PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Radbruch

Publications and source records attributed to L Radbruch.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

[Deficits in the treatment of chronic pain (I)].

Pain management by general practitioners often is inadequate. Guidelines for pain management are either not observed or not known at all. Opioids are not prescribed adequately. Differential diagnoses influencing the therapeutic regimen such as drug-induced headache are not sufficiently known. Monotherapies with analgesic drugs are enforced for patients with chronic lower back pain in spite of low efficacy. Improving pain management can be difficult for the general practitioner having no special knowledges or support from pain specialists. However, the general practitioner should remain the patient-coordinator for the patient with chronic pain. Networks with general practitioners and specialised units in the hospital may offer possibilities for improvement of pain management deficits.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2000

[Deficits in the treatment of chronic pain. 2. Possibilities for improvement through the Pain Therapy Ambulant Network (STAN)].

In a regional pain management network in Cologne, the pain clinic of the department of anaesthesiology and the departments of psychosomatic medicine and of informatics, statistics and epidemiology have been cooperating with the regional board of physicians and more than 80 general practitioners since 1996. The program is sponsored by the German Ministry of Health. In this network, guidelines for the management of chronic pain have been implemented for outpatient care in the last three years. Results from the first year confirm the high level of distress of patients with chronic pain. Consultation and education offered by the coordinating office and in training courses were accepted by the practitioners in variable degrees. Some physicians requested consultations frequently while including only a few patients in the study documentation, while other physicians requested consultations rarely and assessed many patients. Participating physicians were also asked to provide analgesic regimens for constructed case reports with chronic headache or cancer pain. The evaluation of these prescriptions showed poor adherence to analgesic guidelines.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1999

[WHO recommendations for treatment of tumor pain. Development of an evaluation system].

AIM OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of the observance of the World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain management is a prerequisite for further research into the effectiveness and acceptability of the guidelines. METHODS: In a nationwide survey 172 physicians in pain management and oncological units documented transdermal therapy with fentanyl. From October 1996 to May 1997, 591 patients were included. A total of 148 patients had already received transdermal fentanyl before inclusion in the survey, and no data on previous analgesic management were available for 7 patients. For 436 patients analgesic therapy before initiation of transdermal fentanyl was evaluated. The last analgesic regimen documented by the treating physician was rated by three physicians from our pain clinic independently of each other. A rating system with four items (potency of analgesic according to the analgesic ladder of the WHO guidelines, prescription of a rescue medication, combination of nonopioids with opioids, inadequate combinations of analgesics) and a global rating (the analgesic regimen is considered adequate, sufficient or inadequate) was used. RESULTS: Good agreement was reached for classification according to the analgesic ladder, prescription of rescue medication and for inadequate drug combinations. The ratings on combinations with nonopioids showed more differences. The scores for the global assessment showed a wide difference between raters, with agreement on the same score for only 36.2% (raters 1 and 3), 36.7% (raters 2 and 3) and 55.5% of the patients (raters 1 and 3). CONCLUSIONS: A global assessment score is not useful for evaluation of guideline acceptance. A more differentiated scoring system was developed for further studies that includes the analgesic ladder and other aspects of the WHO guidelines in a 10-point score.

English Abstract↗
PubMed1999

[Switching opioids to transdermal fentanyl in a clinical setting].

INTRODUCTION: The use of transdermal fentanyl is gaining in importance in the management of cancer pain. We describe the reasons for switching opioid medication to transdermal fentanyl in a pain management unit. METHODS: Case records of patients treated with transdermal fentanyl in our pain clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Conversion ratios were calculated from the opioid dosage before and after conversion. Pain intensities were assessed on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0: no pain, 10: worst pain imaginable). RESULTS: From October 1995 to December 1997 101 patients received transdermal fentanyl. Thirty-six patients had been treated with transdermal fentanyl before admission to our pain clinic, and relevant information was missing for one patient, so 64 patients were evaluated. Opioid therapy was switched to transdermal fentanyl during in-patient treatment for 53 patients and during out-patient treatment for 11 patients. Before conversion patients were treated with slow-release morphine (48%), immediate-release morphine (17%), buprenorphine (11%), tramadol (11%), levomethadone (5%), tilidine/naloxone (5%) and piritramid (3%). Reasons for opioid rotation were inadequate pain relief ( 33%), the patients' wish to reduce oral medication (20%), gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea (31%), vomiting (13%) and constipation (19%), dysphagia (27%) or others. Reduction of side effects was reported by 10 of 19 patients. In 12 of 21 patients, in whom the medication was switched because of inadequate pain relief, a reduction in pain intensity was reported. DISCUSSION: Conversion to transdermal therapy may readjust the balance between opioid analgesia and side effects. The opioid switch resulted in more pain relief or fewer side effects in half of the patients. A proposed equianalgesic conversion ratio between 70:1 and 100:1 from oral slow-release morphine to transdermal fentanyl can be confirmed by our data. Conversion rates from other opioids to transdermal fentanyl are suggested.

