PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Nikolajsen

Publications and source records attributed to L Nikolajsen.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

[Phantom pain after amputation of extremities].

Phantom pain is experienced by about 70% of patients following limb amputation. In most patients, both the frequency and the intensity of pain attacks diminish with time, but severe pain persists in about 5-10%. The mechanisms underlying pain in amputees are not fully understood, but factors in both the peripheral and central nervous system play a role. Pain before the amputation seems to increase the risk of phantom pain, but the relation is not simple. Treatment of phantom pain is not successful; a recent study on prevention of the pain with a preoperative epidural blockade showed negative results. The future may reveal new specific drugs for treatment.

Amputation Stumps↗

Has basic research contributed to chronic pain treatment?

Our understanding of nociceptive processing and of plastic changes after persistent noxious input has increased immensely within the last two decades. It is now clear that long-lasting noxious stimulation or damage to the nervous system give rise to a neuronal hyperexcitability and that this sensitisation of the nervous system plays an important role for development and maintenance of chronic pain. The manifestations of such hyperexcitability are numerous and include among others: increased neuronal response to a suprathreshold stimulus, expansion of the peripheral areas from where a central neurone can be activated and the recruitment of previous non-responding nociceptive neurones. Furthermore, it has been possible to modulate this neuronal hyperexcitability by the discovery of molecular targets for pain, by sequencing DNA of ion channels and receptors and by development of new molecules that exert their effects on these molecular targets. The changes in responsiveness appear to be partly time and intensity dependent and partly dependent on the cause of injury. Whereas relatively short-lasting and moderate noxious input leads to reversible plastic changes, more intense and long-lasting noxious stimulation implies a risk for persistent and more profound alterations in transmitters, receptors, ion channels and in neuronal connectivity. Despite the explosion of new knowledge in pain processing and in molecular background for neuroplasticity, this progress has unfortunately not resulted in a corresponding improvement of our ability to treat chronic pain. The number of patients with chronic unrelieved pain is still high and newer types of treatment have so far not resulted in a substantially better treatment. Nevertheless, there is now an ongoing systematic research in which chronic pain conditions are assessed in a fashion so that mechanisms underlying pain can be dissected. Moreover, controlled clinical trials together with systematic reviews are carried out which in the future should permit formulation of treatment algorithms for chronic pain. Finally, it is likely that the development of new specific types of treatment will show efficacy if they are evaluated and analysed not on the global pain experience, but more specifically on those targets and elements of the pain experience they are aimed to deal with.

Animals↗

Phantom limb pain.

Phantom pain is experienced by 60% to 80% of patients following limb amputation but is only severe in about 5% to 10% of cases. The mechanisms underlying pain in amputees are not fully understood, but factors in both the peripheral and central nervous system play a role. Treatment of phantom pain is not successful; a recent study on prevention of phantom pain showed negative results. The future may reveal new specific drugs for treatment.

Humans↗

Relationship between mechanical sensitivity and postamputation pain: a prospective study.

Limb amputation is followed by stump and phantom pain in a large proportion of amputees and postamputation pain may be associated with signs of hyperexcitability such as hyperalgesia to mechanical stimulation. The present study examined the possible relationship between mechanical pain threshold of the limb and early (after 1 week) and late (after 6 months) phantom pain. Thirty-five patients scheduled for amputation of the lower limb were examined before, 1 week and 6 months after amputation. On all three examination days pressure-pain thresholds were measured and compared with the simultaneous recording of ongoing pain intensity assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS). There was a weak but significant inverse relationship between preamputation thresholds and early stump and phantom pain. There was no relationship between preamputation thresholds and late stump and phantom pain. One week after amputation there was a significant and inverse relationship between mechanical thresholds and phantom pain but no relationship was found after 6 months. The findings suggest that although tenderness of the limb before and after amputation is related to early stump and phantom pain, the relationship is weak. Neuronal sensitization peripherally or centrally may play a role in the development of phantom pain.

