The murine type 1 diabetes loci, Idd1, Idd3, Idd5, Idd9, and Idd17/10/18, do not control thymic CD4-CD8-/TCRalphabeta+ deficiency in the nonobese diabetic mouse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Biomedical subjects
L S Wicker
Publications and source records attributed to L S Wicker.
Genetic protection from the inflammatory disease type 1 diabetes in humans and animal models.
Populations of humans and mice contain alleles at many loci that protect from immune-mediated diseases. Identification of these alleles, some which are likely to function in immune recognition, tolerance, and regulation, will facilitate the development of diagnostics as well as therapeutics that alter disease progression.
Alleles↗
Statistical modeling of interlocus interactions in a complex disease: rejection of the multiplicative model of epistasis in type 1 diabetes.
In general, common diseases do not follow a Mendelian inheritance pattern. To identify disease mechanisms and etiology, their genetic dissection may be assisted by evaluation of linkage in mouse models of human disease. Statistical modeling of multiple-locus linkage data from the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse model of type 1 diabetes has previously provided evidence for epistasis between alleles of several Idd (insulin-dependent diabetes) loci. The construction of NOD congenic strains containing selected segments of the diabetes-resistant strain genome allows analysis of the joint effects of alleles of different loci in isolation, without the complication of other segregating Idd loci. In this article, we analyze data from congenic strains carrying two chromosome intervals (a double congenic strain) for two pairs of loci: Idd3 and Idd10 and Idd3 and Idd5. The joint action of both pairs is consistent with models of additivity on either the log odds of the penetrance, or the liability scale, rather than with the previously proposed multiplicative model of epistasis. For Idd3 and Idd5 we would also not reject a model of additivity on the penetrance scale, which might indicate a disease model mediated by more than one pathway leading to beta-cell destruction and development of diabetes. However, there has been confusion between different definitions of interaction or epistasis as used in the biological, statistical, epidemiological, and quantitative and human genetics fields. The degree to which statistical analyses can elucidate underlying biologic mechanisms may be limited and may require prior knowledge of the underlying etiology.
Animals↗
Mapping by genetic interaction: high-resolution congenic mapping of the type 1 diabetes loci Idd10 and Idd18 in the NOD mouse.
As many of the linked chromosome regions that predispose to type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse have been dissected, it has become apparent that the initially observed effect is in fact attributable to several loci. One such cluster of loci on distal chromosome 3, originally described as Idd10, is now known to comprise three separate loci, Idd10, Idd17, and Idd18. Although these loci have a significant combined effect on diabetes development, their individual effects are barely detectable when diabetes is used as a read-out, which makes fine-mapping them by use of a conventional congenic approach impractical. In this study, we demonstrate that it is possible to map loci, with modest effects, to regions small enough for systematic gene identification by capitalizing on the fact that the combined loci provide more profound, measurable protection. We have mapped the Idd10 and Idd18 loci to 1.3- and 2.0-cM intervals, respectively, by holding the Idd3 allele constant. In addition, we have excluded Csf1 and Nras as candidates for both loci.
Animals↗
Differential glycosylation of interleukin 2, the molecular basis for the NOD Idd3 type 1 diabetes gene?
The insulin-dependent diabetes (Idd) gene, Idd3, has been localised to a 0.35 cM region of chromosome 3 containing the structural gene for the cytokine interleukin 2 (IL-2). While variation of the N-terminal amino acid sequence of IL-2 has been shown to correlate with Idd3 allelic variation, differences in induction of proliferation by IL-2 allotypes have not been detected. In the current study, we examined the electrophoretic migration of IL-2 allotypes and have found two distinct patterns, consistent with differences in glycosylation, that correlate with diabetes-resistance and susceptibility. These findings strongly suggest that IL-2 variants may be functionally distinct.
Alleles↗
The NOD Idd9 genetic interval influences the pathogenicity of insulitis and contains molecular variants of Cd30, Tnfr2, and Cd137.
Previous analyses of NOD mice have shown that some genes control the development of both insulitis and diabetes, while other loci influence diabetes without reducing insulitis. Evidence for the existence of a gene only influencing diabetes, Idd9 on mouse chromosome 4, is provided here by the development of a novel congenic mouse strain, NOD.B10 Idd9. NOD.B10 Idd9 mice display profound resistance to diabetes even though nearly all develop insulitis. Subcongenic analysis has demonstrated that alleles of at least three B10 genes, Idd9.1, Idd9.2, and Idd9.3 are required to produce Idd9-mediated diabetes resistance. Candidate genes with amino acid differences between the NOD and B10 strains have been localized to the 5.6 cM Idd9.2 interval (Tnfr2, Cd30) and to the 2.0 cM Idd9.3 interval (Cd137).
Alleles↗
Congenic mapping of the type 1 diabetes locus, Idd3, to a 780-kb region of mouse chromosome 3: identification of a candidate segment of ancestral DNA by haplotype mapping.
