.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

[Spanish contribution to the HOT (Hypertension Optimal Treatment) study. Final results. Spanish Investigators in the HOT study].

BACKGROUND: The HOT study is a multicenter international trial which included 19,193 patients and whose goal was to assess the optimal target diastolic blood pressure to achieve by antihypertensive treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited in 26 countries. Spain contributed with 806 patients (4.3%) who were randomized to achieve three target DBP: < or = 90; < or = 85; and < or = 80 mmHg, respectively. Baseline characteristics, blood pressure achieved by treatment and cardiovascular events are described and compared with the whole HOT sample. RESULTS: Mean age of the 806 Spanish patients was 61.9 +/- 7.3 years (range 50-80), 58.2% being women. About 55.6% were on pharmacological antihypertensive treatment and not controlled at inclusion. There were significant differences in gender, higher number of females (p > 0.001), less prevalence of tobacco consumption (p = 0.014), and a fewer number of patients with angina (p > 0.001) and myocardial infarction (p > 0.04) between the Spanish sample and the whole HOT population. The percentage of patients reaching the randomized target blood pressure was 76.5% at the end of the study. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction was 28.5 mmHg, and 23 mmHg respectively. The average number of drugs required per patient was 1.7 (57.6% needed two or more antihypertensive drugs) and the number of cardiovascular events in the Spanish population was 40 (4.96%), a similar incidence to the observed (687 events) in the whole study population (3.65%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Strategies of intensive treatment with current antihypertensive drugs are capable to achieve blood pressure control in the great majority of Spanish essential hypertensive patients without significant side effects, thus being responsible for a very low rate of cardiovascular events in these patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Induction of microalbuminuria by l-arginine infusion in healthy individuals: an insight into the mechanisms of proteinuria.

Despite evidence from individuals with diabetes mellitus or reduced renal mass, the actual relationship between protein- or amino acid-induced changes in renal function and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) is largely unknown in subjects without renal disease. In humans, infusions of l-arginine have been used recently in vascular and renal pathophysiological studies. The present study was undertaken to analyze the mechanisms involved in a particular effect; namely, the behavior of UAE during amino acid loading. A prospective interventional protocol was performed on 10 healthy adults by means of an intravenous infusion of l-arginine. The main results show that l-arginine induced a significant increase in UAE from 13.1 +/- 3.8 before to 53.3 +/- 11.1 microgram/min after the infusion (P < 0.005). This increment was simultaneous to an increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF). Furthermore, l-arginine markedly increased the urinary excretion of beta2-microglobulin. UAE correlated significantly with GFR (r = 0. 738; P = 0.014) and RPF (r = 0.942; P < 0.0001), but not with urinary beta2-microglobulin (r = 0.05; P = not significant). Furthermore, marked differences (P = 0.001) were found between the percentage of increase in UAE (306.8% +/- 163.2%) with respect to either albumin filtered load (FLAlb; 57.9% +/- 16.3%) and beta2-microglobulin excretion (1,088.5% +/- 424.6%). No changes were found in vehicle-infused individuals. In conclusion, the present study shows, in controlled conditions, that l-arginine infusion induces a relevant increase in UAE in healthy individuals that significantly exceeds that expected from the increase in GFR alone. The intense and simultaneous increment in beta2-microglobulin excretion strongly suggests that the effect of l-arginine on UAE is, in a relevant part, mediated through a blockade in the tubular protein reabsorption pathways. However, the profound differences observed in the changes induced by l-arginine on UAE and beta2-microglobulin excretion and the differences in the correlation of UAE and beta2-microglobulin with respect to GFR suggest that substantial diversity exists in the mechanisms by which l-arginine affects the renal management of albumin and beta2-microglobulin. These findings are relevant for understanding the renal response to l-arginine and protein/amino acid loads.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Differential effects of losartan and doxazosin on vascular function in senescent spontaneously hypertensive rats.

We evaluated the effects of treatment for 12 weeks with 10 mg/kg/day of either losartan or doxazosin on vascular function in senescent spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR). Both doxazosin and losartan reduced blood pressure, although the former was more effective. In contrast, both drugs reduced relative aortic weight and increased plasma nitrates to a similar extent. Losartan, but not doxazosin, increased the magnitude of the response to acetylcholine (10(-9) to 10(-5) mol/L). Both treatments increased relaxations to sodium nitroprusside (10(-10) to 10(-6) mol/L). These data show that losartan may possess advantages over doxazosin in improving vascular function in senescent SHR. This report emphasizes the importance of angiotensin II in vascular function alterations induced by aging in SHR.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1999

Hyperkalemia in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: involvement of a systemic mechanism.

BACKGROUND: The appearance of hyperkalemia has been described in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients treated with drugs with amiloride-like properties. Recent in vitro data suggest that individuals infected with HIV have alterations in transcellular K+ transport. METHODS: With the objective of examining the presence of alterations in transmembrane K+ equilibrium in HIV-positive patients, we designed a prospective, interventional study involving 10 HIV-positive individuals and 10 healthy controls, all with normal renal function. An infusion of L-arginine (6%, intravenously, in four 30-min periods at 50, 100, 200, and 300 ml/hr) was administered, and plasma and urine electrolytes, creatinine, pH and osmolality, total and fractional sodium and potassium excretion, transtubular potassium gradient, plasma insulin, renin, aldosterone, and cortisol were measured. RESULTS: A primary disturbance consisting of a significant rise in plasma [K+] induced by L-arginine was detected in only the HIV patients but not in the controls (P < 0.001 between groups). A K+ redistribution origin of the hyperkalemia was supported by its rapid development (within 60 min) and the lack of significant differences between HIV-positive individuals and controls in the amount of K+ excreted in the urine. The fact that the HIV-positive individuals had an inhibited aldosterone response to the increase in plasma K+ suggested a putative mechanism for the deranged K+ response. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal that HIV-infected individuals have a significant abnormality in systemic K+ equilibrium. This abnormality, which leads to the development of hyperkalemia after the L-arginine challenge, may be related, in part, to a failure in the aldosterone response to hyperkalemia. These results provide a new basis for understanding the pathogenesis of hyperkalemia in HIV individuals, and demonstrate that the risk of HIV-associated hyperkalemia exists even in the absence of amiloride-mimicking drugs or overt hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism.

Adult↗