English Abstract↗
PubMed1999

Temporal presentation of chronic cancer pain: transitory pains on admission to a multidisciplinary pain clinic.

Transitory flares of pain are well-recognized events in both untreated and treated patients suffering from chronic cancer pain. For the purpose of this survey, we refer to transitory pain (TP) as any event subjectively characterized by transience and pain intensity over a baseline pain. In Part I, TP was reported by 243 (39%) of 613 consecutive cancer pain patients. Gender, age, tumor site, stage, and therapy were not related to the presence of TP. Neuropathic baseline pain was associated with a higher prevalence of TP (P < 0.0001). TP was somatic in 39%, visceral in 22%, and neuropathic in 36% of patients. TP intensity was severe or worse in 92% of patients. Neuropathic TP was briefer and occurred more frequently than nociceptive TP. In Part II, further features of TP were surveyed in 55 patients. Patients reported spontaneous occurrence of TP (40%), a relationship to movement (36%), to the analgesic regimen (35%), to coughing (11%), and to various other factors (18%). Only half of the movement-related TP were predictable. Rescue medication was at least partially effective in 75% of patients. Change in position, rest, diversion, and physiotherapy were commonly employed to alleviate TP. This survey outlined a framework to characterize TP that may prove useful to clarify the definition, pathophysiology, and prevalence of these pains.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

High-dose tramadol in comparison to low-dose morphine for cancer pain relief.

Cancer pain treatment following the World Health Organization guidelines is effective and feasible. However, the evidence supporting the use of opioids for mild to moderate pain on the second step of the analgesic ladder is widely discussed. The present evaluation compares the efficacy and safety of high doses of oral tramadol (> or = 300 mg/d) with low doses of oral morphine (< or = 60 mg/d). Patients were included in this nonblinded and nonrandomized study if the combination of a nonopioid analgesic and up to 250 mg/d of oral tramadol was inadequate. 810 patients received oral tramadol for a total of 23,497 days, and 848 patients received oral morphine for a total of 24,695 days. The average dose of tramadol was 428 +/- 101 mg/d (range 300-600 mg/d); the average dose of morphine was 42 +/- 13 mg/d (range 10-60 mg/d). Additional nonopioid analgesics were given on more than 95% of days. Antiemetics, laxatives, neuroleptics, and steroids were prescribed significantly more frequently in the morphine group; the use of other adjuvants was similar in both groups. The mean pain intensity on a 0-100 numerical rating scale (NRS) was 27 +/- 21 (95% CI 26-29) in the tramadol and 26 +/- 20 (95% CI 24-27) in the morphine group (NS). The analgesic efficacy was good in 74% and 78%, satisfactory in 10% and 7%, and inadequate in 16% and 15% of patients receiving tramadol and morphine, respectively (NS). Constipation, neuropsychological symptoms, and pruritus were observed significantly more frequently with low-dose morphine; other symptoms had similar frequencies in both groups. These data suggest that tramadol can be used for the treatment of cancer pain, when nonopioids alone are not effective. High doses of tramadol are effective and safe.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Validation of the German version of the Brief Pain Inventory.

The Brief Pain Inventory is a comprehensive instrument for pain assessment and has been validated in several languages. A validated German version was not available until now. From March to May 1995 all outpatients of the pain clinic of the Department of Anesthesiology completed a questionnaire with the German versions of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire. The BPI was repeated after the consultation. The physician assessed the performance status score of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). The questionnaire was completed by 151 patients. Forty-two patients were excluded from evaluation for methodological reasons, so 109 patients were evaluated. As in the original version of the BPI, factor analysis showed a common factor for pain intensity and a second factor for pain-related interference with function. The comparative fit index of 0.86 confirmed this model. Responses before and after consultation correlated closely for the sum scores of the pain intensity items (Perarson correlation r = 0.976) as well as for the interference with function items (r = 0.974). Pain intensity in the BPI correlated with bodily pain in the SF-36 (r = 0.585). Sum scores of the pain interference items were higher in patients with deteriorated ECOG performance status, whereas sum scores of the intensity items were not changed. Validity and reliability of the German BPI were comparable to the original version. The BPI may be advantageous for palliative care patients, as it places only a small burden on the patient and offers easy criteria for evaluation. However, further research is needed to differentiate the impact of pain-related and disease-related interference with function on the BPI, and to find an algorithm for the evaluation of the BPI when values are missing.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Intravenous titration with morphine for severe cancer pain: report of 28 cases.