Type 1 diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse arises as a consequence of T cell-mediated destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells of the pancreas. Although little is known of the events that initiate and subsequently drive beta-cell destruction it is clear that the entire process is under complex genetic control. At present 19 loci have been mapped that influence the development of diabetes either at the level of initiation of insulitis or at the level of progression from insulitis to overt diabetes, or both. Previously, we have mapped one of these loci, Idd3, to a 0.35-cM interval on proximal mouse chromosome 3. In the present study we have narrowed the map position of this locus to an interval of 0.15 cM by a combination of novel congenic strains and an ancestral haplotype analysis approach. We have constructed a physical contig in bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones across the minimal interval. Restriction mapping of the BAC contig placed the maximum size of the Idd3 interval at 780 kb between the markers D3Nds36 and D3Nds76. To refine further the Idd3 interval we developed a series of novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and carried out haplotype analysis on DNA from mouse strains known to carry either Idd3 susceptibility or protective alleles. This haplotype analysis identified a 145-kb segment of ancestral DNA between the microsatellite marker D3Nds6 and the SNP 81.3. One haplotype of this ancestral segment of DNA is found in mouse strains carrying an Idd3 susceptibility allele and another is found in mouse strains carrying an Idd3 protective allelle. Within the 780-kb congenically defined interval this 145-kb segment represents the most likely location for Idd3. The Il2 gene, which encodes the cytokine interleukin 2 (IL2), maps to this interval and is a strong candidate for Idd3. To investigate whether sequence variation exists in the promoter region of the Il2 gene, which might alter its expression, we sequenced the promoter region of the Il2 gene from mouse strains carrying either an Idd3 susceptibility or resistance allele. Two sequence variants were identified, neither of which fell in known regulatory elements within the Il2 promoter. In agreement with this observation steady-state Il2 mRNA levels showed no variation between susceptible and resistant mouse strains. These data suggest that the profound protection from diabetes seen in congenic mice carrying an Idd3 protective allele is unlikely to be due to differences in the level of expression of the Il2 gene. Instead, all of the current data support our hypothesis that Idd3 corresponds to amino acid variation at the amino terminus of Il2.
Alleles↗
NOD Idd5 locus controls insulitis and diabetes and overlaps the orthologous CTLA4/IDDM12 and NRAMP1 loci in humans.
A genome scan for B10-derived loci that reduce the frequency of diabetes and insulitis in NOD mice demonstrated a large region (34 cM) of linkage on the proximal end of chromosome 1. This locus was designated Idd5 and encompassed candidate genes including Il1r1, Il1r2, Stat1, Stat4, Nramp1, and Bcl2. In the current study, we have confirmed the existence of Idd5 by developing a series of congenic mouse strains that are resistant to diabetes and determined that Idd5 is actually two genes located within a 9.4-cM interval. Idd5.1 is in the proximal 1.5-cM portion of the interval and contains the candidates Casp8, Cflar (FLIP), Cd28, and Cd152 (CTLA4). Idd5.1 overlaps the orthologous CTLA4/IDDM12 locus in humans. Idd5.2 is in the distal 5.1-cM portion of the 9.4-cM interval and contains the candidates Nramp1, which has a functional polymorphism between NOD and B10, and Cmkar2 (CXCR2, interleukin [IL]-8 receptor alpha). Candidate genes eliminated by this analysis include Il1r1, Ilr2, Zap70, Orch5, Stat1, Stat4, Bcl2, Cmkar4 (CXCR4), and Il10. On its own, the Idd5 locus provides a significant amount of protection from diabetes (50% reduction from parental frequency) and when combined with another resistance locus (Idd3 on chromosome 3), provides nearly complete protection from diabetes and insulitis.
Abatacept↗
Analysis of the mouse CD30 gene: a candidate for the NOD mouse type 1 diabetes locus Idd9.2.
Members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily play an important role in the initiation, expansion, and termination of an immune response. It has recently been demonstrated that one member of this family, CD30, plays a central role in maintaining peripheral tolerance by controlling the expansion of autoreactive CD8+ T-cells. In the present study, Cd30 was mapped to a 5.6-cM interval on chromosome 4 containing the type 1 diabetes susceptibility locus Idd9.2. We determined the intron/exon structure of Cd30 and sequenced the exons, as well as 1.8 kb of the 5' putative promoter region, from 6 different mouse strains. Remarkably, 63 sequence variants, both coding and noncoding, were found. A total of 27 sequence variants, 4 of which were nonsynonymous, were found between the diabetes susceptible NOD strain and the resistant B10 strain. Of these sequence variants, 19 are within the promoter region. However, no difference between NOD and the congenic strain NOD.B10 Idd9R1, which has the B10 allele of Cd30, was observed in CD30 expression at either the mRNA or protein level. Given its role in protecting against autoimmunity, one or more of the coding variants within CD30 is a good candidate for the Idd9.2 etiological variant.
Animals↗
Role of APC in the selection of immunodominant T cell epitopes.
