PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Restivo

Publications and source records attributed to L Restivo.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning about the context in genetically-defined mice.

Defective utilisation of background stimuli may result in a large range of cognitive impairments. We describe here three experimental paradigms taxing the processing of contextual information, (i) radial maze learning under distinct cueing conditions and successive context shifts; (ii) reactivity to spatial and object change; (iii) contextual versus cue fear conditioning with pre-test exposure to the experimental context. These paradigms have then been used to characterise the behaviour of null mutant and transgenic mice. In a first series of experiments, we assessed the effect of the null mutation of the gene encoding for Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA). Initial investigations pointed to a reduction of the late phase of long-term potentiation in tPA-knock out relative to wild type mice without any consistent performance impairment in several hippocampal-dependent tasks. When tested following our protocols, we found tPA knock out impaired in habituation of object exploration, reactivity to spatial change and contextual fear conditioning. The second example concerns mice overexpressing the mutant human Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene, that provide a murine model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We found these mice exhibiting a paradoxical selective enhancement of reactivity to spatial change in comparison with mice overexpressing either the endogeneous murine Cu,Zn SOD1 or the wild type human Cu,Zn SOD1 genes. Our conclusion emphasises the view that experimental protocols involving contextual manipulations may be suitable for differentiating behavioural phenotypes.

Animals↗

Contextual-dependent effects of nucleus accumbens lesions on spatial learning in mice.

The effect of nucleus accumbens lesions on radial maze performance of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice was assessed under distinct extra-maze cuing conditions. Among sham-lesioned mice, C57BL/6 performed better under rich than poor cuing conditions whereas DBA performed in the same fashion under both conditions. In C57BL/6, a disruptive effect of lesions was found only in mice tested under rich cuing. Conversely, in DBA/2, the lesions improved performance under poor cuing and disrupted performance under rich cuing. In that strain, a possible lesion-induced enhancement of attention to background stimuli improving performance under poor cuing but producing interference under rich cuing is suggested. In general, the lesions effect seemed to depend on the strain predisposition to implement configural or cue-based responding.

Animals↗

Fear conditioning in C57/BL/6 and DBA/2 mice: variability in nucleus accumbens function according to the strain predisposition to show contextual- or cue-based responding.

The contribution of the nucleus accumbens shell, the dorsal hippocampus, and the basolateral amygdala to contextual and explicit cue fear conditioning was assessed in C57BL/6 (C57) and DBA/2 (DBA) mice showing differences in processing contextual information associated with consistent but non-pathological variations in hippocampal functionality. Mice from both strains with bilateral ibotenic acid or sham lesions located in each area were introduced in a conditioning chamber and exposed twice to the pairing of a tone (2 x 8 s, 2000 Hz, 80 dB) with a shock (2 s, 0.7 mA). On the following day, mice were first exposed to the training context then to the tone in a different context. Freezing behaviour was scored in all situations. C57 showed more freezing to the context than to the tone whereas DBA showed more freezing to the tone than to the context. In C57, both nucleus accumbens and hippocampal lesions impaired acquisition of contextual fear conditioning but paradoxically improved acquisition of cue fear conditioning, whereas amygdala lesions disrupted performance in every task. In DBA, nucleus accumbens lesions, like amygdala lesions, impaired acquisition of both contextual and cue fear conditioning, whereas hippocampal lesions did not produce any effect. The parallelism between the effect of nucleus accumbens and hippocampus lesions in C57, and between the effect of nucleus accumbens and amygdala lesions in DBA points to a variability in nucleus accumbens function according to the strain specialization to develop context- or cue-based responding.

Acoustic Stimulation↗