Aged↗

Memantine (a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist) in the treatment of neuropathic pain after amputation or surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study.

UNLABELLED: Evidence has accumulated that the N:-methyl-D-aspartate receptor system plays a role in continuous and particularly, in stimulus-evoked pain after nerve injury. We examined, in a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over fashion, the analgesic effect of memantine (a N:-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist) in a group of patients with chronic pain after surgery. We randomized 19 patients to receive either memantine or placebo in the first 5-wk treatment period. A washout period of 4 wks was followed by another 5-wk treatment period with the opposite drug. The dosage of drug was increased from 5 to 20 mg/d. Pain was recorded daily, with the use of a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Before and at the end of each treatment period, pain and sensitivity were also assessed by using the McGill Pain Questionnaire, allodynia to touch, brush and cold, wind-up-like pain, and thresholds to mechanical stimuli (pressure and von Frey hair). A total of 15 patients (12 amputees and three patients with other nerve injuries) completed the study. There was no difference between memantine and placebo on any of the outcome measures. We conclude that memantine at a dosage of 20 mg/d does not reduce spontaneous or evoked pain in patients with nerve injury pain. IMPLICATIONS: In a randomized, double-blinded and cross-over study, the analgesic effect of memantine (a drug which reduces the excitability of sensitized neurons in the dorsal horn) was examined in 19 patients with chronic pain after nerve injury.

Adult↗

Effect of preoperative extradural bupivacaine and morphine on stump sensation in lower limb amputees.

We have examined the effect of preoperative extradural bupivacaine and morphine on postoperative stump sensation in 31 patients undergoing amputation of the lower limb in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups: group 1 received extradural 0.25% bupivacaine 4-7 ml h-1 and morphine 0.16-0.28 ml h-1 before and during operation; group 2 received extradural saline before and during amputation and conventional analgesics for pain treatment. All patients received general anaesthesia for the amputation and extradural bupivacaine and morphine after operation. Sensory examination of the limb/stump was carried out before amputation, and after 1 week and 6 months. The following were measured: pressure pain thresholds (pressure algometry), touch and pain detection thresholds (von Frey hairs), thermal sensibility (thermal rolls), and allodynia and wind-up-like pain. There were no differences between the two groups at any of the postoperative assessments for mechanical and thermal sensibility or rate of allodynia and wind-up-like pain. Our study suggests that preoperative and intraoperative extradural block had no long-term prophylactic effect on hyperalgesia, allodynia or wind-up-like pain.

Adult↗

Effect of i.v. ketamine in combination with epidural bupivacaine or epidural morphine on postoperative pain and wound tenderness after renal surgery.

We studied 60 patients undergoing operation on the kidney with combined general and epidural anaesthesia, in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Patients were allocated to receive a preoperative bolus dose of ketamine 10 mg i.v., followed by an i.v. infusion of ketamine 10 mg h-1 for 48 h after operation, or placebo. During the first 24 h after surgery, all patients received 4 ml h-1 of epidural bupivacaine 2.5 mg ml-1. From 24 to 48 h after operation, patients received epidural morphine 0.2 mg h-1 preceded by a bolus dose of 2 mg. In addition, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. morphine (2.5 mg, lockout time 15 min) was offered from 0 to 48 h after operation. Patients who received ketamine felt significantly more sedated at 0-24 h, but not at 24-48 h after operation, compared with patients who received placebo (P = 0.002 and P = 0.127, respectively). There were no significant differences in pain (VAS) at rest, during mobilization or cough, PCA morphine consumption, sensory block to pinprick, pressure pain detection threshold assessed with an algometer, touch and pain detection thresholds assessed with von Frey hairs, peak flow or side effects other than sedation. The power of detecting a reduction in VAS scores of 20 mm in our study was 80% at the 5% significance level. We conclude that we were unable to demonstrate an (additive) analgesic or opioid sparing effect of ketamine 10 mg h-1 i.v. combined with epidural bupivacaine at 0-24 h, or epidural morphine at 24-48 h after renal surgery.

