Biomedical subjects

L Stocchi

Publications and source records attributed to L Stocchi.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1988

Clinical reliability of diagnostic tests in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

To determine the diagnostic value and precision of the quantitative skin test (QST), RAST, specific nasal (NPT) and conjunctival (CPT) provocation tests, we studied 91 patients, suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with positive skin prick tests (SPT) to common allergens, among whom sixty-nine of them had symptoms related to the positive SPT, and 22 had no clinical correspondence. In these two groups, by comparing the threshold of positivity, we investigated whether there was any parallelism between responses to the tests considered. We also compared the level of specific IgE (RAST) to the wheal-areas evoked by preliminary SPT for the corresponding allergen in order to detect any quantitative relationship between these investigations. Increasing concentrations of standardized allergen extracts (from 10 to 100,000 BU/ml) were used in all in vivo tests. NPT was evaluated on the basis of multiple recordings of nasal resistances by anterior passive rhinomanometry. QST proved to correlate well with RAST and its easier method ensures it a major role in assessing the levels of allergic sensitization. SPT wheal-areas and RAST vales correlated well only for grass and birch, presumably because of better standardization of these allergen extracts. When provocation tests, especially NPT, were positive, patients were almost always symptomatic for the allergen tested (high positive predictive value). Likewise, 21 out of the 22 asymptomatic subjects had negative NPT (high specificity). These results suggested the utility of standardized provocation tests in order to restrict diagnosis to the truly causative allergens in patients with multiple positive SPT results.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1987

IgE-mediated food allergy.

The behaviour of some immunologic parameters was studied in order to explain the presence or the lack of symptomatology in subjects with IgE specific to foods. In particular, we compared the levels of serum and salivary IgA and IgE antibody specific to apple in 33 patients allergic to birch and with anti-apple IgE, of whom 24 had oral allergy syndrome after eating apple and nine were apple tolerants. We found no differences in the IgE-related parameters such as levels of anti-apple IgE antibody in serum and secretions, mean size of apple skin prick test, and number of patients with a positive histamine release from peripheral basophils stimulated by apple. Similarly, we detected no statistically significant differences in serum and salivary total IgG and total anti-apple IgA antibody of the two groups. We could, however, observe a significantly higher anti-apple salivary IgA/anti-apple serum IgE and anti-apple salivary IgA/anti-apple serum IgA ratios and a significant correlation between the same parameters in tolerant patients when compared with the intolerants. These results seem to suggest that the presence of appropriate levels of secretory anti-apple IgA associated to anti-apple IgE might be one of the factors playing a key role in the prevention of clinical symptoms in atopic subjects.

Food Hypersensitivity↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Are double-blind food challenges necessary before starting an elimination diet?

Food allergy is normally treated by eliminating the offending food. Such a measure, however, may cause nutritional and sociopsychological problems, so an allergy must be diagnosed with the utmost certainty. To date the most reliable diagnostic test is the double-blind food challenge (DBFC). The rationale for using this test is the marked difference in positive results with open and double-blind food challenges. Only about 30% of open challenges that appear positive are confirmed on blind challenge. There is ample evidence, too, that a negative DBFC may in fact indicate tolerance to that food. From the literature it appears that almost all patients who reintroduced a certain food into their diet after a DBFC had given negative findings did not present any adverse reaction to it. In our caselist of 21 patients with probable reactions to foods but negative DBFC, 19 (90.5%) tolerated the "incriminated" food well when it was reintroduced into their diet even in unlimited amounts. Only two (9.5%) again presented symptoms when they started taking large amounts of the problem food. Therefore, one precaution recommended before reintroducing a food item into a patient's diet after a negative DBFC is to check how it is tolerated at high doses. A review of the literature confirms the unquestioned utility of the DBFC. Nevertheless, in some situations this test is not indicated. The main one, of course, is in patients with life-threatening symptoms such as anaphylactic shock or glottis edema, in whom any provocation test is contraindicated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diet↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Immediate and long-term results in ileoanastomosis with reservoir in 335 consecutive cases].

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis is the first choice procedure for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. The introduction of the stapled technique has shortened the duration of the procedure and reduced the complication rates. Data on 335 consecutive patients undergoing ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (277 pts), Indeterminate colitis (20 pts) and familial adenomatous polyposis (38 pts) between 1984 and 1998 were prospectively collected. Parameters evaluated included diagnosis, surgical technique, functional outcome, early and late complications and their management and results. Twenty-nine patients (8.6%) presented with pelvic sepsis. Twelve patients (3.5%) experienced late perianal fistulas. The pouch failure rate was 3.4%. Six patients required a re-do pouch procedure, with 75.9% preservation of sphincter function. No correlation was found between complication rates and diagnosis. The mean number of stools was 5.2/24 h. The study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. In particular, morbidity rates are comparable to those of major abdominal procedures and the long-term functional results are satisfactory. However, a number of technical aspects, such as the anastomosis technique, the need for temporary ileostomy and the treatment of indeterminate colitis, still remain controversial.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