PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Samartino

Publications and source records attributed to L Samartino.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Towards single screening tests for brucellosis.

This paper describes an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and a fluorescence polarisation assay (FPA), each capable of detecting antibody in several species of hosts to smooth and rough members of the genus Brucella. The I-ELISA uses a mixture of smooth lipopolysaccharide (SLPS) and rough lipopolysaccharide (RLPS) as the antigen, and a recombinant protein A/G conjugated with horseradish peroxidase as the detection reagent. When using individually determined cutoff values, the SLPS/RLPS combined-antigen I-ELISA detected antibody in slightly more animals exposed to SLPS or to RLPS than did I-ELISA procedures using each individual antigen separately. Similarly, the assay using combined antigens detected antibody in slightly fewer animals not exposed to Brucella sp. When a universal cutoff of 10% positivity was used (relative to strongly positive control sera of each species), the overall performance index (percentage sensitivity plus percentage specificity) value decreased by 1.0 (from 199.4 to 198.4). In the FPA, it was not possible to use a universal cutoff without significant loss of performance. The overall sensitivity value for the FPA using the combined FPA antigen was 1.0% lower than using the O-polysaccharide (OPS) from SLPS and 9.1% higher than using the core antigen (CORE) from RLPS. When the combined antigen was used, the FPA specificity was slightly higher (1.2%) than from only the OPS, and considerably higher (12.6%) than the CORE. Overall, both the I-ELISA and the FPA with combined antigens were suitable as screening tests for all species of Brucella in the animal species tested.

Animal Diseases↗
PubMed2004

Enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of brucellosis: chimeric Protein A-Protein G as a common enzyme labeled detection reagent for sera for different animal species.

A recombinant protein combining the immunoglobulin binding sites of Proteins A and G, conjugated with horseradish peroxidase was used as a universal detection reagent for the assessment of antibodies against Brucella spp. The reagent was applied in an indirect enzyme immunoassay for detection of antibodies to smooth lipopolysaccharide antigen in sera from Brucella spp. exposed and non-exposed cattle, sheep, goats and pigs and to antibodies to rough lipopolysaccharide in sheep, dogs and cattle. The results were similar to those obtained when murine monoclonal antibody-enzyme conjugates were used. An added advantage was that a universal cut-off for all tests using the proteins A and G detection reagent could be established, simplifying diagnostic interpretation of the data.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Rough lipopolysaccharide of Brucella abortus RB51 as a common antigen for serological detection of B. ovis, B. canis, and B. abortus RB51 exposure using indirect enzyme immunoassay and fluorescence polarization assay.

Rough lipopolysaccharide (RLPS) antigens were prepared from cultures of Brucella abortus RB51, B. ovis, and B. canis. The preparations were standardized by weight and tested with sera from cattle immunized with B. abortus RB51, sheep infected with B. ovis, and dogs infected with B. canis. Populations of unexposed animals of each species were also tested. The tests used were the indirect enzyme immunoassay (IELISA) using RLPS and the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) using RLPS core fractions, labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate. The IELISA using B. abortus RB51 RLPS antigen resulted in sensitivity and specificity values of 94.8% and 97.3%, respectively, when testing bovine sera, 98.5% and 97.8% when testing ovine sera, and 95.8% and 100% when testing dog sera. The IELISA using B. ovis RLPS antigen gave sensitivity and specificity values of 80.5% and 91.7%, respectively with bovine sera, 98.9% and 93.8% with sheep sera, and 70.8% and 79.8% with dog sera. The IELISA using B. canis RLPS antigen resulted in sensitivity and specificity values of 97.0% and 97.4%, respectively, with bovine sera, 96.2% and 96.3% with sheep sera, and 95.8% and 98.8% with dog sera. Labeling RLPS core from B. ovis and B. canis with fluorescein was not successful. B. abortus RB51 core labeled with fluorescein resulted in sensitivity and specificity values of 93.5% and 99.8%, respectively, with bovine sera and 78.1% and 99.0% with sheep sera. It was not possible to test the dog sera in the FPA.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of serological tests for the detection of ovine and caprine antibody to Brucella melitensis.

The indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IELISA), the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CELISA) and the fluorescence polarisation assay (FPA) were evaluated with sera from sheep experimentally infected with Brucella melitensis and negative Canadian sheep. The sensitivity and specificity of the assays were as follows: IELISA: 91.7% and 97.6%, CELISA: 75.0% and 99.8% and FPA: 91.7% and 89.5%. Sera from the same experimental population were divided according to serological reaction in the rose bengal agglutination test (RBT) and the complement fixation test (CFT). Reactivity relative to the RBT positive and CFT positive sera were as follows: IELISA: 99.7%, CELISA: 93.2% and FPA: 99.1%. Since sera from goats with proven B. melitensis infection were not available, 699 sera from goats judged positive in the buffered antigen plate agglutination test (BPAT) and CFT and 982 BPAT/CFT negative Canadian goats were used. The sensitivity and specificity of the assays relative to the BPAT and CFT positive sera were: IELISA: 99.4% and 98.0%, CELISA: 95.4% and 97.1% and FPA: 92.7% and 99.8%.

Agglutination Tests↗
PubMed2001

Fluorescence polarization assay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: adaptation to field use.

A fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) was used to test whole blood samples prepared by mixing blood cells from cattle without exposure to Brucella abortus (B. abortus) with sera from animals with confirmed (bacteriologically) infection. A cut-off value between negative and positive values was initially established to be 87.2mP. This value was changed to 95mP to increase assay specificity without loss of sensitivity when testing blood samples from negative animals. The FPA technology was applied to whole blood samples in the field and to stored whole blood samples using two diluent buffers. Relative sensitivity and specificity values for the FPA performed in the field, based on buffered antigen plate agglutination test and competitive enzyme immunoassay results were 95.3 and 97.3%, respectively. However, to obtain maximum sensitivity and specificity, a cut-off value of 105mP was determined for fresh whole blood samples. The relative sensitivity and specificity values of the FPA when testing stored whole blood samples were 100% each using a 95mP cut-off.The usefulness of the FPA for testing whole blood samples in the field was demonstrated.

Agglutination Tests↗
PubMed2001

Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay for detection of milk antibody to Brucella abortus.

A fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) for detection of antibody to Brucella abortus in individual milk samples was developed and validated. Samples from 190 cattle from which B. abortus was isolated; milk samples from cattle in herds infected with B. abortus (n = 1,086) and positive in the milk ring test (MRT), as well as milk samples from Canadian cattle (with no evidence of brucellosis, n = 2,974) were tested by the indirect enzyme immunoassay (IELISA) and the FPA. The sensitivity (based on samples from culture positive cattle) and specificity (based on Canadian milk samples) of the IELISA and the FPA were 100%. The relative sensitivity value obtained with milk from cattle of infected herds and the specificity values of the IELISA were 98.5 and 99.9%, respectively. The relative sensitivity and specificity of the FPA with the same samples were 82.2 and 99.4% using a cutoff value of 90 millipolarization units (mP). The low relative sensitivity value of the FPA was shown, by competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA), to be due to vaccinal antibody (assumed as vaccinal antibody against B. abortus Sl19 is excluded by the FPA and CELISA but not by the MRT and the IELISA), present in some of the milk samples. The FPA is a homogeneous assay which, unlike the MRT and the IELISA, may be used for testing in the field.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Effect of vaccination with Brucella abortus strain RB51 on heifers and pregnant cattle.

Thirteen cows, which had been vaccinated as calves with strain 19, were revaccinated twice or three times as adults with I x 109 cfu of B. abortus strain RB51. Their serological responses following adult vaccination remained negative to conventional brucellosis surveillance tests. Vaccination with strain RB51 during the eighth month of pregnancy did not induce abortion, although strain RB51 was recovered from milk for up to 69 days after vaccination. In a parallel study, thirteen 8- to 10-month-old heifers were vaccinated as calves with 109 cfu of strain RB51. The heifers remained seronegative to conventional brucellosis surveillance tests but antibody responses to RB51 could be demonstrated using an indirect ELISA. This study showed that multiple vaccination with strain RB51 did not induce seroconversion to brucellosis surveillance tests. In addition, this study suggests that 109 cfu of strain RB51 is safe for use in pregnant cattle.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay as a serological test for the presumptive diagnosis of porcine brucellosis.

