PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Soderstrom

Publications and source records attributed to L Soderstrom.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The health and cost effects of substituting home care for inpatient acute care: a review of the evidence.

BACKGROUND: There is much interest in reducing hospital stays by providing some health care services in patients' homes. The authors review the evidence regarding the effects of this acute care at home (acute home care) on the health of patients and caregivers and on the social costs (public and private costs) of managing the patients' health conditions. METHODS: MEDLINE and HEALTHSTAR databases were searched for articles using the key term "home care." Bibliographies of articles read were checked for additional references. Fourteen studies met the selection criteria (publication between 1975 and early 1998, evaluation of an acute home care program for adults, and use of a control group to evaluate the program). Of the 14, only 4 also satisfied 6 internal validity criteria (patients were eligible for home care, comparable patients in home care group and hospital care group, adequate patient sample size, appropriate analytical techniques, appropriate health measures and appropriate costing methods). RESULTS: The 4 studies with internal validity evaluated home care for 5 specific health conditions (hip fracture, hip replacement, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], hysterectomy and knee replacement); 2 of the studies also evaluated home care for various medical and surgical conditions combined. Compared with hospital care, home care had no notable effects on patients' or caregivers' health. Social costs were not reported for hip fracture. They were unaffected for hip and knee replacement, and higher for COPD and hysterectomy; in the 2 studies of various conditions combined, social costs were higher in one and lower in the other. Effects on health system costs were mixed, with overall cost savings for hip fracture and higher costs for hip and knee replacement. INTERPRETATION: The limited existing evidence indicates that, compared with hospital care, acute home care produces no notable difference in health outcomes. The effects on social and health system costs appear to vary with condition. More well-designed evaluations are needed to determine the appropriate use of acute home care.

Acute Disease↗

Home-based management can achieve intensification cost-effectively in type I diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetic children are most often admitted to hospital for education and insulin management and subsequently followed in outpatient clinics or office settings. However, most could be managed at home, given adequate family and health care team support and subsequent follow-up facilitated by home-based nursing intervention. We conducted a randomized trial of clinical, psychosocial, and cost effects of home-based management in a 2-year follow-up study of newly diagnosed diabetic children. METHODS: Sixty three patients were randomly assigned to traditional hospitalization and outpatient follow-up (hospital-based group) or home management (home-based group). Treatment differences between the two groups consisted of duration of initial hospital stay, site and timing of initial teaching, and nature and extent of subsequent nursing follow-up. Metabolic control was assessed by means of quarterly glycosylated hemoglobin measurements for 24 months and then at 36 months. Diabetes-related adverse events, knowledge of diabetes, adherence to the diabetes regimen, psychosocial impact, and social (total) costs incurred were assessed for 24 months. FINDINGS: Glycosylated hemoglobin concentrations were significantly lower in the home-based group at 12 to 24 months and at 36 months. Both groups had comparable numbers of diabetes-related adverse events. There were no significant group differences in psychosocial impact. Parents in the home-based group spent significantly fewer hours on diabetes care and incurred significantly lower out-of-pocket expenses during the 1st month. Health care sector costs were significantly higher. Hospital costs were $889 higher, and government costs $890 higher per child. Social (total) costs were only $48 higher per case (NS) with home care when parents' time was valued at $11.88 per hour. INTERPRETATION: Home-based management for newly diagnosed diabetic children can result in better metabolic control and similar psychosocial outcomes compared with traditional hospital- and clinic-based care without notable effects on social (total) costs.

Child↗

An economic evaluation of home care for children with newly diagnosed diabetes: results from a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the health and cost effects of using home care to treat newly diagnosed Type I diabetic children rather than traditional inpatient hospital care. There had been no well-designed evaluations of home care for such children, and very few for children with other health conditions. METHODS: Sixty-three children seen at the Montreal Children's Hospital were randomly assigned at diagnosis to home care or traditional inpatient care. The children in the former group were discharged once their metabolic condition stabilized; insulin adjustments and teaching were done in their homes by a trained nurse. The children in the latter group remained hospitalized for insulin adjustments and teaching. All were followed for 24 months. The cost effects were estimated using hospital and parental data. RESULTS: Social costs were only $48 higher with home care. It had little effect on social costs, because the increased costs of health care services with home care ($768) were largely offset by parental cost savings ($720). Home care improved the children's metabolic outcomes without adversely affecting their psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Using home care to reduce hospital stays for children with newly diagnosed Type I diabetes improved the children's health outcomes without significantly increasing social costs.

Adolescent↗