Recognition of information and coordination of ambulatory care by medical residents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L R Barker.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Competent use of interviewing skills is important for the care of all patients but is especially critical, and frequently deficient, in meeting the needs of patients experiencing emotional distress. This study presents an evaluation of a curriculum in communication and psychosocial skills taught to first-year medical residents. A randomized experimental design compared trained and untrained residents' (n = 48) performances with a simulated patient presenting with atypical chest pain and psychosocial distress. Evaluation was based on analysis of videotapes, simulated patient report of residents' behaviors, and chart notation. Trained compared with untrained residents asked more open-ended questions and fewer leading questions, summarized main points more frequently, did more psychosocial counseling, and were rated as having better communication skills by the simulated patient. The use of more focused and psychosocially directed questions, and fewer leading and grab-bag questions, was associated with more accurate diagnoses and management recorded in the medical chart. However, no significant difference was found in the charting practices of trained versus untrained residents.
This paper provides a foundation for establishing curricula to train medical residents in ambulatory care. To do so, it first presents reasons that curricula are needed in this area. It then delineates attitudes and proficiencies (knowledge and skills) that such curricula should be designed to instill. Finally, it briefly discusses implications for curriculum development. Extensive tables are provided, including detailed lists of generic proficiencies that residents should attain. Among realms in which these proficiencies lie are organizing the ambulatory care encounter, using interpersonal skills, gathering information through physical examination and other means, obtaining and employing clinically useful knowledge, documenting the encounter, and planning and coordinating care. The paper notes that planning for the discharge of patients from the hospital can contribute to obtaining proficiencies important in ambulatory care.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a process whereby a faculty-resident committee annually audits outpatient record keeping and preventive care practices and provides feedback to resident physicians. DESIGN: Pre- and postfeedback audits with interventions and observations repeated over six consecutive academic years. SETTING: The adult primary care practice of housestaff in a university-affiliated hospital. SUBJECTS: All 139 physicians in an internal medicine residency program from 1981-82 through 1986-87, of whom 37 were present for three consecutive years. INTERVENTION: Each year, residents were given individualized, detailed, typewritten feedback based on audits of their outpatient records. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each resident physician had a minimum of four (mean 5.2) outpatient records per year audited against standards for record-keeping practices and the provision of preventive care. Overall performance scores for each resident audit improved from a mean of 39.7 +/- 12.3 (SD) in 1981-82 to a mean of 58.5 +/- 14.1 (SD) in 1986-87 (possible range 0 to 100, observed range 9.4 to 86.6). The overall performance scores of individual residents, who received two cycles of feedback, improved an average of 11.5 (95% confidence limits 7.6, 15.3), from a mean of 48.4 +/- 11.4 (SD) during their first year of residency to 59.8 +/- 13.9 (SD) during their third year. General (primary care) and traditional-track residents improved at similar rates, although mean performance scores were consistently higher for general than for traditional-track residents. Analysis of variance revealed that all changes and differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: An ongoing chart audit and feedback system can be associated with improvements both in the performance of individual residents and in the long-term performance of a residency program.