PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L R Petersen

Publications and source records attributed to L R Petersen.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Estimated risk of transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus by screened blood in the United States.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by blood transfusion occurs almost exclusively when a recently infected blood donor is infectious but before antibodies to HIV become detectable (during the "window period"). We estimated the risk of HIV transmission caused by transfusion on the basis of the window period associated with the use of current, sensitive enzyme immunosorbent assays and recent data on HIV incidence among blood donors. METHODS: We analyzed demographic and laboratory data on more than 4.1 million blood donations obtained in 1992 and 1993 in 19 regions served by the American National Red Cross, as well as the results of HIV-antibody tests of 4.9 million donations obtained in an additional 23 regions. RESULTS: We estimated that, in the 19 study regions, 1 donation in every 360,000 (95 percent confidence interval, 210,000 to 1,140,000) was made during the window period. In addition, it is estimated that 1 in 2,600,000 donations was HIV-seropositive but was not identified as such because of an error in the laboratory. We estimated that 15 to 42 percent of window-period donations were discarded because they were seropositive on laboratory tests other than the HIV-antibody test. When these results were extrapolated to include the additional 23 Red Cross service regions, there was a risk of one case of HIV transmission for every 450,000 to 660,000 donations of screened blood. If the Red Cross centers are assumed to be representative of all U.S. blood centers, among the 12 million donations collected nationally each year an estimated 18 to 27 infectious donations are available for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated risk of transmitting HIV by the transfusion of screened blood is very small and nearly half that estimated previously, primarily because the sensitivity of enzyme immunosorbent assays has been improved.

Blood Banks↗
PubMed1995

Trends in HIV seroprevalence among persons attending sexually transmitted disease clinics in the United States, 1988-1992.

Trends in seroprevalence of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were examined among patients attending sentinel clinics for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) throughout the United States. Cross-sectional, unlinked (blinded) surveys of HIV seroprevalence were conducted annually within clinics in 40 metropolitan areas. From 1988 to 1992, 552,665 specimens were tested in 80 STD clinics. The overall HIV seroprevalence was 33% (range among metropolitan areas: 5-52%) among gay and bisexual men, 3% (range: 0.3-11%) among heterosexual men, 2% (range: 0.1-11%) among women, and 10% (range: 0.5-45%) among heterosexual injecting drug users (IDUs). Controlling for clinic, age, and race/ethnicity, HIV seroprevalence decreased among all gay and bisexual men, but especially among white gay and bisexual men from 32% in 1989 to 22% in 1992. Among heterosexual men and women, HIV seroprevalence decreased among whites and, to a lesser degree, Hispanics, but remained essentially stable among African-Americans over time. Among heterosexual IDUs, seroprevalence was also unchanged. These results reflect changes in the HIV epidemic, which is becoming increasingly characterized by infected heterosexuals and IDUs, especially within minority populations.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1995

Time course of detection of viral and serologic markers preceding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 seroconversion: implications for screening of blood and tissue donors.

BACKGROUND: Almost all human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission via blood or tissues that has occurred since anti-HIV screening was implemented in 1985 is traceable to blood given after infection but before antibody seroconversion, a time that is referred to as the window period. In this study, the performance of newer assays designed to detect viral and serologic markers soon after infection is assessed, and the reduction in the window period achieved by these assays is estimated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Three cohort studies of persons at high risk for acquiring HIV infection were identified. These studies included well-controlled HIV type 1 (HIV-1) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of serial preseroconversion specimens from HIV-1-seroconverting homosexual men or intravenous drug users. Of 81 enrollees with anti-HIV-1 seroconversion documented by a viral lysate anti-HIV-1 enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) available in 1989, 13 (16%) had PCR-positive preseroconversion specimens. In the present study, sera from these 13 PCR-positive samples were further tested for anti-HIV by 10 contemporary EIAs and 6 supplemental assays, as well as being tested for plasma p24 antigen and HIV-1 RNA. Preseroconversion sera from 38 HIV-1 DNA PCR-negative cohort participants were also tested by selected anti-HIV EIAs and tested for p24 antigen and HIV-1 RNA. On the basis of these laboratory data and the intervals between blood drawing in all 81 men, the reduction in the preseroconversion window period achieved by these new assays was estimated with a mathematical model developed to analyze seroconversion data. RESULTS: Nine (69%) of the 13 preseroconversion PCR-positive samples had anti-HIV that was detectable by one or more contemporary anti-HIV-1 or anti-HIV type 2 EIA. Supplemental antibody assays were negative on all four EIA-nonreactive preseroconversion samples and negative or indeterminate on a high proportion of the nine EIA-reactive PCR-positive samples. Eight (61%) of the 13 samples were p24 antigen-positive, and 11 (85%) were HIV-1 RNA-positive. The estimated reductions in the window period (relative to the index viral lysate-based anti-HIV EIA) were as follows: contemporary anti-HIV-1/2 EIAs, 20.3 days (95% Cl, 8.0-32.5); p24 antigen and DNA PCR, 26.4 days (95% Cl, 12.6-38.7); and RNA PCR, 31.0 days (95% Cl, 16.7-45.3). CONCLUSION: Recent improvement in the sensitivity of anti-HIV assays has resulted in significant shortening of the preseroconversion window period. Consequently, the incremental reduction in the window period that could be achieved by implementing direct virus-detection assays has diminished significantly.