Adult↗

Randomised trial of epidural bupivacaine and morphine in prevention of stump and phantom pain in lower-limb amputation.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia before limb amputation is commonly used to reduce postamputation pain. But there have been no controlled studies with large numbers of patients to prove such a pre-emptive effect. We investigated whether postamputation stump and phantom pain in the first year is reduced by preoperative epidural blockade with bupivacaine and morphine. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind trial, 60 patients scheduled for lower-limb amputation were randomly assigned epidural bupivacaine (0.25% 4-7 mL/h) and morphine (0.16-0.28 mg/h) for 18 h before and during the operation (29 patients; blockade group) or epidural saline (4-7 mL/h) and oral or intramuscular morphine (31 patients; control group). All patients had general anaesthesia for the amputation and were asked about stump and phantom pain after 1 week and then after 3, 6, and 12 months by two independent examiners. Study endpoints were rate of stump and phantom pain, intensity of stump and phantom pain, and consumption of opioids. FINDINGS: Two patients in each group were withdrawn before amputation. The groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. Median duration of preoperative saline treatment was 18.5 h (IQR 17-20). Median duration of preoperative epidural blockade in the blockade group was 18 h (15-20.3). The combined median duration of postoperative epidural pain treatment in both groups was 166 h (89.3-308.3). After 1 week, 14 (52%) patients in the blockade group and 15 (56%) in the control group had phantom pain (95% CI - 30.6 to 22.7, p = 0.9). The figures for blockade versus control group were: 14 (82%) vs ten (50%; 4.0 to 60.8, p = 0.09) at 3 months; 13 (81%) vs 11 (55%; -2.7 to 55.3, p = 0.2) at 6 months; and nine (75%) vs 11 (69%; -27.0 to 39.6, p = 1.0) at 12 months. Intensity of stump and phantom pain and consumption of opioids were similar in both groups at all four postoperative interviews. INTERPRETATION: Perioperative epidural blockade started a median of 18 h (15-20.3) before the amputation and continued into the postoperative period does not prevent phantom or stump pain.

Analgesia, Epidural↗

The influence of preamputation pain on postamputation stump and phantom pain.

The significance of preamputation pain for the development of postamputation stump and phantom pain has been discussed over the years and is still a matter of dispute. It has been argued that preamputation pain increases the risk of phantom pain and that phantom pain is a revivification of pain experienced before the amputation. The purpose of this prospective study was to clarify the relation between preamputation pain and phantom pain. Fifty-six patients scheduled for amputation of a lower limb were interviewed the day before the amputation about preamputation pain and about stump and phantom pain 1 week, 3 and 6 months after the amputation. Pain was quantitated and described using a visual analogue scale (VAS), 10 different word descriptors, the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and the patients' own words. If phantom pain was present patients were asked if the pain was similar to any pain experienced before the amputation. At each postoperative interview patients were asked to recall preamputation pain intensity. Location of pain and analgesic requirements were registered. Preamputation pain significantly increased the incidence of stump pain (P = 0.04) and phantom pain (P = 0.04) after 1 week and the incidence of phantom pain after 3 months (P = 0.03). About 42% of the patients reported that their phantom pain resembled the pain they had experienced at the time of the amputation. However, there was no relation between the patients' own opinion about similarity between preamputation pain and phantom pain and the actual similarity found when comparing pre- and postoperative recordings of pain. Patients significantly overestimated preamputation pain intensity after 6 months.

Adult↗

Oral ketamine therapy in the treatment of postamputation stump pain.

BACKGROUND: Hyperactivity of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors may be one of the factors in the maintenance of postamputation stump pain. CASE REPORT: Ketamine-a clinical available NMDA receptor antagonist-was administered intravenously to a patient with established stump pain in a double-blind saline-controlled fashion. Following infusion stump pain was alleviated for 31 hours. Ketamine reduced the allodynic area and wind-up-like pain and increased pressure-pain thresholds. Treatment was started with ketamine 50 mg x 4 per day dissolved in juice. No side effects or development of tolerance were observed during a 3-month treatment period. CONCLUSION: NMDA receptor antagonists may have a potential in the treatment of neuropathic pain, including stump pain.