BACKGROUND: In a multicenter study, 28 patients with cancer pain and insufficient pain relief with analgesic treatment according to step II of the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) were switched to oral slow-release morphine. METHODS: Patients received intravenous morphine through a patient-controlled pump (PCA) for the first 24 hours (bolus = 1 mg, lockout interval = 5 minutes, maximum dose = 12 mg/hour). From day 2 patients were treated with oral slow-release morphine. Daily doses were calculated from the requirements of the day before. Breakthrough pain was treated with PCA until stable doses were reached (<2 boluses/day) and then with oral immediate-release morphine solution. Pain intensity was reported in a diary four times a day, in addition to mood, activity, and quality of sleep once daily. RESULTS: Mean duration until adequate pain relief reported (<30 on a 101-step numerical scale; NRS) was 5 hours (range = 80-620 minutes). Mean pain intensity was reduced from 67 NRS to 22 NRS. Mean doses of oral morphine were 133 mg/day initially and then 154 mg/day on day 14. Serious adverse events such as respiratory depression were not observed. Two patients terminated the study due to progressive symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction. Seventy-five percent of the patients evaluated the effectiveness of the analgesic regime as good. CONCLUSIONS: Dose finding with intravenous PCA may be appropriate for a small minority of patients with severe pain. Higher treatment costs and the risk of complications are drawbacks of this method compared with conventional oral titration.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

[Weak opioids. Meta-analysis for the therapy of chronic pain].

Weak opioids have a maximal dose (ceiling effect), and their distribution and prescription is not controlled by German narcotic laws. In a literature search (Medline 1963-1995) and our own literature database on pain treatment, 58 publications were identified. These reported about 130 comparisons of weak opioids with different analgesics. The statistical parameters of a meta-analysis were not calculated, due to great differences of the study design and the examined drugs. The results of this literature analysis demonstrate the analgesic efficacy of weak opioids in chronic pain. Non-opioid analgesics and strong opioids, however, have greater potency. These results are based mainly on single-dose studies; controlled long-term studies are required. Especially the risk of serious complications involving the gastrointestinal tract, kidney and blood cells during long-term treatment with non-opioid analgesics or weak opioids needs to be evaluated. In addition, the combination of non-opioid analgesics and weak opioids versus the combination of nonopioid analgesics and placebo or low-dose strong opioids has to be investigated. The results of this literature analysis support the use of weak opioids in the symptomatic treatment of chronic pain, though the evidence of the available literature is limited. It can be recommended to prescribe weak opioids according to the WHO ladder in combination with non-opioid analgesics. If this combination provides no adequate analgesic efficacy, however, the use of strong opioids must not be delayed.

English Abstract↗
PubMed1998

[Out-patient hospice services--their importance for palliative care in Germany].

Hospice services can be divided into three groups. Few institutions deliver the full scope of palliative home care, most of the others can provide considerably less. The third group of services are those that do not support patients but aim to establish a home care service or a hospice. In February, 1997 396 home care services were working in Germany. 48 of these services provided palliative home care, 69 services were hospice initiatives. The scope of services rendered is very broad and reaches from psychosocial support to complex medical tasks. In the last year, 13,700 patients have been supported at home by hospice services in Germany. Palliative care services usually have professional staff, but they would not be able to work without honorary help. Beside of support for patients and relatives tasks of the home care service are the coordination and exchange between in-patient units, general physicians and social care ward. By cooperation with all institutions for out-patient and home care as well as with general physicians, they contribute to avoid in-patient treatment for their patients. Another important function is to spread the hospice idea and work as multipliers for knowledges and attitudes in palliative care. The number of home care services available in Germany is not sufficient. Only 48 institutions can be ranked as palliative care services. The distribution of the hospice services in Germany is very irregular, and providers of home care services are even more scarce in the eastern part of Germany.

Germany↗
PubMed1997

[Myoclonus resulting from high-dose epidural and intravenous morphine infusion].

BACKGROUND: Myoclonus is a possible side effect of opioid therapy, and have been described following systemic as well as spinal application. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient with metastatic carcinoma of the rectum who developed myoclonus following administration of high-dose epidural combined with iv morphine. This complication occurred with maximum daily doses of 300 mg epidurally and 80 mg intravenously and disappeared completely after dose reduction. Treatment trials are presented, the pathophysiology of the myoclonus is discussed. CONCLUSION: For treatment of opioid-induced myoclonus a dose reduction or a change of the opioid should be considered as well as symptomatic treatment with benzodiazepines or baclofen.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Transdermal fentanyl in the long-term treatment of cancer pain: a prospective study of 50 patients with advanced cancer of the gastrointestinal tract or the head and neck region.