Following antigenic challenge, MHC-restricted T cell responses are directed against a few dominant antigenic epitopes. Here, evidence is provided demonstrating the importance of APC in modulating the hierarchy of MHC class II-restricted T cell responses. Biochemical analysis of class II:peptide complexes in B cells revealed the presentation of a hierarchy of peptides derived from the Ig self Ag. Functional studies of kappa peptide:class II complexes from these cells indicated that nearly 20-fold more of an immunodominant epitope derived from kappa L chains was bound to class II DR4 compared with a subdominant epitope from this same Ag. In vivo, T cell responses were preferentially directed against the dominant kappa epitope as shown using Ig-primed DR4 transgenic mice. The bias in kappa epitope presentation was not linked to differences in class II:kappa peptide-binding affinity or epitope editing by HLA-DM. Rather, changes in native Ag structure were found to disrupt presentation of the immunodominant but not the subdominant kappa epitope; Ag refolding restored kappa epitope presentation. Thus, Ag tertiary conformation along with processing reactions within APC contribute to the selective presentation of a hierarchy of epitopes by MHC class II molecules.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Tetrapeptide derived inhibitors of complexation of a class II MHC: the peptide backbone is not inviolate.
Major histocompatabilty (MHC) proteins rely heavily on peptide backbone recognition for ligation. Nonetheless, modifications to the polyamide backbone of a tetrapeptide ligand can be made without abrogating binding.
Binding Sites↗
Tetrapeptide derived inhibitors of complexation of a class II MHC: fully unnatural ligands.
Tetrapeptide derived major histocompatability (MHC) II ligands have been developed that contain no unadulterated peptide bonds. These are the 'least peptidic' ligands for any MHC protein yet reported.
Drug Design↗
QTL influencing autoimmune diabetes and encephalomyelitis map to a 0.15-cM region containing Il2.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Localising quantitative trait loci in the NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Localization of two insulin-dependent diabetes (Idd) genes to the Idd10 region on mouse chromosome 3.
Multiple genes control the development of autoimmune diabetes both in humans and in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) strain of mouse. Previously, three insulin-dependent diabetes (Idd) genes, Idd3, Idd10, and Idd17, were localized to mouse Chromosome (Chr) 3. The B10- or B6-derived resistance alleles at Idd10 and Idd3 together provide the NOD mouse with nearly complete protection from diabetes. In the present study, the 10.2-cM region encoding Idd10 was defined further with newly developed congenic strains. A locus, located in the centromeric 2.1 cM of the 10.2 cM region, contributed to the Idd10 trait. However, this locus did not account for the full effect of Idd10, suggesting the presence of a second gene in the distal portion of the 10.2-cM region. This second gene is designated as Idd18 and is localized to a 5.1-cM region. The resolution of the originally defined Idd3 locus into at least four separate loci, Idd3, Idd10, Idd17, and Idd18, illustrates the complex polygenic nature of diabetes.
Animals↗
Major histocompatibility complex-linked control of autoimmunity.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Congenic mapping of the insulin-dependent diabetes (Idd) gene, Idd10, localizes two genes mediating the Idd10 effect and eliminates the candidate Fcgr1.
The development of autoimmune diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse is under the control of multiple insulin-dependent diabetes (Idd) genes. The Idd3 gene, originally defined as a broad peak of linkage on mouse chromosome 3, was subsequently identified as two genes, Idd3 and Idd10, separated by at least 20 cM. The resistance alleles of Idd3 and Idd10 individually confer only partial protection from diabetes but, in combination, result in profound resistance to disease due to an epistatic genetic interaction. In this study, we used newly developed congenic strains to further localize Idd10. Surprisingly, we found that Idd10 itself comprises at least two linked loci: Idd10 and the newly designated Idd17. Idd17 was localized to a 1.1-cM region between D3Mit26 and D3Mit40, proximal to Fcgr1, a candidate gene encoding the high affinity Fc receptor for IgG. Idd10 was localized to a 10-cM region between D3Mit213 and D3Mit106, distal to Fcgr1. Thus, Fcgr1 was excluded as a candidate for either Idd10 or Idd17, despite the fact that the NOD strain expresses a mutant form of the receptor. Interestingly, although Idd10 and Idd17 participate in a genetic interaction with each other, Idd10 but not Idd17 participates in the genetic interaction with Idd3. Our study on chromosome 3 begins to reveal the extent of the polygenic nature of autoimmune diabetes, and demonstrates that the use of congenic strains is an effective mapping strategy, even in the dissection of multiple, linked genes with subtle effects.
Alleles↗
Mapping of the IDDM locus Idd3 to a 0.35-cM interval containing the interleukin-2 gene.
Currently, 16 loci that contribute to the development of IDDM in the NOD mouse have been mapped by linkage analysis. To fine map these loci, we used congenic mapping. Using this approach, we localized the Idd3 locus to a 0.35-cM interval on chromosome 3 containing the Il2 gene. Segregation analysis of the known variations within this interval indicated that only one variant, a serine-to-proline substitution at position 6 of the mature interleukin-2 (IL-2) protein, consistently segregates with IDDM in crosses between NOD and a series of nondiabetic mouse strains. These data, taken together with the immunomodulatory role of IL-2, provide circumstantial evidence in support of the hypothesis that Idd3 is an allelic variation of the Il2 gene, or a variant in strong linkage disequilibrium.
Amino Acid Sequence↗