PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Scarff

Publications and source records attributed to L Scarff.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Influence of CT image size and format on accuracy of lung nodule detection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of reducing image size on observers' ability to detect lung nodules on computed tomographic (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stimuli were 80 single sections from 13 normal chest CT studies. On half of the images, 3-5-mm-diameter nodules were superimposed electronically at random locations. Four observers viewed images in six formats and sizes that ranged from 6 on 1 (133 x 133 mm) to 80 on 1 (40 x 40 mm). The images were viewed at a fixed distance of 55 cm and at an unrestricted, variable distance. RESULTS: With the fixed viewing distance, nodule detection decreased with smaller image sizes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) decreased from 0.857 for the 6-on-1 format to 0.671 for the 80-on-1 format (P = .0001). With a variable viewing distance, Az decreased from 0.884 to 0.834 across all formats (difference not statistically significant). However, there was a significant drop in performance with the smallest images (P < .05). Overall, Az for the fixed and variable viewing distances was significantly different (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Reducing image size leads to decreased lung nodule detection on CT scans viewed at a fixed distance; however, the observer can compensate for the smaller image by adjusting the viewing distance.

Humans↗
PubMed1995

Enhanced displays of medical images: evaluation of the effectiveness of color, motion, and contour for detecting and localizing liver lesions.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Many perceptual studies have shown that the detection of large, low-contrast targets is better either in color or in contrast-reversing presentations than in standard gray scale. We determined the value of several new display techniques for viewing liver computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Eight observers (four radiologists and four nonradiologists) viewed sets of 100 liver CT images (50 with lesions and 50 without) under five display conditions on a Macintosh computer: (1) color (equiluminant color contrast); (2) color-luminance (combined luminance and chromatic contrast); (3) flicker (luminance contrast that reversed polarity at 2 Hz); (4) contour (shaded intensity mapping); and (5) control (conventional gray scale). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) techniques were used for analysis. RESULTS: The measured ROC curve areas for the different viewing conditions were as follows: control = 0.77 +/- 0.01 (mean +/- standard error of the mean); color = 0.78 +/- 0.01; color-luminance = 0.82 +/- 0.01; flicker = 0.78 +/- 0.01; and contour = 0.76 +/- 0.01. The percentage of lesions correctly located ranged from 0.82 (color-luminance) to 0.75 (flicker). Performance under the color-luminance condition was significantly better than in the control condition (p = .01), whereas the other experimental conditions were not significantly different from the control condition (p > .21). CONCLUSION: The use of mixed color and luminance displays may have perceptual advantages for radiologists and can improve performance over that of gray-scale viewing.

Color↗