PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L O Amusa

Publications and source records attributed to L O Amusa.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Grip strength: effects of testing posture and elbow position.

This study was designed to determine the effect of testing posture and elbow position on grip strength. A hand dynamometer was used to measure the grip strength of 61 subjects (26 female and 35 male) in four positions: (1) sitting with elbow in 90 degree flexion, (2) sitting with elbow in full extension, (3) standing with elbow in 90 degree flexion, and (4) standing with elbow in full extension. The four experimental conditions were randomized, and standardized instructions were followed. A two-factor (gender and treatment) repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine any significant difference in grip strength between the sexes and the experimental (treatment) conditions. The result of the ANOVA revealed a significant F-ratio for gender and treatment main effects. Scheffé post hoc analysis revealed that males had higher (p less than .01) grip strength than females at all the testing postures and elbow joint angles, and that there was a significant (p less than .05) difference between the grip strength measured in subjects sitting with the elbow in 90 degree flexion and standing with the elbow in full extension. The findings suggest the need for clinicians to maintain standard testing conditions while measuring grip strength.

Adolescent↗

Factors affecting Caltrac and Calcount accelerometer output.

This investigation determined the effects of different trunk levels and walking speeds on the output of two physical activity monitoring devices--the Caltrac and the Calcount. Twenty healthy subjects walked on a level motor-driven treadmill at two walking speeds (2 and 4 mph) with the accelerometer affixed to different trunk locations (waist belt and chest line). After each five-minute exercise bout, the accelerometer readings (in arbitrary units) were recorded and expressed in counts per minute. The analysis of variance for the Calcount accelerometer data revealed a significant main effect for location and speed. The Caltrac accelerometer data revealed a significant F ratio for the speed main effect and the location x speed interaction effect. Overall, the accelerometer reading when worn at the waist belt was higher (p less than .05) than when affixed to the chest line. For both accelerometers, the output increased with increased walking speed. The correlation between the Caltrac and Calcount accelerometer readings ranged from -.09 to .49, indicating that the output of the two accelerometers cannot be compared directly.

Adult↗