Sera from Canadian pigs (brucellosis free, n = 14037) and sera from pigs infected with Brucella suis (n = 401) were tested by the buffered antigen plate agglutination test, the complement fixation test, an indirect and a competitive enzyme immunoassay and a fluorescence polarization assay. The results were analysed and assay sensitivity and specificity estimates were calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were as follows: the buffered antigen plate agglutination test, 77.1 and 96.9%; the complement fixation test (considering anticomplementary sera as negative), 93.3 and 95.5%; the complement fixation test (considering anticomplementary sera as positive), 58.1 and 99.9%; the indirect enzyme immunoassay, 94.0 and 97.9%; the competitive enzyme immunoassay, 90.8 and 96.6%; and the fluorescence polarization assay, 93.5 and 97.2%; respectively. It was concluded that the fluorescence polarization assay was a valuable asset to the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis because of its accuracy, ease of performance and relative cost.

Agglutination Tests↗
PubMed1999

Validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the indirect enzyme immunoassay (IELISA) and the competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA) for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in comparison to conventional serological tests routinely used in Argentina. Serum samples (n = 3500), from Brucella-free herds, from vaccinated cattle and from naturally infected cattle, were tested by the following tests: buffered antigen agglutination test (BPAT), rose bengal test (RBT), 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME), complement fixation test (CFT), IELISA and CELISA. Sensitivity and specificity of the BPAT, RBT, IELISA and CELISA were determined relative to the 2-ME and the CFT. The CELISA was considered suitable for eliminating most serological reactions of vaccinated animals and was more specific than the other tests. The results indicate the potential use of the CELISA as a complementary assay in the brucellosis control and eradication program in Argentina and other countries, where Brucella abortusstrain 19 vaccination is mandatory.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Fluorescence polarization assay: application to the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Argentina.

A homogeneous fluorescence polarization assay (FPIA) for detection of bovine antibody to Brucella abortus was validated in Argentina Sera were defined based on their reactivity in the buffered antigen plate agglutination test (BPAT) and the competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA). Sera negative in these tests were collected from farms without evidence of brucellosis (n=733). Sera positive in the two tests were collected from cattle on farms from which B. abortus was isolated from at least one animal (n=1039). Sera from cattle vaccinated 26, 89, 240 and 272 days previously with B. abortus strain 19 were collected and tested. A cut-off value of 87 mP was determined for the FPIA, resulting in relative sensitivity and specificity values of 98.1 and 99.6%. The specificity for B. abortus strain 19 vaccinated cattle was 64.9% (26 days post vaccination, DPV), 92.1% (89 DPV), 98.6% (242 DPV) and 97.1% (272 DPV). These values were compared to those obtained with the BPAT, the CELISA, the indirect ELISA, the complement fixation test and the 2-mercaptoethanol agglutination test. Sera from 18 cattle which were vaccinated and revaccinated with B. abortus strain 19 were also tested by the same assays and the FPIA was found to be 100% specific. The use of the FPIA as a diagnostic test for brucellosis is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Diagnosis of bovine brucellosis using a homogeneous fluorescence polarization assay.