This open prospective study evaluated the combination of initial dose titration with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and long-term treatment with transdermal fentanyl in 50 cancer patients requiring opioids for severe pain. The delivery rate of the first transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) was calculated from the self-administered intravenous fentanyl dose during the first 24 h. TTS were changed every 48-72 h, and a different patch size was chosen if necessary. Pain intensity (101-step numeric analog scale) and side-effects were assessed daily. The patients were treated for 66 +/- 101 days (range 3-535 days). The average delivery rate was 5.9 +/- 4.1 mg/d. Mean pain intensity decreased from initially 45 +/- 21 to 19 +/- 15 in the titration phase and 15 +/- 11 during long-term treatment. Three patients showed moderate respiratory depression. Other severe side-effects were not observed. Patient compliance and acceptance were excellent. The results suggest that intravenous PCA is useful for initial dose finding, and transdermal fentanyl is effective and safe during long-term treatment of cancer pain.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1997

A pilot study of continuous ambulatory electrocardiography in patients donating blood for autologous use in elective coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a single autologous blood donation on the presence or absence of myocardial ischemic episodes in patients with coronary artery disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting underwent two 24-hour periods of ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring, one before and one after their first autologous blood donation. The presence or absence and the number, duration, and integral area of episodes of ST segment depression for each 24-hour monitoring period were determined. RESULTS: Forty-two patients had legible electrocardiogram recordings for both monitoring periods. Of these, 36 patients (86%) had at least one episode of ST segment depression during any monitoring period. The number of patients who had at least one episode of ST segment depression before donation was not significantly different from the number of those who had at least one episode after donation (31 and 33 patients, respectively; p = 0.73). CONCLUSION: Donating a unit of blood had no demonstrable effect on the presence or absence of myocardial ischemic episodes in this sample of 42 autologous blood donors with coronary artery disease. The results of this study should be validated in further trials.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

[Trends in autologous blood transfusion in the old states of the Federal Republic of Germany, 1989-1993. 1. A panel study of 143 hopitals].

Increased perception of the risks of homologous blood transfusion has focused substantial interest on autologous blood transfusion (ABT). To evaluate the role of ABT in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG), we conducted postal surveys of German hospitals in 1989 and 1993. In the present study, the responses of 143 hospitals in the "old" federal states (former West Germany) that replied to both of our surveys were analysed. The objective was to examine trends in ABT practice in the FRG from 1989 to 1993. The study was restricted to the "old" federal states because data for the "new" federal states (former German Democratic Republic) were not available for that period. METHODS. Data presented in this study were obtained by postal surveys of German hospitals in 1989 and 1993. Because of German reunification (3 October 1990), only hospitals in the "old" federal states were surveyed in 1989, while hospitals in both the "old" and "new" states were included in 1993. Four hundred randomly selected hospitals in the "old" federal states were included in both surveys, 143 of which responded to both. The completed questionnaires of these 143 hospitals were analysed. In addition, to estimate the magnitude of positive selection bias, the data provided by these 143 hospitals were compared with data provided by another set of 162 hospitals in the "old" federal states that replied to the 1993 but not to the 1989 survey. RESULTS. There were no significant changes from 1989 to 1993 in the 143 hospitals with respect to hospital size by number of beds and spectrum of surgical specialties. The proportion of hospitals that performed preoperative autologous blood donation grew by 20% (from 74% to 89%) and the proportion that used this technique regularly ("frequently" and "mostly") rose by 80% (from 25% to 45%). The percentage of hospitals that performed preoperative plasmapheresis had more than doubled (from 8% to 19%). The proportion that used acute isovolaemic haemodilution grew by 32% (from 62% to 82%), while those doing so regularly ("frequently" and "mostly") increased by only 17% (from 23% to 27%). The fraction of hospitals equipped with cell-washing devices grew by 29% (from 35% to 45%). General transfusion practice, as measured by acceptance of postoperative haemoglobin levels of less than 10.0 g/dl, had changed but little. CONCLUSIONS. Although the 143 hospitals are not representative on a national level, the findings of our study allow some conclusions on general trends in the "old" states of the FRG. The potential for ABT has substantially grown in the "old" states from 1989 to 1993, although more consistent advantage of this potential could be taken.

Blood Transfusion, Autologous↗
PubMed1996

High-dose oral morphine in cancer pain management: a report of twelve cases.

We present 12 case reports from patients treated with more than 600 mg of morphine per day. We found no "opioid-nonresponsive pain" under treatment with a combination of morphine and nonopioids, supplemented with coanalgesics where appropriate. Side effects of morphine therapy were controlled with adjuvant drugs. Serious adverse effects were not observed. Episodes of break-through pain, dysphagia, and dyspnea caused by far advanced cancer disease were seen frequently.

Aged↗