PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Palazzo

Publications and source records attributed to L Palazzo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP.

An accurate and safe preoperative method of imaging the common bile duct is essential for the proper diagnosis of calculous biliary tract disease, especially in the current era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The value of endoscopic ultrasonography in detecting common duct stones has been reported, albeit in small series. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the accuracy of EUS in a large series of patients. We compared EUS to direct cholangiography in the evaluation of 422 patients for common duct stones. Ductal stones were imaged by EUS in 168 patients (43.4%). No complications were encountered. EUS failed in 2.3% of cases, ERCP failed in 8.3%, and surgical exploration failed in 0.5%. Comparison of EUS with surgical exploration in 185 patients showed a sensitivity of 94.9%, a specificity of 97.8%, and an accuracy of 95.9%. EUS was compared to ERCP in 219 patients. All common duct stones found by ERCP were evident by EUS. Concordance was obtained in 91.3% of cases. Review of videotapes disclosed 3 false-positives and 16 unequivocal true-positives. We conclude that EUS is a safe and highly accurate means of detecting common duct stones and should be proposed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients at risk of choledocholithiasis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Interobserver variation in tumor staging.

Interobserver agreement in cardioesophageal and rectal tumor evaluation is generally good, especially for uT1 and uT4 tumors. Diagnosis of a uT2 tumor is difficult and results in poor agreement. However, the proportion of agreement is satisfactory for distinguishing tumors that invade the mediastinal or the perirectal fat from those that do not, a situation that may be the most relevant from a therapeutic point of view. In cases of cardioesophageal tumor, agreement for metastatic LN is lower and depends on the sites involved, with the best agreement for intra-abdominal LN, which may indicate a worse prognosis. Lack of agreement in EUS images can be avoided by precise manipulation of the echoendoscope in the upper part of the mediastinum and by improving training and the definitions regarding EUS.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed1994

[Digestive echo-endoscopy].

Since its introduction into clinical practice in 1980, echo-endoscopy has greatly contributed to improving our capacity to image the digestive tract and now plays a major role in management of digestive tract diseases. Echo-endoscopy is a second intention technique reserved for further investigation of lesions previously identified by endoscopy or other imaging techniques. All five layers of the wall and surroundings of the accessible structures (oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, rectum and colon) can be visualized. Evaluation of locoregional extension of cancer invasion is one of the predominant indications. For example, since the prognosis of tumours of the oesophagus are directly related to parietal and lymph node extension, echo-endoscopy would be indicated to precisely determine the tumoural stage and thus help in adapting therapeutic management. Today, it is generally accepted that echo-endoscopy is superior to computed tomography for staging tumours of the oesophagus and the cardia. For gastric and duodenal adenocarcinomas, the performance of echo-endoscopy is similar and can identify more readily superficial lesions accessible for photocoagulation. For adenocarcinoma of the rectum, echo-endoscopy can be used to identify the tumoural stage and local extension and thus help in therapeutic decision making. Other classical indications include the evaluation of submucosal tumefaction and biliopancreatic disorders (biliary lithiasis, pancreatitis, tumours). Thus for certain well-defined indications, echo-endoscopy is now the highest performing imaging technique currently available for lesions of the digestive tract. Operator experience is however a limiting factor, emphasizing the need for clinical training.

Digestive System Diseases↗
PubMed1994

Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a promising procedure for the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis. Accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by ultrasonography and computed tomography were prospectively compared with endoscopic ultrasonography in 62 consecutive patients. METHODS: Final diagnosis was determined by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without sphincterotomy or intraoperative cholangiography with or without choledochoscopy. All of the patients had abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and either an endoscopic retrograde (n = 40) or intraoperative cholangiography (n = 32) performed. RESULTS: Choledocholithiasis was confirmed in 22 patients. Thirteen patients had a stone with a diameter < 1 cm, and 14 had a nonenlarged common bile duct. Endoscopic ultrasonography was more sensitive (97%) than ultrasonography (25%; P < 0.0001) and computed tomography (75%; P < 0.02). Specificity and positive predictive value were not significantly different. Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasonography (97%) was better than that of ultrasonography (56%; P < 0.0001) and computed tomography (78%; P < 0.02). Results were unchanged after six patients in whom the absence of choledocholithiasis was considered probable after follow-up were excluded. Endoscopic ultrasonography results did not depend on stone diameter or common bile duct dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasonography appears to be the best diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis compared with other noninvasive procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Common bile duct stricture as a late complication of upper abdominal radiotherapy.