Blood Donors↗
PubMed1994

Human immunodeficiency virus infection among health care workers who donate blood.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among health care workers who donate blood. DESIGN: Point prevalence survey of blood donors. SETTING: 20 U.S. blood centers that participate in an ongoing interview study of HIV-seropositive blood donors. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence rates for HIV in persons who reported being health care workers were measured directly for 6 of the 20 blood centers. For the other 14 centers, we derived the numerator from the interview study in the same manner used for the 6 centers; we estimated the denominator using blood collection logs at those centers and extrapolations from the survey completed at the 6 blood centers. RESULTS: Between March 1990 and August 1991, 8519 health care workers donated blood at 6 hospitals and other medical facilities. Three persons were HIV seropositive: Two reported being health care workers and having nonoccupational risk factors for HIV infection; the occupation and other possible risk factors of the third seropositive donor could not be determined. Therefore, the highest overall prevalence of HIV infection among health care worker donors at these 6 centers was 0.04% (3 of 8519; upper limit of 95% CI, 0.1%). We estimated that during the same period, approximately 36,329 health care workers were tested for HIV at all 20 centers. Twenty-seven persons infected with HIV who donated at hospitals were identified; 7 did not return for interviews, so their health care occupations could not be verified. Thus, the highest estimated overall prevalence of HIV infection among health care worker donors at the 20 centers was 0.07% (27 of 36,329; upper limit of CI, 0.1%). Of the 20 known health care worker donors, 11 reported nonoccupational risks for HIV infection; 3 of the remaining 9 health care workers described occupational blood exposures that could have resulted in transmission of HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Blood donors can serve as a sentinel cohort when evaluating the risk for occupationally acquired HIV infection. These findings suggest that among the many health care worker donors in this study, HIV infection attributable to occupational exposure was uncommon.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

The effectiveness of the confidential unit exclusion option.

BACKGROUND: The confidential unit exclusion (CUE) option is intended to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission by excluding donors newly infected with HIV who have not yet developed HIV antibody (window-period donors); however, its efficacy in excluding window-period donors has not been evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The use of the CUE option was studied among the donors of 3.7 million units at 18 American Red Cross blood services regions during 1991 and 1992 and among 322 previously HIV-1-seronegative donors who subsequently donated a seropositive unit between 1987 and 1990 at 40 United States blood centers. These seroconverting donors had previously been shown to be highly likely to donate during their window period. RESULTS: On the basis of data from these two populations, it was estimated that only 3 to 5 percent of units donated by window-period donors were not transfused because of the CUE option, that 0.4 percent of all donations were from donors who confidentially excluded their blood from transfusion, and that donors who confidentially excluded their blood were 21 times more likely to be HIV antibody-positive than donors who did not use the CUE option. It is estimated that, if all US blood centers used the CUE option, a total of 2 to 17 otherwise acceptable units donated by window-period donors would not be transfused annually. CONCLUSION: Although donors who confidentially exclude their blood from transfusion are 21 times more likely to have HIV antibody, the rarity of window-period donors and the infrequency of confidential exclusion by window-period donors cause the CUE option to have minimal impact on transfusion safety.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1994

Duration of time from onset of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectiousness to development of detectable antibody. The HIV Seroconversion Study Group.

