PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Savalle

Publications and source records attributed to L Savalle.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of an automatic intraluminal edge detection technique for intravascular ultrasound images.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging enables detailed analysis and precise measurements of vascular cross-sections. However, to achieve a reduction in the existing level of observer variability requires the development of quantitative IVUS. We have developed a fully automatic intraluminal edge detection technique, based on adaptive active contour models and called ADDER (adaptive damping dependent on echographic regions) that allows the quantitation of the intraluminal cross-sectional area (ICSA). Using a 30-MHz mechanically rotated transducer mounted at the tip of a 3.5-F catheter, 58 normal and pathologic arterial segments (from coronary, renal, splenic, iliac, and carotid arteries) were imaged in vitro. These images were analyzed by 2 experts, E1 and E2, who manually traced the intraluminal contour twice for each image, as well as with ADDER. Intra-observer variabilities for ICSAs were found to be excellent (-1.454 +/- 3.51% for E1, 0.96 +/- 5.4% for E2). The inter-observer variability was 2.1 +/- 4.3%. The success factor for ADDER was 89%. Its intra-observer variability was null, as the method always finds a unique contour. The correlation between the automatically detected ICSA and the manual ICSA was: r = 0.99 (y = 1.03x + 0.89 mm2). Morphometric variations between manually and automatically traced contours, analyzed by the centerline method, were 100 +/- 140 mm on average. In conclusion, the ADDER automatic contour detection applied to IVUS images is robust and characterized by small systematic and random errors; therefore, quantitative IVUS is a useful tool in clinical research trials.

Blood Vessels↗

Prediction of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. Results of PICTURE (Post-IntraCoronary Treatment Ultrasound Result Evaluation), a prospective multicenter intracoronary ultrasound imaging study.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) imaging is potentially suitable to identify lesions at high risk of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), but it has not been studied systematically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recruited 200 patients in whom ICUS studies were performed after successful PTCA and related their ICUS parameters to 6-month follow-up quantitative coronary angiography. This was performed in 164 patients (82%), yielding 170 lesions for analysis. The overall incidence of a > or = 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up (categorical restenosis) was 29.4%. Quantitative ICUS parameters were weakly but significantly related to follow-up minimal luminal diameter on quantitative coronary angiography (lumen area: R2 = .36, P = .0001; vessel area: R2 = .29, P = .0002; plaque area: R2 = -.18, P = .021; percent obstruction: R2 = -.15, P = .05), but categorical restenosis was not significantly related to these parameters (P = .63, .77, .38, and .08, respectively). There were no significant predictors of restenosis in ICUS parameters of plaque morphology: eccentric versus concentric (P = 1.0), plaque type (hard, soft, or calcific, P = .98), or the number of calcified quadrants (P = .41). There were no significant predictors of restenosis in two predefined types of vessel-wall disruptions: (1) rupture: presence (P = .79), depth (partial versus complete, P = .85), or extent in quadrants (P = .6), and (2) dissection: presence (P = .31), depth (P = .82), or extent (P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative ICUS parameters after PTCA did not predict restenosis. A larger lumen and vessel area and a smaller plaque area by ICUS were associated with a larger angiographic minimal lumen diameter at follow-up, but these parameters were not significantly related to categorical restenosis.

Aged↗

Automated contour detection and acoustic quantification.

Echocardiographic left and right ventricular sequences are usually interpreted visually, but current quantitation techniques have been found to be tedious, time-consuming and associated with significant inter- and intra-observer variabilities. In an attempt to eliminate these problems, we have developed the Echocardiographic Analysis System (EAS) which uses robust automated border detection techniques both for single frames as well as for sequences. Comparison of LV cross-sectional area with the semi-automated border detection (AUTO) and those assessed from manual tracings (MAN) yielded a systematic difference (MAN-AUTO) of -6.6% (p < 0.001), and a random difference (standard deviation of paired signed differences) of 11.8%. Current developments are directed towards real-time automated border detection with an Accelerator board, integration of Acoustic Quantification (AQ) data as edge information into EAS, and intravascular echocardiographic applications.

Computers↗