We report the cases of two patients who developed symptomatic common bile duct stricture 10 years after upper abdominal radiotherapy for malignant lymphoma. Both patients were in complete remission and presented with marked obstructive jaundice. Endosonography was useful in both cases and showed segmental thickening of the bile duct wall narrowing in the lumen. Both patients underwent surgical exploration, confirming biliary obstruction due to intrinsic wall thickening, and had successful biliary drainage by Roux-en-Y hepatico-jejunostomy. Histological examination of the resected bile duct, in one case, and of a bile duct biopsy, in the other, was consistent with late irradiation injury. We conclude that stricture may be a delayed consequence of radiotherapy applied to normal bile ducts.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗
PubMed1994

[Place of ultrasound endoscopy in dysphagia].

Echo-endoscopy is a technique which has been shown to be effective in the staging of cancers of the oesophagus and cardia. It is indicated to guide the therapeutic choice according to the stage of regional extension, which is known to be the main prognostic factor of this disease. Echoendoscopy is a very elegant technique to visualise subepithelial vaulting, which can correspond either to a submucosal tumour, or to extrinsic compression by an adjacent organ or a mediastinal tumour infiltration. Echo-endoscopy can be useful to differentiate idiopathic megaoesophagus from secondary megaoesophagus by visualising a peri-oesophageal infiltration.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1994

[Cystic dystrophy in an antro-duodenal heterotopic antroduodenal pancreas].

The authors report a case of cystic dystrophy in heterotopic pancreas in the absence of disease of the proper pancreas. This case is particular in regard of its association to pancreas divisum, its antro-bulbous localization, and its evolutive character marked by hyperamylasemia, ascite, and sharped inflammatory lesions of resection specimen. The diagnostic usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography is outlined.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was compared to ultrasonography (US) and CT scan (CT) in order to evaluate its role in the diagnosis and the locoregional spread assessment of pancreatic cancer. Sixty-four patients suspected of pancreatic cancer were studied prospectively, and the results of imaging techniques were compared to histology and surgical exploration. There were 49 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 11 of pancreatitis, 2 of common bile duct carcinoma, 1 lymphoma and 1 hepatocellular carcinoma with peripancreatic metastatic lymph nodes. EUS was significantly more accurate (91%) than CT (66%) and US (64%) for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS was able to image all 7 cancers less than 25 mm in diameter, US and CT only one. There were 4 false positives with EUS which were all cases of pseudotumorous pancreatitis. For detecting lymph node involvement, EUS was significantly more sensitive (62%) and accurate (74%) than US (8% and 37%) and CT (19% and 42%), respectively. Invaded lymph nodes adjacent to large tumors and micrometastatic involvement were responsible for this lack of sensitivity. EUS was significantly more sensitive (100%) than CT (71%) and US (17%) for detecting venous involvement. The specificity of EUS was lower (67%) because of duodenal bulb stenosis and large tumors. In conclusion, this prospective and comparative study confirms that EUS is an accurate tool for diagnosis and locoregional spread assessment of pancreatic cancer when performed in a reference center. EUS is of particular interest for small tumours. However, EUS does not enable differentiation of pseudotumorous pancreatitis from adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

Endoscopic ultrasonography in the local staging of primary gastric lymphoma.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopy were prospectively performed and compared to the histopathologic findings of the resection specimens in 24 patients with primary gastric lymphoma (PGL). On EUS, three types of PGL could be differentiated, a superficial type (n = 10), an infiltrating type (n = 12) and a tumorous type (n = 2). In the correct assessment of surface extension of the tumors, endoscopy and EUS agreed in 37.5% of cases and EUS showed more extensive disease than endoscopy in 58% of cases. However, in comparison to the resection specimens, EUS still underestimated the tumor surface extension in 37.5% of cases; this was mainly in low grade malignant PGL. The depth of tumor infiltration was correctly determined on EUS compared to the resection specimens in 91.5% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosing lymph node metastases were 100%, 80% and 83%, respectively. We conclude that EUS is a useful pre-therapeutic staging tool for primary gastric lymphoma but there remain some problems in determining the longitudinal and circular tumor spread in order to accurately guide the extent of gastric resection.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

[Pancreatic endocrine tumors: contribution of ultrasound endoscopy in the diagnosis of localization].