BACKGROUND: For persons newly infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the time from the onset of infectivity to the development of detectable HIV-1 antibody is unknown. Persons who donate blood during this period account for nearly all instances of HIV-1 transmission from HIV-1 antibody-screened blood transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To estimate the window period from infectivity to HIV-1 antibody positivity, 701 HIV-1-seropositive blood donors who made a previous seronegative donation at 40 United States blood centers were studied. The HIV-1 antibody status was determined for at least one recipient of blood from the seronegative donation preceding the seropositive donation made by 182 of the 701 donors. RESULTS: There were 39 seropositive recipients of blood from these 182 donors. Three donors were excluded from further analysis because the seropositive recipients of their blood had other HIV-1 risk factors or had HIV-1 infection before transfusion. The final study population comprised the remaining 179 donors, of whom 36 (20%) transmitted HIV-1 infection to recipients. When the interval between the seropositive donation and the preceding seronegative donation was less than 180 days, 46 percent of the donors transmitted HIV-1. In contrast, when that interval exceeded 540 days, only 2 percent transmitted HIV-1. A mathematical model was developed to explain the relationship between the probability that the previous seronegative donation occurred during the donor's window period of infectiousness, and hence transmitted HIV-1, as a function of both the window period and the duration between the seropositive and previous seronegative donations. This model indicated that the transmission data were most consistent with an average window period of 45 days. Assuming a log-normal window period distribution, it was estimated with 95 percent certainty that at least 90 percent of persons had a window period of less than 141 days. CONCLUSION: The window period averages 45 days, with few, if any, donors remaining infectious and seronegative for longer than 6 months.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Direct oral questions to blood donors: the impact on screening for human immunodeficiency virus.

BACKGROUND: In December 1990, the Food and Drug Administration recommended that all United States blood centers implement a policy of asking prospective donors direct oral questions (DOQs) about human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk behaviors to increase the safety of the blood supply. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate the impact of the DOQ policy, HIV-related deferral and HIV seroprevalence data were analyzed at four American Red Cross blood centers for the year before the policy change and the year after. An epidemiologic analysis with stratification was conducted, including the calculation of odds ratios (OR) and 95-percent CIs. RESULTS: Two of the four blood centers showed an overall significant increase in HIV-related deferral after implementation of the DOQ policy: OR = 4.04, (95% CI = 3.41, 4.76); OR = 2.93, (95% CI = 2.67, 3.21). The increase in HIV-related deferral was higher for women. HIV seroprevalence decreased at all four centers, including the two that did not see an increase in HIV-related deferrals. Seroprevalence declined by 14 percent in the two centers with increases in HIV-related deferral, which was neither significant nor attributable to DOQs. CONCLUSION: Given that HIV antibody screening cannot detect HIV-seronegative (but infectious) "window-period" donations, the deferral of at-risk donors may offer some additional protection to the blood supply. However, evidence was not found of an increase in safety of the blood supply as measured by HIV seroprevalence.

Blood Banks↗
PubMed1994

Prevalence of antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus among clinical laboratory specimens: findings from a survey of primary care physicians.

To evaluate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection among patients of primary care physicians, we performed anonymous, unlinked HIV-1 antibody testing on leftover blood specimens submitted to 10 large commercial clinical laboratories for complete blood cell count or hematocrit determination, the most commonly ordered diagnostic tests. From January through August 1990, 55,613 specimens submitted by general internists, pediatricians, and family practitioners were sampled; 1,104 (2.0%) had HIV-1 antibody. Seroprevalence among the laboratories varied 50-fold, from 0.3 to 12.4%. The HIV-1 prevalence at each laboratory was not always consistent with the AIDS incidence in the area served by the laboratory. Overall the seroprevalence was almost eight times higher in men (3.9%) than in women (0.5%). Specimens from seropositive persons, especially from men, were unevenly distributed among the physician practices; only three practices submitted approximately 50% of all specimens from seropositive men. These data indicate that a few physicians treat the majority of HIV-1-infected primary care patients. The HIV-1 prevalence among specimens at a clinical laboratory is thus determined by whether few physicians submit specimens to that laboratory. These results could be of use, for instance, in analyzing proposals to mandate physician reporting of HIV-1 infection. The high HIV-1 prevalence among laboratory specimens underscores the potential for exposure to HIV-1-infected blood by clinical laboratory personnel and emphasizes the need for universal precautions for all blood specimens.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Trends in HIV prevalence among disadvantaged youth. Survey results from a national job training program, 1988 through 1992.

