PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

L T Klane

Publications and source records attributed to L T Klane.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Decision speed and bias after unilateral stroke.

Nonverbal visual memory together with speed and bias in response decisions were evaluated in two experiments comparing patients with a left-hemisphere stroke lesion to those with a right-hemisphere stroke lesion. In the first experiment, the decision times of vocal recognition responses from aphasic (left stroke) patients did not correlate with their verbal scores on the Porch Index of Communicative Ability, taken as an estimate of severity of their language impairment. Thus, impairment of verbal processing was not reflected in speed of response. In the second experiment, 19 left and 19 right-stroke patients were compared with 19 volunteers on a recurrent recognition task of complex nonverbal art designs using measures of discriminability and decision bias derived from Theory of Signal Detection. Right stroke patients had lowest recognition scores but adopted normal decision criteria, whereas left stroke patients employed high negative decision bias (i.e., made few false as well as few correct recognitions). Both stroke groups responded significantly slower than controls; the right stroke patients, however, had markedly fewer long-latency decisions than left stroke patients. Compared with controls, only the speed and bias of decision making were deficient in left stroke patients independent of their verbal deficit; their recognition ability was relatively preserved.

Aphasia

Aged and error differences on Memory-for-Designs.

Age reliably predicted performance of 120 volunteers, 20 to 84 yr. old, on the Memory-for-Designs test. Scoring employed both the Graham-Kendall and a modified scoring technique in which each of 15 designs was rated within six error categories (reversal, distortion, omission, rotation, embellishment, perseveration). Inter-rater reliability of four raters indicated a marked scoring consistency and the error category scoring interacted with age, i.e., older persons (greater than 60 yr.) made more omission and distortion errors than younger persons (less than 40 yr.) who committed proportionally more reversal errors. Concomitant performance on the WAIS Block Design accounted for only part of the age differences in errors. The error category scoring was more sensitive to age differences in visual memory than the usual Graham-Kendall scoring method. In addition, it provided much needed age norms.

Adult