PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

L Steinbach

Publications and source records attributed to L Steinbach.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Esketamine multi-omic biomarker evaluation in major depressive disorder (EMBER-MDD): concept, objectives and methodologies of a non-clinical investigator-initiated study.

Treatment resistance (TR) in major depressive disorder (MDD) affects a substantial minority of patients and is hard to recognize early, delaying intensified care. The Esketamine multi-omic biomarker evaluation in MDD (EMBER-MDD) is a non-interventional, investigator-initiated, in-vitro study within the EU Psych-STRATA programme, analyzing biospecimens collected in the randomized INTENSIFY study and the mirror OBS-TR cohort after participants complete treatment. EMBER-MDD aims to discover individual-omic and integrated multi-omic (hypothesis-free) biomarkers and signatures associated with TR risk, and molecular correlates of clinical response to esketamine nasal spray versus treatment as usual (TAU). Biomaterials will derive from approximately 420 adults with MDD (estimated n = 210 esketamine; n = 210 TAU) and include whole blood, RNA-stabilized whole blood, plasma and serum, sampled at baseline and, when feasible, during and after treatment (up to ~ 5,040 aliquots stored at - 80 °C). Genomics will use baseline DNA genotyping on Illumina Infinium GSA v3.0+MD arrays; epigenomics will profile genome-wide DNA methylation across time points using MethylationEPIC v2.0; transcriptomics will employ mRNA-seq (NovaSeq X/ X Plus); and proteomics/ metabolomics will be generated using high-throughput Olink and/ or Biocrates platforms. Each layer will undergo state-of-the-art preprocessing and analyses (e.g., GWAS/ PRS, EWAS, differential expression, WGCNA, pathway and network analyses), followed by integrative strategies including QTL mapping (meQTL/ eQTL/ pQTL/ mQTL) and intermediate-fusion machine learning with nested cross-validation, explainable AI (SHAP/ LIME) and treatment-effect modelling. All outputs are research-only and will not support individual efficacy, tolerability, or clinical decision-making. The study will deliver robust biosignatures and mechanistic hypotheses to guide future validation and inform stratified, molecularly guided intervention strategies in subsequent prospective trials. Trial registration number: 2023-506617-21-00 and 2025-178-f-S.

Humans↗
PubMed1990

Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: rationale and current applications.

Because it can demonstrate a wide range of tissue contrast with excellent resolution, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has revolutionized imaging in many areas of the musculoskeletal system and has generated excitement among those interested in the painful shoulder. Shoulder impingement syndrome and glenohumeral instability constitute the two major categories of shoulder derangements. Correct diagnosis requires the use of appropriate pulse sequences and imaging planes, proper patient positioning, and a satisfactory surface coil. In addition the imager must have a thorough understanding of shoulder anatomy and pathology. We present a summary of the current status of MR imaging of the shoulder including technical, anatomic, and pathologic considerations and a review of the pertinent literature.

Humans↗
PubMed1989

[Possibilities of MR tomography of diseases of the hand and wrist].

MRI studies of 63 patients with various abnormalities of the hand and wrist were analyzed. Studies were performed on scanners with a field strength of 0.35, 0.5, or 1.5 T. Imaging parameters included T1- and T2-weighted sequences in the coronal and transverse planes and contiguous slices 3-5 mm thick. In 37 patients with post-traumatic disorders, MRI revealed carpal avascular necrosis, tendon abnormalities and, in some cases, abnormalities of interosseous ligaments and the triangular fibrocartilage. In 15 patients with such inflammatory diseases as arthritis, tenosynovitis and carpal tunnel syndrome and in 11 patients with tumors, MRI provided clear delineation of osseous and soft tissue abnormalities. The current role of MRI in the diagnosis of hand and wrist abnormalities is discussed on the basis of these results.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

Quick word slides.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Audiovisual Aids↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A prospective comparison of computerized arthrotomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the glenohumeral joint.

Twenty-five patients with shoulder instability or shoulder pain of undetermined etiology were prospectively evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging and computerized arthrotomography. Actual lesions were determined by arthroscopy or at the time of open surgical repair. The images obtained were interpreted independently by three radiologists blinded to both surgical results and the results of previous diagnostic tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined for each imaging technique for a variety of pathologic entities, including anterior and posterior labral abnormalities, capsular redundancy, biceps-labral complex abnormalities, humeral head (Hill-Sachs) impression lesions, and glenohumeral loose bodies. Analysis of imaging techniques also included construction of receiver operator curves for labral abnormalities. Magnetic resonance imaging showed better diagnostic results in the evaluation of glenoid labral and humeral head impression lesions (P < 0.05). Both imaging techniques were equally successful in identifying biceps-labral lesions and intraarticular loose bodies within the glenohumeral joint. Neither imaging technique was consistent in the evaluation of capsular redundancy. Receiver operator curve analysis confirmed that magnetic resonance imaging was the more accurate imaging study in evaluating anterior and posterior glenoid labral abnormalities.

Adolescent↗