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among socially and educationally disadvantaged US youth. DESIGN: Analysis of demographic and geographic trends of HIV infection among Job Corps students from January 1988 through December 1992. SETTING: The Job Corps is a national training program for disadvantaged and out-of-school youth. POPULATION SCREENED: Youths aged 16 to 21 years who entered the Job Corps residential training centers during the survey period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Trends in prevalence of HIV infection among Job Corps students stratified by sex, age, race, and region of the country. RESULTS: Of the 269,956 Job Corps students screened, 812 (0.3%) tested positive for the antibody to HIV type 1. Seroprevalence of HIV for young men decreased from 3.6 per 1000 in 1988 to 2.2 per 1000 in 1992 (chi 2 test for trend, P < .001). Seroprevalence for young women increased from 2.1 per 1000 in 1988 to 4.2 per 1000 in 1990 (P = .001), with seroprevalence remaining stable from 1990 through 1992. The decreasing trends in HIV prevalence among men and increasing trends among women were primarily due to changes in seroprevalence in African-American students. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of HIV infection of three per 1000 is high, given the youth of Job Corps students. The significant rise in HIV rates among female Job Corps students provides evidence of the increasing risk of infection for socioeconomically disadvantaged young women. Reasons for the declining trend in HIV prevalence among male Job Corps students are not clear. Efforts to prevent the spread of HIV infection among adolescents must focus on the group that is hardest to reach--out-of-school and impoverished youth.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Heterosexually acquired human immunodeficiency virus infection and the United States blood supply: considerations for screening of potential blood donors. HIV Blood Donor Study Group.

The impact of heterosexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on the United States blood supply was assessed, and deferral criteria that may exclude potential donors who are at high risk for heterosexually acquired HIV infection were evaluated. Interviews were conducted with 508 HIV-seropositive blood donors from May 1, 1988, to August 31, 1989 (Phase 1), and with 472 donors from January 1, 1990, to May 31, 1991 (Phase 2), at 20 blood centers. From Phase 1 to Phase 2, the overall HIV prevalence decreased from 0.021 to 0.018 percent (p < 0.001). HIV risk factors among HIV-1-seropositive donors were similar during both study phases. Eleven percent of the men and 56 percent of the women reported as their only risk that they had a heterosexual partner who was at increased risk for HIV or was known to have HIV. These percentages were similar during both study periods. During Phase 2, 13 percent of the men and 17 percent of the women with heterosexual transmission risk had a positive serologic test for syphilis, hepatitis B core antibody, or hepatitis C antibody. Among HIV-1-seropositive donors reporting heterosexual risk, the median numbers of previous-year and lifetime sex partners for men were 2 and 30, respectively; for women, those numbers were 1 and 7, respectively. Thirty-one percent of the men and 6 percent of the women reporting heterosexual transmission risk also reported having had syphilis or gonorrhea within 3 years of donation. It is concluded that the impact of heterosexual transmission of HIV infection on transfusion safety is not worsening at this time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood Banks↗
PubMed1992

HIV infection among patients in U.S. acute care hospitals. Strategies for the counseling and testing of the hospital patients. The Hospital HIV Surveillance Group.

BACKGROUND: Routine, voluntary testing of hospital patients for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been proposed in order to identify those with early HIV infection in a setting where there is ready access to counseling, appropriate clinical referral, evaluation, and therapy. We studied the pattern of HIV infection among patients in 20 U.S. hospitals, in order to evaluate possible national strategies for the routine, voluntary HIV counseling and testing of hospital patients. METHODS: Blood specimens remaining after clinical use from a systematically selected sample of patients at 20 hospitals in 15 U.S. cities were tested anonymously for antibody to HIV type 1 (HIV-1). Multivariate regression was used to determine which variables best predicted HIV seroprevalence in individual hospitals. Using these data, we estimated the number of HIV-positive patients in all U.S. hospitals and considered the efficiency of routine counseling and testing in different subgroups of patients and hospitals. RESULTS: From September 1989 through October 1991, 9286 of 195,829 specimens (4.7 percent) were positive for HIV-1 in the 20 hospitals. The seroprevalence of HIV at these institutions ranged from 0.2 percent to 14.2 percent. Among HIV-positive patients, 32 percent had symptomatic HIV infection or the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) at the time of admission or evaluation. In the 20 hospitals, HIV seroprevalence was 10.4 times (95 percent confidence interval, 8.8 to 12.0) the AIDS-diagnosis rate (the annual number of patients with new diagnoses of AIDS per 1000 discharges in 1990). In a multivariate model that included 13 hospital-specific variables, only the AIDS-diagnosis rate was associated with the hospital-specific HIV-seroprevalence rate (P less than 0.001). Using these data and the AIDS-diagnosis rates for all U.S. acute care hospitals, we estimated that 225,000 HIV-positive persons were hospitalized (95 percent confidence interval, 190,000 to 260,000) in all 5558 such hospitals in 1990, including 163,000 persons presenting with conditions other than HIV or AIDS (95 percent confidence interval, 130,000 to 196,000). In 1990, in 593 U.S. hospitals with AIDS-diagnosis rates of 1.0 or more per 1000 discharges, HIV testing of patients 15 to 54 years old (3 million patients, or 12.0 percent of all patients in U.S. acute care hospitals) would have identified an estimated 68 percent of all HIV-positive patients (110,000 patients) who were admitted with conditions other than symptomatic HIV infection or AIDS. CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that about 225,000 HIV-positive persons were hospitalized in 1990, of whom only one third were admitted for symptomatic HIV infection or AIDS. Routine, voluntary HIV testing of patients 15 to 54 years old in hospitals with 1 or more patients with newly diagnosed AIDS per 1000 discharges per year could potentially have identified as many as 110,000 patients with HIV infection that was previously unrecognized.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗
PubMed1992

HIV seroprevalence in hospital patients in rural Georgia.