Endoscopic ultrasonography is a new imaging technique which has previously demonstrated its accuracy in localization of small pancreatic cancers. The aim of this retrospective study was to report our experience of this new method for localization of small endocrine tumors of potential pancreatic origin. Thirteen patients with insulinoma and 17 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome were studied. All were imaged in a reference center by ultrasound (US) and CT scan (CT) before endoscopic ultrasonography. Insulinomas: 78.5% of tumors were 15 mm or less in size. The endoscopic ultrasonography was more accurate (79%) than US (7%) and CT (14%) for localization of the 14 tumors removed in the 13 patients who underwent surgery. Gastrinomas: Endoscopic ultrasonography was able to image 7 to the 9 pancreatic gastrinomas, the 2 duodenal gastrinomas, and the 2 gastrinomas located in peripancreatic lymph nodes which were removed in the 9 patients who underwent surgery. US and CT were able to image only one of the two peripancreatic lymph nodes. We concluded that endoscopic ultrasonography is a highly accurate tool for localization of small pancreatic endocrine tumors and should be performed early in the management of these tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

[Ultrasonic endoscopy of superficial epidermoid cancer of the esophagus].

Superficial squamous cell carcinomas of the oesophagus are defined as cancers confined to the mucosa or involving the submucosa but sparing the muscularis mucosae, with or without lymph node extension. Although lymph node involvement is rare (less than 5%) in tumours confined to the mucosa, it is frequent (30 to 45%) in tumours involving the submucosa, which have a prognosis similar to that of the usual obstructive tumours. Endoscopic ultrasonography is the most accurate examination (diagnostic accuracy greater than 95%) to distinguish between superficial and advanced cancers. The absence of visualization of the muscularis mucosae with the currently available transducers limits the decision-making value of such a distinction except in the case of flat tumours in which the absence of ultrasonographically detectable parietal thickening indicates the presence of a cancer confined to the mucosa, with an excellent prognosis.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1992

Localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: After a pancreatic endocrine tumor has been diagnosed on the basis of clinical signs and the results of laboratory tests, localization of the tumor by the usual imaging procedures fails in as many as 40 to 60 percent of patients. Endoscopic ultrasonography, a sensitive test for small carcinomas of the pancreas, might also be useful in patients with endocrine tumors of the pancreas that cannot be localized by conventional methods. METHODS: We studied 37 patients later shown to have 39 endocrine tumors of the pancreas who had negative results on transabdominal ultrasonography and CT. All the patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography, and 22 also underwent selective angiography. All the tumors were confirmed by surgical excision and immunohistologic examination; they consisted of 31 insulinomas, 7 gastrinomas, and 1 glucagonoma, 0.5 to 2.5 cm (mean, 1.4 cm) in diameter. All but one of the patients were cured of their disease, as ascertained by at least six months of clinical and laboratory follow-up. RESULTS: Using endoscopic ultrasonography, we were able to localize 32 of the 39 tumors (sensitivity, 82 percent); no tumor was incorrectly localized. The size of the tumors was very similar (within 2 mm) to that predicted by endoscopic ultrasonography. Among the 22 patients who underwent both angiography and endoscopic ultrasonography, ultrasonography was significantly more sensitive than angiography for tumor localization (sensitivity, 82 percent vs. 27 percent). Among 19 control patients without pancreatic endocrine tumors, endoscopic ultrasonography was negative in 18 (specificity, 95 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a highly sensitive and specific procedure for the localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. It should be considered for the preoperative localization of such tumors once the clinical and laboratory diagnosis has been established.

Adenoma, Islet Cell↗
PubMed1992

Endoscopic ultrasonography in colorectal diseases.

Since new flexible high-frequency ultrasound endoscopes are now available, the use of this technique in colorectal disease has been determined. Its role in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer, and in follow-up after surgery has been established, but its use in cases of anal cancer and in non-neoplastic rectal diseases still has to be demonstrated more precisely.

Anus Neoplasms↗