To evaluate the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) for the serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis, 118 sera from cattle which were culture positive for Brucella abortus, 1751 sera from cattle from premises containing cattle infected with B. abortus, 1222 sera from cattle vaccinated with B. abortus strain 19 and 1199 sera from cattle with no evidence of brucellosis were tested in Argentina, Chile, Mexico and in the American states of Iowa, Missouri and Texas. Initial determination of serological positivity and negativity was based upon reactivity in currently used serological tests, consisting of a rapid screening test, the rose-bengal or the buffered plate antigen tests, followed by a second serological test, the complement fixation test. Sensitivity of the FPA (sera from culture positive animals) ranged from 87.5% to 100%. Serological positivity of cattle from infected premises ranged from 65.5% to 99.0% while the % negative cattle in herds without evidence of brucellosis was between 94.9 and 100%. Of B. abortus strain 19 vaccinated cattle which were positive in at least one in-use serological tests, 88.2% were negative in the FPA. In contrast, previous Canadian studies, sensitivity values were 99.0% and 100% and the specificity in both cases was 100%. This discrepancy was probably due to the use of less well characterized sera in the current study.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Enzyme immunoassays for serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: A trial in Latin America.

The results of a field trial conducted in Latin America with two indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and two competitive ELISAs (CELISAs) for the detection of bovine antibody to Brucella abortus are reported. One of the CELISA formats performed most accurately. The percentage of positive reactions in the CELISA relative to the selected positive rose bengal agglutination test (RBT) and complement fixation test (CFT) results was 97.47%, the percentage of negatives relative to the selected negative RBT and CFT results for unexposed cattle was 98.32%, and the percentage of negatives in cattle vaccinated with B. abortus 19 was 96.51%. The same assay format under Canadian conditions had an actual sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.90% in nonvaccinates, and a specificity of 97.7% in a strain 19-vaccinated population. Overall, the CELISA performed as expected and the results were not dissimilar from the results obtained in the Canadian study. This provided further evidence that this CELISA can in many instances differentiate infected cattle from those that are vaccinated or infected with a cross-reacting organism while still giving very few false-positive or false-negative results.

Agglutination Tests↗
PubMed1987

Tear lactoferrin levels in patients with external inflammatory ocular disease.

Lactoferrin, an iron complexing protein in normal tears, is an important component of the nonspecific host defense system of the external eye. We measured tear lactoferrin levels in patients with contact lens-induced giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients with active GPC (N = 26) had significantly reduced tear levels of lactoferrin (0.876 +/- 0.42 mg/ml) compared with normal individuals (N = 12; 1.73 +/- 0.46 mg/ml, P less than 0.0003) and the control contact lens wearers' group (N = 11; 1.57 +/- 0.92 mg/ml, P less than 0.003). Patients with vernal conjunctivitis (N = 10), an ocular disease with similar histopathology, had slightly reduced concentrations of tear lactoferrin (1.22 +/- 0.59 mg/ml). Patients with inactive GPC (N = 7) had normal tear levels of lactoferrin (1.33 +/- 0.49 mg/ml). The lactoferrin to total protein ratio in the tears was significantly reduced in patients with GPC compared to normal subjects, control contact lens wearers, and patients with inactive GPC. The decreased tear levels of lactoferrin in patients with GPC may contribute to increased coating of lenses with bacteria and their products and enhanced ocular inflammation which may play a role in the pathogenesis of GPC.

Adenoviridae Infections↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona: detection of antigenic differences among 3 regional isolates from cattle and a reference strain].

Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by Leptospira interrogans. This disease is diagnosed by quantification of specific immunoglobulins in serum by the microagglutination test (MAT). The aims of this research were: a) to compare the protein profiles of 3 clinical isolates of bovine leptospirosis with the reference strain used for the MAT, and b) to identify the immunodomain antigens of the regional isolates through PAGE and immunoblotting techniques of bovine sera from infected, vaccinated and MAT-negative animals. Coomassie-blue stained gels revealed extensive protein similarities between pathogenic and reference strain. Most infected (8/10) and vaccinated animal sera (4/7) showed by immunoblotting a similar reactivity against the proteins from pathogenic leptospires, with a strong band of 25-30 kDa which was not detected in the reference strain. The lack of correlation between MAT and immunoblotting techniques for infected animals could be due either to the infection stage at which the diagnosis was made or to the immunoglobulin isotype involved in the response. Results obtained would confirm the antigenic differences between the 3 isolates and the reference strain.

Agglutination Tests↗