To determine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroprevalence among hospital patients in three rural community-based hospitals in southern Georgia, we anonymously tested patients 15 to 54 years old for antibodies to HIV-1 from residual blood specimens collected for routine diagnostic purposes. Data collected included age, sex, race, hospital service, presenting condition, physician's knowledge of HIV infection status, and discharge diagnosis. Of 1319 patients tested, seven (0.5%, 95% confidence interval = 0.2% to 1.1%) had antibodies to HIV-1. Of those seven, five had HIV infection unsuspected by their physicians, and four had an infectious disease. HIV seroprevalence was 0.5% for both men and women, 1.0% for blacks, and 0.3% for whites. HIV-positive patients were found on all hospital services. These results suggest that in rural southern Georgia hospitals, HIV should be routinely considered in the differential diagnosis of conditions that may be related to HIV. In addition, these data demonstrate a need for medical services or referral networks for HIV-related illnesses and a need for continuing HIV counseling and testing offered by local health departments in rural southern Georgia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

No evidence for female-to-female HIV transmission among 960,000 female blood donors. The HIV Blood Donor Study Group.

The frequency of female-to-female HIV transmission was assessed among 960,000 female blood donors at 20 large U.S. blood centers during 1990. Of 144 HIV-seropositive women identified, 106 were interviewed. None of the interviewed women reported sex exclusively with women since 1978. Three seropositive women reported sex contact with women as well as with either bisexual men or men who had used i.v. drugs. In this large population, we identified no woman who was infected with HIV from sexual contact with another woman.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Platelet aggregation and fatty acid composition of platelets in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

A raised content of arachidonic acid in platelets from diabetic patients with retinopathy was found without differences in platelet aggregation: platelet aggregability was not related to platelet fatty acid composition. In diabetes, platelet aggregation was inversely correlated to non-esterified fatty acids in plasma and may suggest an inhibiting effect. Mean platelet volume was raised in the diabetic patients, but without hyperaggregability. The findings do not exclude a relationship between platelet fatty acids and platelet aggregability, but suggest that variations in levels of non-esterified fatty acids in plasma might interfere with platelet aggregation.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Human immunodeficiency virus infection in disadvantaged adolescents. Findings from the US Job Corps.

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE--To describe the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic among socially and educationally disadvantaged young persons in the United States. DESIGN: -We analyzed demographic and geographic findings from the screening of Job Corps students for antibody to HIV. SETTING--The Job Corps is a federal training program for disadvantaged, out-of-school youth. POPULATION SCREENED--Residential students aged 16 to 21 years who entered the Job Corps from October 1987 through February 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Rates of observed HIV infection in entering students, stratified by demographic and geographic features. RESULTS--Of 137,209 Job Corps students screened, 488 were HIV seropositive (3.6 per 1000), a seroprevalence rate higher than that among military applicants of the same age. Overall seroprevalence was slightly higher in male (3.7 per 1000) than in female (3.2 per 1000) Job Corps students, but among those students aged 16 and 17 years, seroprevalence was higher among females (2.3 per 1000) than among males (1.5 per 1000) (P less than .05). For students aged 16 to 21 years, seroprevalence increased with year of age: 1.8 per 1000 per year for males and 0.7 per 1000 per year for females. Among those aged 21 years, HIV prevalence was 8.9 per 1000. For black and Hispanic students from large Northeastern cities, seroprevalence increased by 4.3 per 1000 per year of age and reached 24.8 per 1000 (one of 40) in students aged 21 years. However, among students from rural areas and small towns, HIV seroprevalence was disproportionately high in the Southeast. Compared with recently described US patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, HIV-infected students who entered the Job Corps were much more likely to be female. CONCLUSIONS--These findings show that disadvantaged, out-of-school adolescents are at high risk for HIV infection. The screening results identified surprisingly high seroprevalence in the southeastern United States and demonstrated a marked shift in the HIV epidemic to young women. Controlling the HIV epidemic among teenagers must include interventions that will reach adolescents early and outside of the formal educational system.

Adolescent↗