Administration, Oral↗

[Fasting times, ventricular aspiration and use of antacids and H2 blockaders at Danish departments of anesthesiology].

In a questionnaire sent to 58 anaesthetic departments in Denmark (1992/93), we assessed fasting guidelines, preoperative gastric emptying and the use of pharmacological aspiration prophylaxis. Replies were obtained from 51 departments (88%). Most departments (90%) fast adults for at least six hours prior to elective surgery. However, 14 departments (27%) plan to change their guidelines to allow the intake of clear liquid on the day of surgery. Eighteen departments (35%) hardly ever use preoperative gastric emptying prior to emergency surgery. The other departments differ as to when gastric emptying should be performed. Only few departments (25%) employ pharmacological prophylaxis.

Adolescent↗

Effect of previous frequency of headache, duration of fasting and caffeine abstinence on perioperative headache.

We have examined the relationship between perioperative headache and various factors in 219 patients who fasted from midnight and underwent minor surgery under general anaesthesia. Four to six hours after operation all patients completed a questionnaire on previous frequency of headache, daily consumption of caffeine and occurrence of perioperative headache. The duration of fasting, type of surgery, premedication and anaesthetic agents used were obtained from the anaesthetic record. After multivariate logistic regression analysis a significant risk of preoperative headache was found in patients who normally experienced headache more than twice a month (odds ratio (OR): 7.7; confidence interval (CI): 2.9-20.1), had a daily caffeine consumption > 400 mg/24 h (OR: 5.0; CI: 1.6-14.8) and who were anaesthetized after 12:00 (OR: 3.7; CI: 1.4-9.8). The risk of postoperative headache was significantly greater in patients with preoperative headache (OR: 16.9; CI: 6.5-43.8), daily caffeine consumption > 400 mg/24 h (OR: 3.9; CI: 1.5-9.6) and in those patients who received atracurium, which was similar to the risk of tracheal intubation.

Adolescent↗

Sore throat after endotracheal intubation.

Nitrous oxide can diffuse into the cuff of an endotracheal tube during tracheal intubation, and the cuff pressure against the tracheal wall may cause mucosal damage. An endotracheal tube has been developed (Brandt Anesthesia Tube) that effectively limits nitrous oxide-related intracuff pressure increases. We determined whether the incidence of postoperative sore throat could be reduced by using this tube. Forty-eight female patients, 18-50 yr of age, were included in the study. Endotracheal intubation was performed with either a Brandt Anesthesia Tube or a Mallinckrodt endotracheal tube. All patients were interviewed postoperatively after 20-30 h by individuals who did not know which tube was used. In the Mallinckrodt group, 12 of 20 patients had a sore throat and 10 patients had intracuff pressures greater than 25 mm Hg. Only 3 of 20 patients in the Brandt group had a sore throat. We found that the incidence of sore throats after intubation could be significantly reduced by using the Brandt Anesthesia Tube (P less than 0.005).

Adolescent↗

[Capnometry. Technique and clinical use in anesthesia and emergency medicine].

By capnometry is understood measurement of carbon dioxide in the expiratory air. The concentration can be determined by various forms of spectometry. A new acoustic principle of measurement is more sensitive than the methods hitherto employed. Capnometry registers rapid intubation of the oesophagus. Sudden changes in expired carbon dioxide may be signs of malignant hyperthermia or pulmonary embolism. In addition, capnometry is a valuable aid in the regulation of mechanical ventilation. Recent investigations suggest that capnometry can be employed to confirm or refute clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and that measurement of expired carbon dioxide may be of prognostic value in resuscitation. It has not yet be elucidated whether nasal measurements in patients who are not intubated can provide reliable values.

Anesthesia↗